Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 11:27

Exactly you imagine. I called the number on the nanene data sheet and the person I was put though to had left his desk, so they said they would call me back. I will inform everyone of the outcome.

[ellissj] 28/8/2018 11:23

I imagine neill relied upon expert opinion to guide him before making that iso statement teepee. This is basic stuff. Aimo. Best ellis

[ellissj] 28/8/2018 11:11

Looks that way rtj. Same behaviour since 60's imo. Probably indicates that buyer/s want more than II's left here have as well. Hopefully done soon. Aimo. Best ellis.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 11:10

I'm sure he did. But it he on the iso panel? I will email him. Great suggestion

[ellissj] 28/8/2018 11:08

Teepee, In the interims last autumn, neill said nanene meets iso defn. As a lth, email your concerns to NR direct. Best ellis

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 11:07

I think it will as well.

[dgduncan] 28/8/2018 11:06

1teepee. Bearing in mind the writers of the ISO, it is highly unlikely that Nanene would not meet the standard. If they didn't - no other company would.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 11:02

Yes better quality than everyone else. Not diputing that. Just wondering if it will pass iso when 10% of it is graphite.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 11:00

I have read it, but that was not my question. Serratio answered my question, Thanks serratio for understanding my question and knowing I was not poo Pooing Vrs or Neill Ricketts. Therefore able to answer logically without putting anger into his answer and clouding their minds.

[dgduncan] 28/8/2018 10:58

1teepee - even with 10% content more than 10 layers, Nanene is way better quality than anyone else. I have not found any company that can make better quality GNP. The tests done by all, including UOM, UOC etc have found that Nanene can make a great improvement to many materials. Other competitor graphene may also lead to improvements but work with the most consistent best graphene and you get the optimum result. IMO.

[sandbag] 28/8/2018 10:55

"am not into our ceo worshipping as many seem to be."

When you have two or three decades of investing and have invested in hundreds of companies as some on here have you might find that the VRS CEO is totally one of a kind. Whilst not worshipping him I'm just knocked out by the sheer hard work, integrity and care for his fellow investors. Practically unknown on AIM.

[axotyl] 28/8/2018 10:54

Rainbow just sent me this by PM, and too shy to post it himself; be gentle.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 10:54

Thanks, that's the most sense I've managed to get this morning. Maybe everyone is hung over. Appreciated

[runthejoules] 28/8/2018 10:53

Seller not going below £1.50? L2 anybody?

[spike_1] 28/8/2018 10:51

1 teepee; your last post makes it clear that you do not have the first clue about either this BB and or its level of credibility.

Neither have you done any homework (unlike the vast majority of posters on here).

'ALL' you need to do is spend a day or three going through posts for say the last three or four months, and then - and by the look of it - only then, will you begin to grasp the potential of VRS, of Neill Ricketts, and - yes - this BB.

Good luck - Spike

[serratia] 28/8/2018 10:49

1teepee,

The iso standard is now behind a pay wall so I can't immediately see the definition of 'few layer graphene' I wouldn't expect it to state exactly what portion of the material is sub 10 layers probably a majority percentage.
As regards cost graphite is £1000/ton - 0.1p/gm. Neill has given a guide to yields/margins in the past and both are high so expect a good gross margin on prices indicated so far. It isn't possible to identify an exact selling price as it will depend on volume and also the price will be what the market can stand which may be different for different applications.
In addition as they move to larger machines the labour cost will remain fixed so margins increase, also larger machines are more automated. There was also the implication that one operator can run more than one machine at a time.
I would not be too worried about production costs.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 10:48

https://www.nanene.com/wp-content/uploads/TDS-Nanene-V5.pdfThis data sheet says 10% is above 10 layers. Iso standards are below 10 layers . Therefore 10% of the nanene is contaminated with graphite?Does that make sense? If not why not?Thanks for your time

[chimpandy1] 28/8/2018 10:44

Rainbow is back so the next leg up is imminent. We are up nicely since rainbow last told everyone to get out.

[1teepee] 28/8/2018 10:44

I am a lth but am not into our ceo worshipping as many seem to be. Any perspective that question the quality of nanene, seems to upset people. I'm it's only a few, there are many who have a great temperament on here. So thanks to them, they know who they are

[spike_1] 28/8/2018 10:40

Note to Rainbow: please try harder, 'get out quick' is a bit lame don't you think.

Keep smiling - Spike

[johnveals] 28/8/2018 10:40

I probably understand the science as well as most but for me it is the narrative, which is utterly compelling.

[rogerbridge] 28/8/2018 10:40

We are making excellent progress and it will be interesting to see what comes of Neil’s visit to the U.S.A. I believe he is also speaking at a Graphene event.
Events seem to be hotting up with many negotiations going on behind the scene.

Time to chill out before the next surge in the share price.

[superg1] 28/8/2018 10:40

teepee

If you read the links provided and the lol thread then you will understand better.

It's a subject that has been covered many times.

EG both Thomas Swann and XG can do few layer but the process is harsh and destroys aspect ratios and raises defect ratios.

The CPI tender set out requirements of sizes and hence as posted at the time it looked like VRS were about the only one that could hit the spec. They won all 4 tenders they put in for. Anyone worldwide could apply.

VRS even got the hbn tender which is a material TS were already producing. At that point we didn't even know VRS were active on hbn.

Have a read of the links etc.

[luckyorange] 28/8/2018 10:39

The most important thing to remember with VRS 1teepee is that NR spent a lot of time almost on his own ensuring that it was all proved up, giving presentations, liaising with those in the know etc;h

He didn't do it all on his own and recognised that by giving one employee some share options because of the hard work that they had done.

Now he has a team of experts in their field employed by the company. It has taken a while but he has built up a lot of trust and expertees bearing in mind the other graphene producers out there and what they can do.

We know it works and has previously unseen benefits. Now it is all down to buyers of the product all of the groundwork has been done.

What it really comes down to now is trusting the team , I do.

Because you haven't been investing long that is a big statement to make of an AIM company by me, because there are some serious scam companies out there and you will find out as time goes by.

VRS is not one of those companies and a breath of fresh air hence the interest in it.