ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

9.65
-0.10 (-1.03%)
07 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.10 -1.03% 9.65 9.30 10.00 9.75 9.65 9.75 542,863 10:14:22
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -7.48 89.53M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 9.75p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £89.53 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.48.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 19951 to 19972 of 67275 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  807  806  805  804  803  802  801  800  799  798  797  796  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
01/3/2019
14:52
Inan,"Stirred the swamp enough for one day .."Was that with your tail as you hauled yourself onto dry land?
gazza
01/3/2019
14:50
Loz, As someone who works with statistics and probability as a professional, could I politely point out that the "law of averages" is a fallacy.
gazza
01/3/2019
14:41
ElvLOSS has left the building
the real lozan
01/3/2019
14:27
anyway ...

Stirred the swamp enough for one day ..

I will leave the 3 amigo's who defected from the LSE to form the raving lunatic party ADFVN division .. to play ..

LOL

inanaco
01/3/2019
14:22
Your problem Tosh is you don't know ...

you play this game of make believe ... but to who ? to

Lozan and ONW

they are the only players that are stupid enough to engage you

i just find it amusing ...

after all you and ONW are holding for a deal ...

which means the Science does matter !!

PMSL

inanaco
01/3/2019
14:12
ONW
at 20p he ( and many other poor folk ) will still be underwater, hence why its irrelevant how many you hold, but its absolutely relevant how much you paid and paid to hold.

Loz, Very very funny.

tosh123
01/3/2019
14:12
O N W et al re 20023 -
This may account for HIS displeasure - should such a "recvery" fruish... it must be annoying for HIM to realise that = The WISER, more ASTUTE have the opportunity to 'Step-in, and Take the CREAM'...from under HIS nose.

the real lozan
01/3/2019
14:04
inane'n'co ...20015 -
"plans "approved" did not have a concrete ramp for wheelchairs ..so we had to cast the ramps to a door that was to narrow for a wheelchair"
,
T'would appear YOU have a history of 'problems' with YOUR...FLAWED RAMPS

the real lozan
01/3/2019
14:00
Loz,
The sad thing is that unless Scancell goes bust he will start incessantly crowing when we recover past (probably) about 20p.
Then he will maintain the vindication of his dogged determination to be "Right"
The great thing about that will be that all who hold at that point will be equally happy, and then his crowing will be irrelevant simply because most everyone else will be so damned relieved to be out of loss that he'll become an even greater spent force than now!
AIMO
ATB

oldnotwise
01/3/2019
13:55
Tosh et al -
The ONE thing *WE ALL* CAN identify with inane'n'co.. is HE IS at least CONsistant.
{ CONsistantly WRONG }
If *WE ALL* take on board the 'Laws of nature' / Science or knowledge of - 'General priciple formula or rule, describing a phenomenon'...*WE ALL* might opine =
By the 'Law of Averages'... HE 'must' eventually 'Get something RIGHT'
,
To date, the 'Law of Averages' appears yet to be PROVEN

the real lozan
01/3/2019
13:47
Rumour has it that he recently entered an "Ineptico look alike competition".......... and came last.
tosh123
01/3/2019
13:45
He doesn't like to lose.... which is a very unfortunate trait for one who seems to make a living out of losing.
tosh123
01/3/2019
13:44
ONW,
he's always WRONG, and then , as you say, spends post after post trying to wriggle out of his ludicrous statements by attempting to steer the conversation off topic ... its like a spoilt child... Pathetic.

Zero respect for the idiot...

tosh123
01/3/2019
13:18
Loz / ONW,
just another " he got it completely wrong " moment to add to the ever increasing list.
No one should be surprised that he got it wrong though, after all he's been 100% consistent with that over the last 7 years.

tosh123
01/3/2019
13:14
Can always remember Building control refusing to pass off £1m of buildings because the plans "approved" did not have a concrete ramp for wheelchairs ..so we had to cast the ramps to a door that was to narrow for a wheelchair

ONW "Working for the protection of Ramps"

inanaco
01/3/2019
13:05
Actual text ONW

The rate limiting step to answering all the questions received from the FDA relate to the Ichor Trigrid 2.0 device. Ichor is in dialogue with the FDA regarding responses to those questions, and this process is completely independent as it relates to the FDA’s device division. I appreciate this is a very frustrating situation but it is unfortunately out of our control.

That said, we are still planning on initiating the study in this first half.


so as far as i am concerned ONW it's only you "pontificating" again

inanaco
01/3/2019
13:04
Having spent my entire life dealing with Regulations and bureaucrats .... i know how pedantic they can be ..

Scancell has simplified it ...

they do not see an issue and expect the trial to start h1 ..

the only party that blows it up out of all proportion is you .. based on NO evidence at all

ATB

inanaco
01/3/2019
12:53
I could agree with the simplistic view you take. I could do that and say it's inevitable.
But if that's the case as you state, why then did the FDA require further information since according to you it's only a rubber stamp job, and if that were the case why has it overrun the expected timescale, and why were further details required by them in the first place?
I think you tend to oversimplify some issues and IMO this is one of them.
I certainly hope to see an outcome that we all wish for, but please don't pretend you have all the answers.... You don't!
AIMO
ATB

oldnotwise
01/3/2019
12:47
ONW ...

sorry ONW ... not sure what the biological difference between a DNA vaccine and a DNA vaccine is ... do you ?

only the gun is designed to open cells for the DNA to enter ...

Basically you are trying to BIG up an ISSUE

maybe you can explain the Biological part ? as that would then fall into the Clinical Drug side of the FDA

not the device side

inanaco
01/3/2019
12:37
Inanaco
It is NOT inevitable.
The questions raised are specific to the combination of the Trigrid V2 and the Biologic Agent being delivered.
If it were inevitable there wouldn't be any delay because there would be no questions to ask.
Sadly (or maybe not) the FDA have the whip hand here since they're the licensing authority, not Inanaco.
The FDA could conceivably keep this tied up for many months if not years should they choose to do so!
AIMO
ATB

oldnotwise
01/3/2019
12:28
As the Tri Grid device is already in trial in Europe, i have no issues that it will not be approved Lozan

the word is "inevitable"

"Pretty sure" was not a claim

as such the drawing Board is not required ...

inanaco
01/3/2019
12:23
So, the 'CLAIM' -
"Pretty sure that we will have the SCIB1 combo FDA rns by the 12th march "
Now AGAIN, seems AGAIN, to have been UNFOUNDED ???
Oh well ... back to the 'drawing board'
.
However, This time YOU seem prepared to ALMOST admit = YOU got something WRONG
AGAIN

the real lozan
Chat Pages: Latest  807  806  805  804  803  802  801  800  799  798  797  796  Older