We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tlou Energy Limited | LSE:TLOU | London | Ordinary Share | AU000000TOU2 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.625 | 0.60 | 0.65 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leather Tanning & Finishing | 0 | -4.25M | -0.0057 | -1.75 | 4.64M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/9/2018 18:29 | LOL....at you | mgellie | |
10/9/2018 18:09 | That's just gibberish - are you having a mental breakdown? You should go away and calm down and just have a re-think about the meaning of reserves. You're also getting totally confused about the independently verified reserves - 0.35 BCF 1P; 40.8 BCF 2P and 426.6 BCF 3P - plenty for the initial 10 MW facility. Something else for you to try and understand is 'independently verified'. | andrewsr | |
10/9/2018 14:18 | Donks I still maintain that it this is as bad as you say and yet you, as you state, are invested, then you must see profit in it. Which means if it goes even marginally better than you expect, we’re quids in | satsuma1 | |
10/9/2018 12:17 | Correction - a 10 MW project would require circa 28 BCF for a 25 year lifespan according to TLOU presentation. | npwharf | |
10/9/2018 12:12 | mdalos1 - is what way are the 2P figures fake ? In the last CPR, SRK Consulting, stated that the 2P (Proved and Probable) Gas Reserves increased 944% to 40.8 billion cubic feet ('BCF') (previously 3.9 BCF). That means there is at least a 50% probability that the amount recovered will equal or exceed 40.8 BCF. A 10 MW project would require circa 30 BCF for a 25 year lifespan. Conversely, whilst there is up to a 50% probability that the amount recovered will be under 40.8 BCF you can't conclude that means zero, it could be 38 BCF. Obviously the lower the BCF figure you anticipate the lower the probability you have of being correct. | npwharf | |
10/9/2018 10:16 | 10mw is pathetic - and disingenuously dressed up as an initial scalable first power approach. The fact Tlou still stick to such an unambitious starting target is why II interest here will be hard to drum up. Those of you saying they can use the 10mw revenue to collateralise future projects are perhaps conveniently ignoring the principles of economies of scale in the delivering the supporting infrastructure upon which they plan to leverage everything upwards. I have only been saying it for a year now. 409m shares in issue and counting. Great article on Shell strategy in Daily T today. | donkey40 | |
10/9/2018 10:04 | They state in their presentation their reserves are adequate for a 10MW plant for many years. so are they lying. i dont think do. | money4me | |
10/9/2018 09:45 | Here is my interpretation of disingenuous - constantly promoting the point the company has proven reserves, saying these increased by near 1000% in the unproven category and when getting a chance to pitch for the first commercial Offtake, telling the market a softly softly 10mw scalable approach makes more sense as it allows them to win bigger offtakes later at higher pricing. Do they think the folks at Ministry are both stupid and don’t read social media. The cheerleaders and promoters starting this whole thing going around - with Tidd as orchestrator in chief on the boards and unofficial site of sh1te - well now it has come around. If markets globally have an October moment or two, a 2p or 3p opportunity may well come around as well. Only an idiot would stand up and keep defending what’s happening here - some may remember I started talking about sheep well over a year ago.... | donkey40 | |
10/9/2018 08:18 | Can you explain 'fake' in this context? Perhaps you know more than the industry experts who do the analysis?! I doubt it though. I think you are being a little disingenuous - tlou is a junior player and as such will not have huge 1P figures to report yet, without the further exploration to convert the 2P and 3P figures. That takes time and is exactly what Tlou are embarking on. | mgellie | |
10/9/2018 07:34 | Honest mistake? Are you serious? That was part of a deliberate smear against tidd and you know it. Even more embarrassed for you. | mgellie | |
10/9/2018 07:31 | I wouldn’t talk technical to IT MGellie, IT still hasn’t fathomed out what a Seismic is for. | wheniamfree | |
09/9/2018 23:58 | Honest mistake - they are allowed. Except for toads like you that pop your head up every so often, let loose and then disappear down the hole again. You could not talk technical on Tlou if you tried. All you know is what you been brain-washed by others in the flock. But you will be happy in their company, on your back looking up at the blue sky that never happened, wondering how and where it all went so horribly wrong for you all. PS how many more warning signs or excuses do you need. Wakey wakey potato head. | donkey40 | |
09/9/2018 18:22 | Love blisters “look at me I was right!” Posts. As if guessing guessing that some bad news might arrive for a company in exploration phase and listed on AIM isn’t a very safe bet | satsuma1 | |
09/9/2018 17:22 | mdalos, are you able to explain to me why most O&G assets are valued around their 2P/3P reserves with potential upside considered against the contingent 2C/3C resources? As posted earlier, perhaps it best to come back when you understand what you are talking about. | wheniamfree | |
08/9/2018 20:05 | It isn’t my reason for posting. | donkey40 | |
08/9/2018 18:42 | I don't think they do it for financial gain they just do it to cause mayhem on the board for some kind of sick pleasure. | inthepub | |
08/9/2018 18:11 | As someone said earlier you have only a very basic (and misguided) understanding of what 1P 2P and 3P actually mean. I suggest you do a bit more research of their definition. Then we can discuss calcs! | the manini | |
08/9/2018 17:03 | So you think those not agreeing with all the positive comments are therefore posting to simply discredit the company for their financial gain. Tell me bright spark, how do you think I would gain by the share price dropping much further ? I will say this - Tlou does not have sufficient proven reserves to run a 100mw power station as you claim. If they did, they sure as blazes would not be bidding for 10 first up. No doubt they will firm up reserves as we go forward, and probably substantially so. But you posts suggesting proven reserves are far more dangerous and misleading than anything I post here regarding proper representation of what is going on within this company. | donkey40 | |
08/9/2018 15:48 | The level of conversation on here from the derampers is pathetic. Oil & gas conpanies are an industry ripe for this kind of exploitation lies or even just basic ignorance of the facts because definitions of resources and reserves with their associated hierarchy of levels is not even agreed at an International level. Definitions vary between trading blocs and overarching organisations. It is no wonder then that the understanding of the average investor is limited. Add in the ulterior motives that many post with and it's almost impossible to see the wood for the trees!A quick calculation shows that TLOU has proved and probable resources 2C to run a full 100MW power station for around 40 years with 3C resources for much much more. They are tendering for just an initial 10MW plant with the aim being to grow this incrementally as gas prices rise.The cancelled tender and subsequent re-tendering process and now four week tender submission delay by the Botswanan government has produced a unique opportunity to buy in to TLOU at a fantastic price and I have taken full advantage of this. I hold and will continue to accumulate. PDYOR and ignore the posters on here unfairly and malevolently trying to discredit the company for their own financial gain. | the manini |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions