ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

TOM Tomco Energy Plc

0.0275
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Tomco Energy Plc LSE:TOM London Ordinary Share IM00BZBXMN96 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.0275 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells 0 -2.35M -0.0006 -0.50 1.07M
Tomco Energy Plc is listed in the Drilling Oil And Gas Wells sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker TOM. The last closing price for Tomco Energy was 0.03p. Over the last year, Tomco Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 0.0275p to 0.13p.

Tomco Energy currently has 3,904,135,277 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Tomco Energy is £1.07 million. Tomco Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.50.

Tomco Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 41301 to 41321 of 56575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1663  1662  1661  1660  1659  1658  1657  1656  1655  1654  1653  1652  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/9/2021
15:40
SL
Of course the placing will be dependent on finding a source whose terms will not wreck the present share price.
And without a placing now, TOM is really going to be on very thin ice which could
mean putting land purchase on hold etc.
As JP told you, TOM does not have an illustrious past. This project is massive for a small business and is going take tremendous skill and expertise to succeed.

lopodop
11/9/2021
15:02
SL
If you are so very confident about the cash position, then why ask? You say no placing - wait a little longer.
As for cash requirement, ask TOM's NOMAD. You may be surprised.
Assuming everything proceeds, there could be a three year lead time to have things up and running. Look at how long it has taken to get so far! But by all means dream on and on and await events.

lopodop
11/9/2021
13:32
Lopidop, can you please provide us with the estimated cash in bank (it'll be 7 figures) and current monthly cash burn you are using to calculate the need for imminent placing. Also any documentation to back up the need for 3 years working capital to satisfy the nomad. That's highly unusual. Numbers rather than waffle if you don't mind. I will however accept "I have no idea". Thanks in anticipation.
stuart little
11/9/2021
13:29
they will be in production in around 12 months. Stupid remark lopo, 5000 bopd incoming and you know it.
rmart
11/9/2021
13:11
Thrgef
As matters stand right now, there are many open issues which make your personal view wholly misleading. If the Board's tentative announcements of transactions come to fruition in the next months, then yes one may reasonably expect a share price shift upwards but this will be tempered by an imminent unavoidable placing if TOM is to have adequate cash resources for the next two or three years.

lopodop
11/9/2021
12:18
Ha, no need to try and engage with me. I don't tend to hang around in this cess pit. This is only going one way in the next few weeks/months and that's up
Good luck all.

thrgef
11/9/2021
11:18
Both sides are becoming very exciting PQE and out TOM if this comes good im on retirement, and starting my own classic restoration of Bevel Ducati's
vauch
11/9/2021
11:15
Busa, how much can be used against profits as tax write down
vauch
11/9/2021
10:30
Yesterday, 44 views, this morning 514.



It was only released yesterday afternoon. Maybe a busy Monday??

rmart
11/9/2021
08:44
Thrgef
Messrs Groat and Castro will know the extreme risks for TOM with its fast decreasing cash availability. Irrespective of said alternative option for the land purchase, they will not want TOM to fail for want of a cash infusion whatever the downside for investors. Opening up communication channels this week has been an attempt to boost the share price in order to mitigate dilution effects of a placing. However there may be some disappointment for them with the result so far. Neither will wish to delay the infusion nor to feed present uncertainty. In order to be seen to do the right thing, they have little option but press the green light and go for a realistic placing as time is so short. No reason for it to wobble the share value other than short term so long as land purchase is secured this month. If land purchase does not go ahead then TOM will return to more of same but at the very least cash resources will look realistic.

lopodop
11/9/2021
08:17
thrgef
Serious investors will appreciate your invaluable nonsense.

lopodop
11/9/2021
07:22
From GKP thread:

beernut11 Sep '21 - 07:21 - 640369 of 640369

OIL & GAS
Oil price could hit $200 without new investments says Omani minister
10/09/2021
By Energy Voice
Oil prices could hit $200 per barrel if no new investments are made in the upstream oil and gas sector in the short-term, Oman's energy and minerals minister said yesterday in reply to the International Energy Agency's (IEAs) assessment for reaching net-zero emissions by 2050, reported S&P Global Platts.

busamitch
11/9/2021
06:26
Interesting reading Vauch. How much money have they got and how much do they owe? Are they still with the TSX explaining their accounts?
goulding1215
11/9/2021
01:14
Will there even be a long term share price for either TOM or PQE?
busamitch
10/9/2021
22:01
Huge price correction coming over the next 3 weeks then again by the end of the year. Shouldn't be scared of placing if they go down that route for the £1.7m as share price will jump immediately after announcement. Reserve figure to be announced soon with QFI sample results. What's not to like.
thrgef
10/9/2021
21:10
jaynealex, I would set a target of 0.00p.
the diddymen
10/9/2021
19:56
And what long term share price for Tom !!??
jaynealex
10/9/2021
19:32
Is Petroteq Energy (PQEFF) a buy for 2021?
In May, Petroteq energy soared to highs of ~$0.20 from a price of ~$0.04, representing a near 400% gain. This attracted many new investors, intrigued by the price action and business model of the company. The price action was a result Uppgard AB (acting as a middleman) offering 0.48 Euro per share to purchase 200 million shares of Petroteq. The clarify, this offer was made directly to shareholders (holding a minimum of 1,000,000 shares). Although this offer led to substantial price action, relative to the offer shares remain highly undervalued.


Why is this? The simple fact remains; much of the market is uncertain whether the offer is serious or will be followed through. Furthermore, the credibility of the offer is often questioned as people wonder, “if I can buy shares on the open market and sell it to them, why don’t they just buy it on the open market?” For one, it would drive the share price incredibly high. As well, it would simply take too long, or simply be impossible due to such low volume.

Since then, other entities such as Balmoral investments LTD have offered to purchase shares for 0.66 Euros ($0.78) for transactions over 1.5 million shares (offer adjusted to a minimum of 550,000 shares). Relative to current levels, this represents an increase of 6-7 times. Note, this offer has only been available for EU investors. Due to regulatory issues, it is not yet available for US investors. According to an Uppgard Konsult AB update from June, “The client and the company are now evaluating the official expansion of the offering to the North American market.”

This being said, the value of Petroteq Energy does not in any way hinge on the credibility of these offers. If they both prove to be insincere (which appears unlikely), the company remains exceedingly undervalued.

What are oil sands?

The idea of separating oil from tar sands is not a new concept. In fact, “the oil sands of Alberta have only been developed commercially since the late 1960s” However, the process has proven incredibly environmentally harmful (not to mention low margins).

“Tar sands oil — even the name sounds bad. And it is bad. In fact, oil from tar sands is one of the most destructive, carbon-intensive and toxic fuels on the planet. Producing it releases three times as much greenhouse gas pollution as conventional crude oil does.”

Is this true for Petroteq as well? Will they get push back from environmental groups? No, quite the opposite. In fact, Petroteq brands themselves as a sustainable company, putting “the environment first”. How is this possible? To quote PQEFF’s website,

“We produce oil without any significant waste, emissions or water use. We have removed the unwanted externalities from oil production that can be seen in other oil sands operations, fracking, and even conventional wells. So instead, our process LOOKS MORE LIKE REMEDIATION of oil-bearing near-surface sands that are cleaned to EPA Tier 1 quality before being returned, leaving the world a little cleaner than we found it. We produce oil without any significant waste, emissions or water use. We have removed the unwanted externalities from oil production that can be seen in other oil sands operations, fracking, and even conventional wells. So instead, our process LOOKS MORE LIKE REMEDIATION of oil-bearing near-surface sands that are cleaned to EPA Tier 1 quality before being returned, leaving the world a little cleaner than we found it.”

Sounds pretty good, from the environmental perspective.

Profitability of the technology:

As affirmed by the 3rd party analysis, the cost to produce oil using Petroteq’s proprietary method is ~$22 per barrel. It gets even better. Considering the method used to procure the oil, a sand byproduct is generated. For every barrel of oil (costing $22), 1.12 tons of (commercial) sand-byproduct is produced. Considering the industrial applications of this sand type, it can be sold for $11.80. Subtracting the cost to produce the oil ($22) by the profits from the sand ($11.80) allows an adjusted cost of $10.20 per barrel. Considering one barrel can be sold for $50-70+ dollars (depending on the market), this is incredibly cheap. Prior to this, separation technology had much lower profit margins (not to mention the environmental impact) …

“In 2014, the cost to produce oil sands crude was more than $60 per barrel (expressed in WTI terms), but improvements and efficiencies have brought costs down to $46 to $53 per barrel, according to one estimate, and the mid $40s, by another.”

Therefore, it can be concluded this proprietary method PQEFF holds is incredibly profitable, allowing for low vulnerability to fluctuations from oil prices (unlike other companies in the tar sands industry). One might ask, how much retrievable oil exists in oil sands? Well, Utah alone contains 10 billion barrels (of recoverable oil), which is where Petroteq is located. Globally this number is estimated to be in trillions.

To preface, following estimates are of speculative nature.

Medium term SP: $0.20-0.60

Long term SP: $5+

PQEFF appears very underpriced, with a high likelihood of future growth. Since the completion of the Feed analysis, this play is incredibly de-risked, with the general market underscoring just how groundbreaking this technology is.

vauch
10/9/2021
19:30
RMART
Thanks. Many many mistakes yes but not this time. That's how wisdom grows. Have a great weekend.

lopodop
10/9/2021
18:55
lopodopyploppy

I am sooo looking forward to the next few weeks and seeing you crawl under the rock from which you came. It will be so much fun.

Be sure to give us a wave though as you go. Don't be embarrassed, we all make mistakes.

rmart
10/9/2021
18:52
Where is wilson.
Has he left the board?

vauch
Chat Pages: Latest  1663  1662  1661  1660  1659  1658  1657  1656  1655  1654  1653  1652  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock