Tlou Energy Share Discussion Threads

[donkey40] 31/8/2018 21:09

And I am off filter ..... Ah, this is just toooooooo easy.

[donkey40] 31/8/2018 21:08

Versarien (never heard of them), Tesla (my god, you want to associate EV with global reach with Tlou and 10MW of gas in Botswana that was announced mid 2016 and over 2 years later and one failed tender and another, likely to be delayed, just ahead) and Kenmare with annual revenues of $250+m.

It genuinely is scary just how stupid you are + incapable of disassociating your dislike of me from being able to post rationally and intelligently.

Your defence mechanism is to preach about other companies - this is Tlou board and I am happy to talk about Tlou. Like i said - you are increasingly scared I am right all along and ..... you, well if you allowed your dislike of me to blind you, then you missed the chance to sell previously. Basically YRF ! Sorry for your loss.

[wheniamfree] 31/8/2018 20:54

Only reason you are off filter was because Satsuma called you out and I wanted to see what else you had got wrong.

Don’t trip over your own ego, there are far more switched on investors than yourself who know how the markets work. Especially the small caps, most have little to no revenues - I’ll give you a fresh example - Versarien, £232m with next to no revenue.

If you want bigger how about we take a look at Tesla, burning through $billions and loss making yet capitalised at around $52bn - how does that work for you?

Instead of playing the big “I AM” and preaching all your sanctimonious and self righteous rubbish why don’t you move on and let the company deliver? You did not foresee the delay by government, the company didn’t and nor did anyone else.. you peddled the same sillyness when the shares rose from 6p to 17p and even then you told everyone you were right despite the shares shooting off without you.

You don’t really have a moral high ground, if we look at your investment in Kenmare over the last two years that has actually fallen 20% and then moved close back to flat despite historically a debt for equity restructure, consolidation and a circa 98% right down.

With a historic investment such as this, please spare us your wisdom oh wise one.

[donkey40] 31/8/2018 20:28

Well i guess the free float isn’t as tight as the cheerleaders here all thought. Mind you, 1.1m shares traded on AIM is only £70k value. Pretty pathetic really for a company that is fully funded (3 times over), about to bid for 100mw power station tender in a one horse race, with an amazing BOD that discover gas and sell it quick and get rich.

My view, for what it is worth, is that the market is increasingly realising the great fundamentals of this company will take a very long time to be achieved. And given there are no major institutional shareholders on the register (TG and AFrica A hold 10% of total - who is next after that then?), the many retail punters (if they have a brain - and don’t listen to False Prophets) are starting to trickle elsewhere... Volume and trading pattern this week sure suggests that.

And best of all - and really I do hate gloating - BUT since there are a few prize chumps still looking to talk it up so they can get out at less of a loss (or nowhere near the profit they anticipated) - I TOLD YOU SO !!!

10mw is maybe $10m annual revenue - with 400m shares already issued and a load more likely to part finance downstream (the partners have been USELESS) - if you can’t do the math, then sorry but I am fed up trying to help up get to the obvious landing point.

[mr.oz] 31/8/2018 07:13

Momentum starting to build in ASX?
Up to 13Cents overnight

[wheniamfree] 31/8/2018 05:33

Take it up with the experts that are SRK, the company who have past 30 years experience in the field and are acting independently.

I’d assume they know what they are doing however having called them all liars before and claimed they were wrong I assume your stating the same again?

Baring in mind this is coming from you, the same person who doesn’t know what a seismic survey is for? Give it a rest, you would argue black was white it if was written in an RNS from Tlou.

I see you have changed your subject after being made to look like a right idiot with your claims of post deletions on LSE? The point being - nobody has forgotten and as per your arguments above where you pretend to understand what you are talking about - you are still an idiot.

Mamba isn’t based on just a core hole and a small portion of seismic, it is factored in as an extension from the Selemo pilot wells given that the coal seam continuously runs into the portion of the claim they have tested. The boundary line of the permitting block is not based on geophysics ergo, since the seam is continuous the recoverable reserves already booked can be attributed and defined for both areas.

It’s like you said though, you aren’t the expert. Then perhaps it’s best not to question things you don’t understand?

[donkey40] 30/8/2018 23:43

Reserves must be discovered (by drilling), recoverable (with current technology), remaining in the subsurface (at the effective date of the evaluation) and “commercial221; based on the development project proposed.

Contingent Resources: potentially recoverable volumes associated with a development plan that targets discovered volume but is not (yet) commercial (as defined above);

Not many can drill 1 core hole and go straight to Reserves.

[wheniamfree] 30/8/2018 20:50

No you aren’t but again, just to help - the contingent RESOURCE you are referring to is yet to be recalculated by SRK and will be completed as part of a larger assessment.

Next issue?

[donkey40] 30/8/2018 17:40

I found the detail of the Final Results interesting in places.

MD report says he welcomes a Bots entity as our largest shareholder (19.23m shares) yet the Results and website show TG is largest shareholder with 21.7m shares.

In the Annual Reserves Statement, this shows reserves for Lesedi and a small amount for Mamba leases. And in the Resources part below, lots for Lesedi and Nil for Mamba. So somehow SRK are able to claim Reserves for Mamba from the source data (one core hole and some seismic) obtained, but unable to say these are part of a wider Resource.

But I ain’t the expert - as I am frequently told...

[donkey40] 29/8/2018 15:15

Aw jeez and Windbag trotting out his same old sh1te.
News rich period ahead; great BOD; not long now; free float tightening;

Come on man - change the record. Give me some new material to have a go at you about.

PS still think they are fully funded ??

[wheniamfree] 29/8/2018 14:16

Nice strong day today - not long until submission now.

Can see steady rises in the coming weeks, news rich period ahead!

[donkey40] 29/8/2018 13:33

Quick, hurry up and buy. Again. 6p won’t last forever. Traded 8p when tender submitted Sept 2017; one month later they punted it all the way up to 17p, then through no fault of the company Olde MacDonald stumbled back to 8p on tender cancellation. Stuck there for 4 months. Stumbled again to 6p during the well disguised rights issue - but tender submission Again 2 weeks today so time to get all excited again.
It will come good one of these days. Maybe. Keep a look out for Tidd’s return - then we will all know its time to play.

Actually the clever people are /have been quietly buying now/recently.

[uncle andy] 29/8/2018 12:49

Tlou Energy Limited, the AIM, ASX and BSE listed company focused on delivering power in Botswana and Southern Africa through the development of coal bed methane ("CBM") projects, has released a presentation given today by Tlou's General Manager Solomon Rowland, at the Africa Oil Gas & Energy Australia Conference being held in in Perth, Western Australia

hxxp://tlouenergy.com/presentations

[money4me] 29/8/2018 12:12

lets hope it can double from here by Christmas

[adorling] 29/8/2018 11:43

Consistent buying today ahead of multiple newsflow in September and Q4. Price representing incredible value at 6.5p given significant reserves, government tender opportunity and gas supply into Botswana and South Africa - all being driven by a “been there, done that, created $billion value Companies” before Management Team.

[mgellie] 25/8/2018 08:11

Haha! What an embarrassment