Sefton Resources Share Discussion Threads

[iain g] 31/1/2008 10:43

it's so easy to do....

& so much better than engaging with the old bod,

[markinthepark] 31/1/2008 10:39

it's so easy to do....

yas0 - 31 Jan'08 - 10:38 - 12125 of 12125 (Filtered)

[yas0] 31/1/2008 10:38

Rel,

But you have been telling me for two years that soon the facts will be out, the share price will rise and I shall have egg on my face.

As yet, as numptyJudi used to remind you, I have called it right. Hence why I am still here with no egg on my face. Moreover, I do not see myself being placed in such a position.

The gracious fellow knows what he is doing.

[markinthepark] 31/1/2008 10:34

Rel,

I agree 100%...but in the meantime would you be willing to filter him and avoid these never ending arguments he keeps manufacturing here, please?

[relishing] 31/1/2008 10:33

mark,

As time goes on and the company makes progress, it is becoming easier and easier to show yas0 up for what he is, as his efforts become increasingly desperate and obtuse.

As I said, it will finally be 'game over' for him once the facts and figures in the public domain overwhelm his ability to obfuscate, for that is what he will do, whether people respond to him or not. So why not untwist his twisting when the opportunity is presented on a plate.

[markinthepark] 31/1/2008 10:28

red,

Yes indeed it is a nice change to see this blue for 2 days...and these buyers should be getting a bargain at these levels if all really is as good as it seems to be based on others conversations with SER management.....

[yas0] 31/1/2008 10:28

UK,

Any comment on the markets? No, thought not.

[uknighted] 31/1/2008 10:28

MITP Stop bickering :-)

[yas0] 31/1/2008 10:28

Dear New Readers,

Fleabag yesterday claimed to have spoken to the company. I know not if this is true, since others have stated the same and then removed their posts.

However, if it is true, I remind you of his summary at the end of his rather long winded waffle. He wrote ''The share price ain't gonna move anywhere fast.''

That is one aspect of his post that I agree with.

[redhill] 31/1/2008 10:26

Thats right but there are some buyers this morning and level 2 is looking quite healthy.

[markinthepark] 31/1/2008 10:23

well done iain g.....

[iain g] 31/1/2008 10:22

yas0 - 31 Jan'08 - 10:10 - 12107 of 12107 (Filtered)

[unimog] 31/1/2008 10:16

Yaso. Is that because you did'nt want to see Flea mention the missing part.
Read on.. Post 12083. Quote

Morning.
MT, He gave the impression that they weren't there yet, but were close.
I didn't ask 'Has the steaming started' but he did go on at length about it.
I seem to remember him saying some abouta BTU unit/part being what they needed.
It was said in the past tense.

As you'd hope he was quite passionate when I first called him, but he spent 15 mins on the phone to me.
My view hasn't changed. Long term this has significant potential, but until we see real progress on production leading to cashflow leading to profit. The share price ain't gonna move anywhere fast.

Flea

[relishing] 31/1/2008 10:15

mark,

"Just ignore him please and he will go away eventually..........."

Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be true, but he will go away eventually once the facts and figures in the public domain overwhelm his ability to obfuscate.

[uknighted] 31/1/2008 10:14

Yas0 You say "'inconsistent', not inconsistant"
I say remember not "remeber".
If you live by the sword......
Regards
UK
edit - nice editing of lease/least.

[relishing] 31/1/2008 10:12

iain,

He's just trying to cloud things as usual by deliberately confusing two seperate issues.

[markinthepark] 31/1/2008 10:12

Keep it sane.....

yas0 - 31 Jan'08 - 10:10 - 12107 of 12107 (Filtered)

[yas0] 31/1/2008 10:10

'inconsistent', not inconsistant.

There has never been any mention from Sefton in a formalised rns (at least not as far as I am aware) of a protracted delay due to a missing part.

Why, if that is the case, did Iaing remove his post. Moreover, I do not recall Felabag stating anything about a missing part. He lay the blame at the doorstep of a previous operator.

It is obvious - bulls on here are in a bit of a muddle and cannot remeber what they have said.

Further you write ''this aint going to 4p''.

I shall remind you of this in due course.

[iain g] 31/1/2008 10:06

relishing

I note my name been used is 'the veggy' having a senior moment ?

[bobbyg2] 31/1/2008 10:05

yas0

they all said the failure to use the gas for steaming was a water problem tripping the steam genny. This is not inconsistant with the previous owner doing something odd with the well as stated by flea.

They all said the delay in using the propane was waiting for a part.

Now go away and stop trying to confuse, complicate and scare people, your desperation is getting more obvious by the post.

Dont bother replying I have no intention of spending the next hour 'playing he said, she said' with you quoting partially and out of context in an attempt to discombobulate people.

Oh and you can stick your friends (yeah right, who you kiddin!) charts where the monkey sticks his nuts - this aint going to 4p and is a news driven share.

[mickey take] 31/1/2008 10:05

Rel- I have given you MY HONEST opinion of the steaming affair and what the company have reported.

If you believe them then that is your prerogative – Its silly to suggest that the steamer was purchased to fool people/ investors.

The only fooling around that's taking place now is the company are scrambling for excuses to explain the delay in start up due to their errors.