Tate & Lyle Share Discussion Threads

[ashraf1] 25/8/2009 09:57

tate lookig very week at the moment.
relative strengh index is at 82 which states a sell.
level 2 showing 65,000 want to buy and 264,000 want to sell.
can see this dropping quickly back to ...£3.70...to...£3.80...
the... bear flag ...is up at the moment on this stock.

[jab118] 21/8/2009 12:43

Mid -long term, nice to see your in profit, gucci, i was expecting a pull back to 370 when it hit 410 the other day, but fell to 383, so good entry.

As you can see, I've been in these from 260ish level and this board went from quiet to quieter...:@)

[gucci] 19/8/2009 22:51

390p in my isa as mid - long term hold

[jab118] 18/8/2009 09:38

gucci.. well done mate, at what price was that if you dont mind me asking?

[gucci] 17/8/2009 18:22

bought some today

[jab118] 14/8/2009 10:58

Now we have hit the 400p target today, I would expect some profit taking, taking place and maybe an aggressive retrace soon.

I would reckon we could see 370p again...I hope not, but could be a good entry point, for any new bullish investors...

[jab118] 13/8/2009 15:14

close to that £4.00 level now, but with this bullish market up wards movement I have decided to hold ...

[jab118] 04/8/2009 16:26

nice title... and that was year 2000

you could have bought more of most things for 4.00 then, so this proves it;s a bargain now at this price ....

[jab118] 04/8/2009 10:26

ashraf1..

That's rubbish, this share is set for a surge upwards..

This is just a healthy retrace, I would imagine the mojority of holders/investors in this stock are holding tight..

This price is still relatively cheap, in comparision to the return in dividend payments...

[ashraf1] 04/8/2009 01:17

on its way down from here.

[jab118] 02/8/2009 14:55

I've been told, that The Daily Telegraph, has once again recommended TATE as a strong buy...

My experience from the Telegraphs share tips, would be about 1 in 5 good calls, so lets hope TATE is that 1....

We all know TATE, made the top 100 earlier in the year but for a short time with most investors selling in a worrying time scale, or was it Institutions shorting the hell out of it as well..

My thoughts are TATE we soon be back in soon, so we could hopefully see a massive upside in the share price from this level...

Would anyone like to try and deramp me :@)

[jab118] 31/7/2009 15:17

pump up the volume !!!>>>:@)

[jab118] 31/7/2009 11:12

The only way is up, and back in the FTSE 100... taking the place of BA in SEPT.

[the itch] 31/7/2009 09:24

I have to admit, I was looking here at around 300, though, nah, and looked back the otherday to see a 20% rise. Not bad for a company that lost its patent (or whatever it was) protection case.

Question is where from here?

[wendsworth] 31/7/2009 08:28

Well done those who've stuck with it. Fortunately my switch into Lloyds has paid off handsomely as well.

[jab118] 24/7/2009 09:53

guys & gals

looks like we have found some thermals, how much higher before we hit some turbulence.......... :@)

[jab118] 23/7/2009 19:57

losses... like to hold and ride the high tide.... one way ticket, this was grossly oversold when it was in top 100..

bloody sound as £4... :@)

[losses] 23/7/2009 17:35

This one ain't coming down anytime soon...400+

[lurgy] 23/7/2009 17:35

i hope you don't :) .. ah, hell, we can both win can't we :))

[jab118] 23/7/2009 14:23

ashraf1 ..

So your saying you have sold and gone short.. lol brave call hope you benifit from it...:@)

[ashraf1] 23/7/2009 14:09

this is a strong short from here.
relative strengh indicator is showing 75 which will bring in the bears .
will have a big drop from here befor it goes back up .
i have locked in my profits....a profits a profit....

[jab118] 23/7/2009 12:50

lurgy..

I'm not much of a chartist, all aload of squiggly lines to me, but from my last 12 month tack record, every share I have sold at a profit has only kept rising afterwards, with the dividend maintained and better than expected results, it would be a shame if this falls back.

I'm feeling this could well hit 400p very soon ...:@)

[lurgy] 23/7/2009 12:40

Jab, no, that's not a gap fill. You have to have the gap first, then the fill later. Contrary to popular charting wisdom, gaps do not always have to fill.

You're probably right wendsworth, but I'm holding, as I went in with a target and want to stick to it (for once!)