Symphony Environmental T... Share Discussion Threads

[begorrah88] 18/9/2014 12:47

'idiots like Begorrah'?

What an extraordinary statement to make about someone who challenges your blinkered view.

Not really a level headed and rational debater are you bbd2?

You really shouldn't flatter yourself that I give a monkeys cuss who you are - once again you've made an incorrect assumption.

[bbd2] 18/9/2014 09:49

Blatant Ramper ? LOL - you need new glasses.

Robert,

Why on earth would a private investor like myself want to expose my personal life to idiots like Begorrah on a free BB? I have been on ADVFN since 2004 with one username - enough said I think.

[robertnash2] 18/9/2014 07:43

bbd2 that was a good one, why do you hide behind bbd2? This site would be far more interesting if individuals had the guts to use their given names....how about it?

[begorrah88] 18/9/2014 05:53

Long reply bbd2?What is it you want to hear?That blatant ramping is not something I approve of and will say so when I see it?Blnx is a fine case in point. Rampers like you lured loads of people into throwing money at blnx all the way up to £2.20 and it now sits at 40p.They tried to attack anyone that didn't sing the rampy song and forced any questioning posts off the threads.A very unsavoury practice. Not dissimilar to what you and TB have been doing here but with less ferocity.

[bbd2] 17/9/2014 22:09

Oh dear - Neilrr replies with one of his other usernames LOL- why would someone have more than one username ? Almost as bad as Begorrah88 with his band of merry men on the BLNX thread. Very illuminating indeed. Can't wait for the long reply LOL Classic.


robertnash2
17 Sep'14 - 19:13 - 4563 of 4564 0 0


Neilrr whilst I always find your posts entertaining I do think the last one was rather below the belt. Surely you would be better off suggesting helplines to some of the Board!




Juicin Drumroll

17 Sep'14 - 20:50 - 4564 of 4564 0 0


Sorry if you find it a bit much RN, I couldn't resist the snot bubble.

[juicin drumroll] 17/9/2014 20:50

Sorry if you find it a bit much RN, I couldn't resist the snot bubble.

[robertnash2] 17/9/2014 19:13

Neilrr whilst I always find your posts entertaining I do think the last one was rather below the belt. Surely you would be better off suggesting helplines to some of the Board!

[neilrr] 17/9/2014 10:25

Poor Annie's being bullied.

Quick, call Childline.

[robertnash2] 17/9/2014 08:22

Anne69 I have checked all your posts and mine, I can see no bullying, even to the extent I would refer to the following post regarding the forthcoming AGM.

Anne69 - 29 Apr 2014 - 12:46:53 - 4447 of 4561
Unfortunately I'm in Manchester on Friday on business but would have liked to attend to see what is said about current trading etc. AGM's are a good place to ask the directors what is going on in more detail than they would normally publish.

Ax

[begorrah88] 17/9/2014 08:09

AnneVery quick to play the bully card no?It is ok for you to knock other posters but the moment you are asked to justify your opinions you back out of the debate and claim bullying.Not really the robust response from someone genuinely believing their position and passionately expressing it.The same happened with TB - when challenged he ran away.You may be right and it may be best to filter you (odd that that didn't cross your mind rather than having a pop at posts you didn't agree with!).Shame though as I'd much rather you engaged in an open and honest debate in a civilised manner than running away when you are asked to qualify your comments.

[robertnash2] 16/9/2014 21:25

Anne69 with respect when have I bullied you?

[anne69] 16/9/2014 21:14

Beg/Neil/Rob - you men need to get out more. I will not be bullied off this or any other bb. If you don't want to read my posts then filter me. Just because you shout the loudest and have the most extreme views does not make your views right.

You guys appear to be much more emotionally connected to Sym and the board members than anyone else on this bb.

Ax

[robertnash2] 15/9/2014 20:15

WHAT HAS CHANGED??? Not much, interesting post from Dec 2005

Change of management (SYM)

Bismila 29 Dec'05 - 12:00 0 0

I think the only way this organisation can go where it should be by rights - with a product that appeals to most conservationists - is if the current management was replaced with one which is proactive and willing to go out and sell the product to very large consumers. I personally think it is time for The Managing Direct to go gracefully for the sake of us investors.

[robertnash2] 15/9/2014 11:55

Last RNS besides shareholdings and corporate matters was August 2013 about Janssens Pharmiceutical a division of Johnson and Johnson. Has anything materialised from this agreement?

[robertnash2] 15/9/2014 08:18

Maybe the BoD should approach SYMPHONY TECHNOLOGY GROUP.
"They transform companies into highly profitable global businesses by investing in innovation and building significant customer value"

[robertnash2] 15/9/2014 07:55

Why delay issuing the interim results, we are now in the second half of September?
Does one assume they are not as good as expected? If they were they could have improved the share price

[begorrah88] 15/9/2014 06:57

Anne

That would be a perfectly reasonable and understandable post were it not for the fact that just prior to it you posted this:


Anne69
11 Sep'14 - 18:14 - 4542 of 4551 0 0

Why does this negative chat always happen every time the share price moves (or starts to show signs of moving) upwards?

Ax


When the share price was not moving [or starting to show signs of moving]upwards.

Not the first time you've shown your colours only to try and blend into the background when you've been caught out.

I'm afraid this 'I'm just an investor' doesn't wash with me.

It is all hugely irrelevant as nothing said by posters on a BB board is likely to have a material impact on the share price but at least people can be aware of the 'influence' some posters are trying to exert on the SYM thread.

There appear to be two camps

1.Those that question the absence of progress and some of the curious goings on at board level such as loans etc.

2.Those that defend the board at all costs and appear oblivious to any shortcomings.

It is the eagerness of those in the second camp to try and undermine those in the first that leaves a bad taste in the mouth and concerns about their motivation.

[anne69] 14/9/2014 14:29

Begorrah - you are wrong. I have no links or association with the board whatsoever and I have never been an employee, board member, customer or supplier. I am simply a shareholder and bought well at around 4p. Whilst I am sitting on a decent profit I want to see much better liqidity otherwise selling will just lead to a fall in the share price. I want to see more people investing - the share price is heavily dependent on supply and demand. Contracts and sales are a critical element here and with a board that seems reluctant to supply the market with sales information, I have tried to provide some information which may be helpful in creating some visibility. You can ignore these if you don't think they are relevant or useful - I am not forcing you to agree and I don't give an opinion on their significance. I am merely trying to establish if Sym has momentum on its side or not. The more Internet traffic maybe the more momentum. I know this is not scientific but best I can do with such little coming out of the company.

Ax

[begorrah88] 13/9/2014 06:20

Doesn't quite ring true Anne.

You initially presented a logical and reasonable position. Now that I've looked back over your posts I can see the TB agenda. Strikingly similar eagerness to post links to tenuous 'deals'.

If it wasn't for the readiness to shout down anyone who questions the,groundhog day style lack of progress at SYM, I wouldn't really have noticed but now that I have I can only see someone with 'sympathies' to the board that haven't been clearly stated.

[anne69] 12/9/2014 22:03

Begorrah - no I simply want to see the share price rise - like all shareholders.

Ax

[begorrah88] 12/9/2014 17:01

....and that answer was?

[bbd2] 12/9/2014 15:45

Begorrah, I refer you to the answers I gave you at the beginning of 2013 about the same topic. You will recall it was about the same time that you told this BB that you held no position in SYM but were just spending your time providing the BB "with balance".

Robert , Have a good break and thank you.

[begorrah88] 12/9/2014 07:42

bbd2

You appear to have side stepped my simple question again.I also note you had no comment on being pulled up on attributing comments to me that I haven't said.

Still didn't get an answer as to why TB was never challenged about all his blatant ramping and yet anyone that questions the merits of the BoD gets hounded?

Perhaps you could clear this up if you want to be seen as a man of his word.