Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:59

biggest threat to scancell is Labour .,.............

but not to scancell itself but the share price because it affects "investors"

and that is exactly what you are seeing .....

all this claptrap about keep the subject on Scancell forgets the investors

[ivyspivey] 18/11/2024 18:58

It was only for 15k shares so not claiming it was a big amount and do suggest you do not take the bet as I can happily sendo the contract note as proof.
It was purely to highlight you really need to be careful when calling people out when you really have no idea and just need to wind your neck in.
No doubt you will respond by saying it is only Pizza money but the point is if I buy back the shares I sold then I will have 10% more so proof you could have accumulated your 1.6 m at a much lower average.
ATB

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:57

Inan," his ability to argue without any evidence of what the future holds "The basis of most forecasting systems is the analysis of past events and patterns and projecting them forward. If you look at the history of biotech research companies you will find significant share dilution from start up to buy out. In the case of Scancell there has been 400% dilution in the past 12 years.I think my 100% factor is quite conservative.

[2tyke] 18/11/2024 18:56

That's ok miavoce...I know you do.

Actually...the last thing that SP's are to do with is 'science.'

And inane should stop talking about 'how many he owns'.
It's not a good look...or good position to be in !

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:55

""So the only thing that will stop the slide is clarity on funding. So do we need this NOW. Technically no, but the sooner this unknown is removed, the sooner the share price can find a sensible level.""

and forgets Calculus !!

Gazza your ability to shine bright is like a super Nova ..

Big Flash then fades away

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:53

Inan,"is this the point that labour blows up ?"So unable to debate the topic you attempt to disrupt and dilute the conversation with irrelevant political rantings.

[the real lozan] 18/11/2024 18:52

The 'name/AIM of the game' -
Ivy
As a result of your trade... Did you 'Make/Take' a profit ???

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:52

yep Gazza on a Roll now .... his ability to argue without any evidence of what the future holds is just incredible

100% 200% 300% dilution .,...

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:51

Inan, Of course I knew we needed funding for the reg trial, I've known for years. That's why I have 100% dilution factored into my share price estimates.

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:50

so Ivy how big was the trade ?

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:49

CT,"It is about the science as if it doesn't work it doesn't get to market."What's you specialism - the bleedin obvious? It's not ALL about the science. (I've added capitalisation to assist)

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:49

gazza full on "pontifications" he has the bit between the teeth

apparently last week he had no idea we needed funding for the reg trial

and Burbles "discovery" has got him all excited

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:47

is this the point that labour blows up ?

It was Europe for the Conservatives for much of the last twenty years, reform of public services and the Iraq war for the Blair government, and Europe again during the Thatcher years. Every governing party starts fighting amongst themselves eventually. And this government won’t be any different.

With looming job losses from Ed Miliband’s ideological crusade to make Britain the global leader on climate change it is already clear that a civil war within Labour is about to break out over net zero – and the battle will be a vicious one.

At a crunch meeting later this week, the car-makers will tell the Transport Secretary Louise Haigh and the Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds that thousands of jobs in the industry will soon be lost because of the unrealistic targets to sell Electric Vehicles.

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:47

"The funding was known on Friday last week"Was it??? By who?

[chilltime] 18/11/2024 18:43

Gazza

It is about the science as if it doesn't work it doesn't get to market.

Many are in for end game which it is all about the science, which so far is excellent.

[chilltime] 18/11/2024 18:40

Head and Neck 3 responders.!

Do we know how many are currently in that combo trial, it has passed Simon stage 1.

[chilltime] 18/11/2024 18:39

Share price rise and falls are simply demand based.

It had a run from last week some obviously cashed in on news back in August post Labour voted in an estate start selling shares having been 3 years dormant. It triggered Calculus clients to react too, CGT, IHT and so on.
The relevant family also sold shares in another company of a much higher value.

Upcoming near term are Glymab deal news, which will create more volume but unlikely to see the build beforehand as we knew an update was going Q4 re Scib1.

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:38

so you want me to bet when you know the outcome ?

so why the secrecy ?

and why if you are so chuffed that you could win ... you will send proof

but not of the size of your portfolio ....???

even thou you keep telling us you could buy a million shares

what was the trade size ?

[gazza] 18/11/2024 18:38

So to summarise the day:RNS issued with confirmation of great results in the SCIB1 trial.Super proactive interview with LD. Sounded relaxed and confident.Result? share price DOWN 5.5%Conclusive proof it's NOT all about the science.

[ivyspivey] 18/11/2024 18:35

OK Nana .
Do you want to bet £100 that I did not sell any SCLP shares today within 4 minutes of the bell.
.
If so am happy to take the bet and happily send proof..

[miavoce] 18/11/2024 18:34

I disagree 2tyke.

[inanaco] 18/11/2024 18:33

how strange ... The funding was known on Friday last week

so why did Burble not sell then

why did gazza not sell then

the word is lay claim to .... so that he can "pontificate" because he has nothing else to say

[2tyke] 18/11/2024 18:31

Miavoce, it's no use in stating that the share price 'should have risen strongly'.
That's your opinion and is pointless, especially as it's based on a total bogus premise. The fact is, and typically is, that the stock tends to fall on good external progress from the company. This is a common occurrence in the markets and the two are therefore obviously not related.
Neither is it useful to say that the market does not 'understand' the progress.
The market price of a stock is ALWAYS correct by definition.
It is clearly yourself that doesn't understand therefore....as I'm sure you now appreciate as your view has inane's support !

[ivyspivey] 18/11/2024 18:29

Mia it is a good post but to add it was obvious that due to a leaky ship that a number had bought in recent days and were always likely to sell on news unless stellar.Whilst there were good bits there was also the delays and funding issue highlighted by Burble.
People like Nan ramping the expectation level of the ORR which I warned again meant that the results were not as good as anticipated .Simple as.