Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[lovat scout] 26/10/2018 19:10

Log - I can assure you that no sane investor will buy shares from the management before they deliver on the business plan. NR’s only exit options are to make VRS a success or via a takeover.

[ellissj] 26/10/2018 19:08

Indeed, and now off to meet US govt, before cali FF ! Glalth. Best ellis

[forestfred] 26/10/2018 19:04

Food for thought .

How great it is that the uk governent are supporting Versarien .

You .
Don’t see many governments backing small companies like this .

I wonder why that is , it says a lot to me as a shareholder .
What about you guys .
Ff

[loglorry1] 26/10/2018 18:40

@lovat agree that a positive is that VRS has strengthened the balance sheet with the raise at 145p. No question that's a positive. Relative to the £175m market cap though the cash balance is insignificant. 4p/share something like that.

As for director skin in the game. Works both ways despite what he tells you he'll be thinking of ways to sell and lock in gains I'm sure. He's paid £4000 for his shares worth more than £25m. Anyone sensible would want to realise gains.

As far as I can tell what you say about it being subjective is certainly true but that's sort ofy point. If NR can't meet the enormous expectations he's set he'll quickly find his very large retail investor base falls out of love with his relentless promotion.

[ellissj] 26/10/2018 18:37

I agree luckyO, looks to me like a 10% index correction across the board has been set. The compooters then play that game out. Vrs again supported 3 times today above/at 110p. Those looking for a crash in either the main markets or vrs might be disappointed. Aimho. Best ellis

[ellissj] 26/10/2018 18:33

Musk rates supercaps since 2011 ! This more recent quote says energy density problem needs solving. Hmm. Step foward vrs/gnano ?! Aimo. Best ellis

"Tesla CEO Elon Musk has already backed supercapacitors but said “we need a breakthrough in energy density” 

[luckyorange] 26/10/2018 18:31

Stock market crashes are caused by panic selling , simple as that. Algorithms should take the sentiment out of that , but guess what, it is humans who set the algo's . Corrections are ok and short term, paper money is made and lost until the tables turn.

As far as predicting the future of the market goes nobody can and if they could they wouldn't be on this bb that's for sure!

[lovat scout] 26/10/2018 18:13

Log - see my post 43326. A couple of non-graphene reasons why there is a disparity in the market valuations. AIMHO of course.

[club sandwich] 26/10/2018 18:09

So much for a Friday bounce...

[axotyl] 26/10/2018 18:07

"...I'm not sure" - Log
"....Distribution of lateral size we know.." - We? Lol
"....So we reach the same conclusion.." - We do?

Hard-hitting stuff. Just pathetic innuendo.

Log, your OCD affliction with 'typos' can be sorted with professional help. PM me for advice.

Note to newcomers (and there've been a bunch today, particularly from Oz) - LogLorry is desperate to talk down VRS - there's no other reason he's here.

[dreamtwister] 26/10/2018 17:57

ive just put a order in for a gram of nanene so the boost in sales, should lift the share price......thank you all for the pm of gratitude.......atb

[loglorry1] 26/10/2018 17:46

I didn't say there were loads of suppliers of FLG Graphene in size but there are some. Two being FGR and XGS.

FLG being 3-10 layers isn't the be all and end all anyway. For many applications more layers can provide better properties for others it's not so important.

The companies above can produce over 100mt/yr. I'm not sure at 0.365mt/yr you can really call VRS a company that can produce FLG at size.

Number of layers is also only one property. Distribution of lateral size we know is very important in strengthening polymers as a high aspect ratio is important. Nanene post the correction of the "typo" seems lacking in this property compared to its peer group.

I agree with Nature article. A lot of companies selling Graphene are not selling FLG as per the iso spec. That doesn't mean VRS is the only one that is.

So we reach the same conclusion. Not the only or best producer out there, miles behind in scale up and a £150m market cap premium.

The shares are way overvalued.

[forestfred] 26/10/2018 17:32

Have a good weekend .

Very exciting times.

You can’t stop the progress of disruptive technology or indeed
Our ceo Nr
He is powered by Nanene .
Ff gla

[bobsworth] 26/10/2018 17:07

What a plonker you are!

[squire007] 26/10/2018 17:04

Machinery arrives in November now .... :-)

[tomduck] 26/10/2018 16:52

John Henry - If the FTSE falls below 6000 then it will be a fantastic long term entry point. To be fair even at 6900 it is more than fairly valued imo, if you have a mid term time frame.

[ellissj] 26/10/2018 16:49

S&P now corrected today. All bounced off lows. Best ellis.

"The tech selling spread to the Dow, which fell 500 points, or 2%. The S&P 500 declined 2.8%, joining the Nasdaq in a correction. Both indexes are down more than 10% from record highs."

[fhasson] 26/10/2018 16:32

Topped up minutes to go for 112.94 .

[tini5] 26/10/2018 16:28

Sorry, I just bought some more.

[john henry] 26/10/2018 16:27

In these market stock picking is vital.

Special situations could do well

[john henry] 26/10/2018 16:26

To be honest since 2011 the market has been pretty benign.i think 6200-6500 will see a decent correction and would probably represent a fair value for the market considering the mounting problems that need discounting.
Imho the US will probably start pricing in a US recession towards the end of 2019.
end of 2019 might see the FTSE around 5500

[festario] 26/10/2018 16:25

They make it look red to spook people into selling, when in reality I can sell way above the mid price!Come on guys, play straight will you?

[66sequoia] 26/10/2018 16:25

Https://www.nationalgrapheneassociation.com/news/the-global-graphene-expo-whats-happened-in-the-last-year/