Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh123] 30/8/2018 15:59

ineptico,
i repeat, it has nothing to do with Genentech.... As you well know, you were talking about the Modi trials and used the word " IF ", when you have ALWAYS argued that the trials WILL BE successful, so... if , as you have continually argued, the trials are a foregone conclusion, why would you use the word " IF " because that would not only suggest, it would confirm that there are risks .... its a really simple question ineptico.

It would appear that you have been caught out by your own words , YET AGAIN.

[gazza] 30/8/2018 15:45

Dr D, no worries

[drdobson1] 30/8/2018 15:43

GaZZA you are right I do apologise for the hortle bit as it is a very serious business.Many of my army mates have suffered in many for s so please excuse the black humour on this subject.
It is the way sone ex military deal with it but he’s in poor taste.
Just wish he eoukd seek help in some way as a I am sure that he can be helped and I do fear the consequences of him ignoring the signs which are clear for the rest of us to see.

[inanaco] 30/8/2018 15:34

maybe its best if Boom explains to you Tosh

" IF they break the cancers ability to implement immune suppression ".

as Affimed has confirmed that synergy exists between PD1 and its products and they are now testing this combination ..

which is what is needed to Break tolerance

hence $90m for "if" ...

[tosh123] 30/8/2018 15:26

ineptico, i can both read and write, two basic elements that appear to be very difficult for you to grasp, even in your aging years.

As for explaining something to Genentech, what has that got to do with anything that has been posted ?
I merely asked YOU, and i now repeat my question, why you used the word " IF " when you have vehemently pronounced that the trials WILL be a success, therefore, your use of the word " IF " to describe a scenario that is a foregone conclusion is contradictory to all your other statements.... nothing to do with Genentech, so please at least try to stay focused, and answer , what is after all , a very simple question.

Definitely a question that any scientist or professor worth his salts could answer, in fact any primary school kid could also give it a stab as well.

[gazza] 30/8/2018 15:19

Dr D, You are correct, there is definately something not quite right there. Nothing to chortle about though (IMO)

[drdobson1] 30/8/2018 15:11

Invitation to baNANA to attend the AGM.
I think you are Mentally Ill Based on your Rants and irrational posting.
I would like the Opportunity to have aCONverstaion with you so that I can COzNfirm it once you open your mouth.
Chortle chortle ha ha

[inanaco] 30/8/2018 15:01

you best explain that to Genentech Tosh

who have just paid $90m for the opportunity to test "if"

[inanaco] 30/8/2018 14:54

you should learn to read Tosh

what exactly are you fearful of ?

its a question with a possible answer

waiting ?

[tosh123] 30/8/2018 14:49

Ineptico,
you've surely made a mistake because you have posted ;- " IF they break the cancers ability to implement immune suppression ".

I thought you said that you already knew the outcome, so why use the word " IF ", or are you finally agreeing that there is a possibility that the trials may not supply the total outcome needed ?
You cant have it both ways lad.

My my, the mighty ineptico finally backing down and accepting that he was wrong, now theres a thing.

I bet he tries to wriggle and squirm though. I put money on it.

[gazza] 30/8/2018 14:37

wriggle,wriggle,flap,flap,flounder lol

[tosh123] 30/8/2018 14:35

Ineptico,
which post did Ruck use the word " fearful " or that he wasn't prepared to " wait " ?

As is usual, you just make stuff up.

[wigwammer] 30/8/2018 14:19

I think we can all spot the "lull" of the day... :)"In my effort to make the 'underwaters' feel more 'at home' by introducing topics for discussion that may be more 'familiar' to their situation = FISHI thought "Flounder" was quite appropriate... being a FLAT FISH.So, how about = Lump*sucker* ???"

[the real lozan] 30/8/2018 14:06

"Saves? From what/who?" -
It appears EVIDENT by the 'disCONnected, illogical, jibberish', being posted by the 'Dead money specialists' and 'Underwater NAIVE trHYPERS and swallowers.'...that this manner of their posting claptrap, is their means of hiding their embarrassment resulting from the FAILURE of the attempt to 'belittle' those able to Get things RIGHT, and the STRESS of 'NOT being able to create a demand' due to 'The LULL'
that they didn't 'see = Was On The CARDS'

[inanaco] 30/8/2018 13:39

Gazza (ruckrover) ... is fearful of waiting ...

wonder if he gets stressed at a bus terminal ..

christ don't use the trains ...

[wigwammer] 30/8/2018 13:20

So sweet :)

[gazza] 30/8/2018 12:28

Saves? From what/who?

[wigwammer] 30/8/2018 12:23

Gaz saves lozan for the second day running :)

[the real lozan] 30/8/2018 11:44

Gash -
Would that be 'STING RAY' ???

[gazza] 30/8/2018 11:41

or should I say:

MANTRA RAY

[gazza] 30/8/2018 11:40

Something is very fishy here!
How about clownfish and don't forget Ray.

[the real lozan] 30/8/2018 10:21

In my effort to make the 'underwaters' feel more 'at home' by introducing topics for discussion that may be more 'familiar' to their situation = FISH
I thought "Flounder" was quite appropriate... being a FLAT FISH
.
So, how about = Lump*sucker* ???

[panama7] 30/8/2018 10:03

It would appear from Ivy's comments on LSE that if any Investors attend the AGM they have to get approval from Inanaco before they put any questions to the BOD.