We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thalassa Holdings Limited | LSE:THAL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG878801114 | ORD SHS USD0.01 (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 26.50 | 25.00 | 28.00 | 26.50 | 26.50 | 26.50 | 263 | 08:00:11 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oil & Gas Field Services,nec | 252k | -891k | -0.1121 | -2.36 | 2.11M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/9/2019 16:11 | Sleepy knows of what he speaks. | rndm355 | |
10/9/2019 15:22 | gfrae - perhaps there is a good reason for the valuation | sleepy | |
10/9/2019 14:29 | These shares are currently valued at only the same as their cash in the bank, which is only half of their NAV, with perhaps another 20p due from GWP in the near future. | gfrae | |
28/8/2019 09:28 | Exceptional administration costs were $0.6m (1H18: nil) and were all in connection with the Lapsed Offer to acquire The Local Shopping REIT plc. Ego costs part one, part two will be in next accounts | hindsight | |
28/8/2019 08:38 | HHmm interesting LSR valued at 21.5p per share in the accounts Tax avoidance at it's very best | ntv | |
19/6/2019 16:29 | Nice to get some good news for a change. | tanneg | |
17/6/2019 10:38 | Hindsight How right you are. I have sold most of my shares recently at about 80p. I bought LSR shares with part of the proceeds as a form of "arbitrage" and am now showing a 5% loss on these. So I don't feel that I have been very clever. For THAL shareholders (except perhaps Mr S) and for LSR shareholders it would have made sense for THAL to accept the LSR cash offered and move on. As it is, both companies are wasting money on lawyers and it is difficult to see a happy outcome. | varies | |
17/6/2019 10:16 | Suggest shareholders of Thal ask the company how much this crusade with LSR has cost so far. The cost being two fold, firstly thier own costs and secondly the lose on the LSR holding value | hindsight | |
10/5/2019 09:16 | LOL cancelled all the preference shares I wonder if we will reissue them when he sees it fit to run off with the cash The good thing about the internet is it is not like books, it remembers what people do He forced minor shareholder to sell their shares in THAL because their shares were effectively worthless following the issue of the preference shares then he started buying up the cheap shares and now he has cancelled the prefs A nice honest days works well done to THAL I HOPE AMERICAN AND HIS LAWYER NOW SUES THEM HOW THE LSE ALLOWED THIS BUNCH ON THE MAIN MARKET IS AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE | ntv | |
02/5/2019 15:48 | Not sure what information they are dreaming about, but they got all mine as sent me loads of junk paperwork, email and a phone call. Dread to think at what cost to Thal shareholders but we know what its cost us Lsr holders (which is also loss on top of a loss for thal shareholders) | hindsight | |
02/5/2019 13:22 | Some thoughts on latest developments. Thalassa threatens LSR officers with possible imprisonment: | rndm355 | |
31/3/2019 20:37 | Page 41 - about £0.5m on the offer and about £0.5m on legal advice. Ouch! | topvest | |
31/3/2019 20:33 | Interesting indeed. A very well put together document. Unfortunately, the defence and legal process on this and the court plan is likely to be costing quite a material sum and so shareholders appear to be in a lose/lose more situation. I do hope that Soukup gets defeated as he is a very untrustworthy individual. I reluctantly sold at about 30p less commission. Should have sold LSR much earlier. What an awful, albeit thankfully small, investment it was! | topvest | |
28/3/2019 07:40 | He has jacked by the THAL share price by restarting the buy back but if he stops the buy back at any point the THAL share price will drop like a stone He will probably do that to get at LSR's cash Maybe another preference share issue or some other devious plan to get at your money YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED | ntv | |
13/3/2019 12:20 | LSR - response - an interesting read if you have half an hour to spare! | sailing john | |
12/3/2019 14:33 | "The Board believes that the dual listing will benefit existing shareholders by making the Company's shares more accessible to European investors and thereby improving liquidity. The Board also believes that ensuring the Company's shares are tradeable on an EU regulated market will avoid any impediment to using the Company's shares as consideration for cross-border acquisitions which might otherwise arise as a result of Brexit." Luxembourg listing... Brexit is the reason, superficially, but, really, is it? | frazboy | |
06/3/2019 16:00 | SteMis Thanks. I am glad we agree. gfrae. It is indeed possible that LSR shareholders will be stuck with their shares if the offer is rejected and Mr Soukup continues to be obstructive but I cannot see why he would want THAL to be locked in alongside everyone else. He would surely want THAL to take its share of the LSR cash and move on. I only wish he had accepted this sensible solution in the first place. There is always a risk in an arbitrage, usually of one party failing to fulfil his side of a deal, but I prefer LSR shares to THAL shares at current prices. | varies | |
06/3/2019 15:35 | If the bid is not accepted then you could be stuck with LSR shares trading at 27p or less whilst Thal shares might rise,possibly considerably. | gfrae | |
06/3/2019 13:43 | I agree. The disparity between the two prices seems madness. There's some uncertainty because we don't know the exact details of the offer, but it seems hard to see how a THAL shareholder could lose by selling THAL and buying LSR. I haven't been a THAL shareholder for a while and wouldn't really want to be one again, other than short term, but I bought some LSR for the arbitrage about 3 weeks ago at 27.2p net. | stemis | |
06/3/2019 13:04 | On further reflection I find that the offer for LSR cannot make sense for THAL shareholders. We are told that the asset value of THAL is well above the current share price : over 120p, I believe. For this reason THAL is buying its own shares in. Yet, as has been pointed out here, the value indicated by LSR's current share price is much lower. Taking 28.5p an offer of 14.64p cash plus 26/100ths of a THAL share indicates a value of only 53.3p for a THAL share. If the offer succeeds, there will be many disgruntled former LSR shareholders eager to sell their THAL shares on any substantial rise and this is likely to be a dampener for some time. At the risk of proving too clever, I have sold some THAL at 80.5p and put the money into LSR at 28.5p. Unfortunately the purchase attracts stamp duty of 0.5% but this "arbitrage" seems hard to resist. If THAL go away, LSR shareholders should eventually receive over 30p but the wait may be a long one ! If the offer succeeds, I stand to recover half my outlay in cash and the cancellation of THAL's preference shares would make its ordinary shares less unattractive. | varies | |
05/3/2019 11:37 | Like everyone else here I wish that THAL had voted for the liquidation of LSR and had not issued preference shares that strengthen Mr Soukup's control of our company. On re-reading the announcement made on 6 Feb of the preliminary results for the year to 31.12.2018 I see that "the THAL board also wishes to advise the market that the preference shares issued on 30 Sept 2018 and announced on 4 Oct 2018 will be cancelled upon successful completion of the LSR offer". The offer documents are due to be sent out by tomorrow. Mr Soukup seems an obstinate and difficult man but perhaps the LSR position will be resolved within a few weeks and, if the preference shares are indeed cancelled, the market may look more favourably on THAL ordinary shares. The best solution for us would be a sale of the Flying Nodes project followed by the liquidation of THAL. This seems unlikely to happen. | varies | |
13/2/2019 21:01 | Perhaps the Reit status of LSR is worth a few p to THAL? | gfrae | |
13/2/2019 19:15 | Probably good reasons why you wouldn't want to be a minority shareholder in a THAL controlled LSR... | stemis | |
13/2/2019 18:10 | Happy to be corrected on any of the points in the post below if folk think they're wrong - a lot of the detail is from memory. And we don't of course know for sure why Thalassa issued preference shares or why they chose to list on the main market. | frazboy | |
13/2/2019 18:03 | No one really knows what DS thinks, we know what he writes, but we don't know what he thinks.What we do know is this...On the positive side:Thalassa got a good price for WGPOn the negative side:No specific cause has been provided as to why Thalassa needs extra cash resources (which it would acquire from LSR if the bid is successful).LSR's shareholders, with the exception of Thalassa, voted overwhelmingly to have the company liquidated and their cash returned.Thalassa appears to have paid early to mid 30s for its LSR stake (source RNS at the time of purchases).DS was exceptionally well remunerated in both 2017 and 2016 (source company accounts) receiving far higher director remuneration than might have been expected given the value of the assets under management. No breakdown of director remuneration has been provided for 2018.The Thalassa investment trust still owes the company (from 2018 accounts) ~$1.5m (despite most of the loan being written off) from the loan the company gave the trust to buy shares from DS a few years ago.Thalassa was, according to the 2017 accounts, still paying the rent for Eastleigh court/stables as the contract entered into in 2014 was for 10 years (unless WGP has picked up the contract?) - the owner of the property is a company owned by Duncan Soukup.Francis Smulder was also well remunerated in 2017 (source company accounts) given the size of the company. No breakdown of director remuneration has been provided for 2018.The company issued preference shares to concentrate power in the hands of the existing shareholders - the likely benefactors being DS and the Thalassa investment trust.The company listed on the main market to bypass having to obtain shareholder approval for the LSR (and possibly other) transactions.The cash burn rate, for Thalassa, as calculated from the 2018 annual report and 2018 H1 accounts, is around $4m per annum, annualised. Unfortunately it's not clear what the money is being spent on.I'm not sure I would have supported a rights issue. | frazboy |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions