Look inane...first and foremost if you don't think holding SCLP is very risky ....you have NO idea about markets and the actual risks involved.
You also need to stop thinking that Scancell holdings and SCLP are inter-changeable....they aren't. This explains why positive external company news does NOT translate to share price
To understand the market you would need to understand and recognise the points that traders actually buy and sell. You don't understand the significance of flurries of trades and what drives them.
You are merely a hindsight observer. One of the many who watch and state. ..'somethings going on'..lol
You are a pawn...tossed around in ignorance.
If this drops below 7.6p...you'll see what wave fodder you are. |
turkey what is there to understand with the stock market ?
your only control is buy or sell
its an auction going on all the time
with commissions paid
i have no idea what is in your head ... !! |
'if investors are smart..why don't they post like me ?'
Is that a rhetorical question ? Lol
.
.
'tykey thinks all SCLP holders are losers'
No ..you are the loser. And always will be because 1) you don't understand the stock market ( obvious from all your comments)
2) you have NO intellectual honesty.
.
.
No idea why you keep mentioning redmile and vulpes. They have already acted and don't control anything.
As the NASDAQ falls heavily their investments will crash. They will exit the weakest options. The ones with long times to market.
It seems calculus are ahead of the game. |
but the market is not buying Scancells technology ...
how can it .....
the value is Big Pharma
and you have just seen the value of targets Genmab .... they are doing all the work to get it to trial
you know now at that point the target becomes £10m approx untested
so in theory our other three are worth £30m untested
which makes Modi2 worth £40m ? modi1 is testing the theory
so just based on what you know ... that is £70m
without Modi1 and Scib1
how individual shareholders value that i have no idea ...
but common sense tells you scancell is cheap |
at least a sensible comment Dom
when scancell raise funds they give you a run ahead of what the funds are for
each stage has a time element .. an estimate
so you can wait for that Data to appear or sell without, the share price in between will be a variable
if you have set time limits by your own ideas of what might happen ... they probably don't match scancells time scales
other things come into play as well the economy, sentiment, taxation, competition
so we have these small time scales ... and bigger time scales
ORR is small time scales
PFS longer
OS a lot longer
indicators give us direction
so ORR gave us direction Scib1 and Modi1
now PFS is giving Direction
but we are still well within the "investment window" for the recent cash raises going back about 4 years
that is the full data sets
if you sell before don't expect the share price do do anything ... forget about it
because all the indicators are pointing to success
"synergy" with the competition ....
the ultimate business model ... |
Could someone tell him (in moment when he stops for breath) that estimaated values for years ahead are all very well, but you cannot sell them or in any other way realise them today. Ergo, the price is a 'penny share' until success is visible. |
now i have Not held 1.7m shares since 2012
something Ivy struggles with |
 i didn't say you had failed
what i said was you admit to your own failure
you can tell you have never had your own business ...
and you have no understanding at all about investments in research
Scancell has diluted because of discovery ... not failure
Duh !
again you put The £ first rather, than the assets being developed
so for you. your business if it was yours, would have ground to a halt ....
because you would consider further investment a failure
thus writing off £50,0000
always treat an investment as if it was your business and you will learn with it
sadly you didn't
""if you could financially keep up with the investment in scancell vs dilution then the posts would be of major interest to you"
No they wouldn't. So you invest £50k in Scancell. It drops (sometimes due to dilution) to £40k so you "top it up" to £50k by chucking another £10k. And so on. Who in their right mind would think that was a sensible strategy?""
Redmile
Vulpes
even Calculus had second dip
the issue for you in the business model was under capitalised to be able to fund the investment fully and if Risk was the issue you should never have invested in the first place ... that is mindless gambling
I had sufficient capital ...and the success occurred in 2015
in the future could i maintain that if Scancell went for a Reg trial via a cash call probably not ... but i do have sufficient head room with my holding
and we have a scenario that the market last year for Scib1 was $1.5b
now
iscib1 $3.8 billion
Adjuvant $9 billion
i suggest somebody is valuing the market for a partnership ...
because you are not reading it correctly .. you cannot evaluate it
even Immunobody being both a Therapeutic and Prophylactic at the same time is to much for you to handle |
"ruck ... my mind workssadly yours has failed you have admitted as such"The only failure I have admitted is my investment strategy in Scancell having held for 13 years, therefore stagnant money. As you have adopted exactly the same strategy yours has also failed. So you need to understand every time you point the failure finger at me (which you do often) you are only highlighted your own failed strategy. "if you could financially keep up with the investment in scancell vs dilution then the posts would be of major interest to you"No they wouldn't. So you invest £50k in Scancell. It drops (sometimes due to dilution) to £40k so you "top it up" to £50k by chucking another £10k. And so on. Who in their right mind would think that was a sensible strategy? That failure is on you alone. |
AND NOBODY LISTENS TO YOU DOM .......your brother is still in prison
and you are way to old to join front line demonstrations
or have any impact on Scancell, your own BB is empty |
What more can I say?
The man (?) cannot control himself..... |
Bermuda will tell you that Puritas was indeed a smart cookie |
so the question is .......
if posters are so smart ... why don't they post like i do ..
Puritas used to do it ....
he was more advanced than i was !! |
which is why i can say ..............
Oxford we are already there .....
😉 |
if you could understand it
the childish outbursts would stop and creative thinking about what i am actually posting would be possible
its an inherent problem
Bermudas Post prompted research by me into precancer
the result amazing if you understand it
Autophagy is happening before and after
in a good way ................. then a bad way
but nothing changes Scancell targets autophagy exactly the same way the immune system does in precancer
now if you have not understood that ... OMG |
ruck ... my mind works
sadly yours has failed you have admitted as such
if you could financially keep up with the investment in scancell vs dilution then the posts would be of major interest to you
but you place Risk well ahead of further investment
and what i am posting is all about the future of the underlying assets
if you cant follow that and as your outburst on vaccines prove you are unable to grasp even the basics
i cannot help you ...i could be talking absolute drivel like others do but you would accept that drivel as fact
why "incapability" to understand what i am actually posting
it goes right over your head ... |
wealth only becomes effective when its concentrated
you cannot redistribute wealth with out effect it dilutes its influence
this is what labour is doing .........
another example Ivy loss of wealth
after MTFB crashed ... he has had to become baby buffet
his trade last year made him £500 in scancell
that loss of wealth has made him ineffective
it could happen to me ... for sure
i would become ineffective if i lost that wealth ... but i do have the backup of income generating investments
unlike MTFB which collapsed so all gone
mine is NOT in £ its in shares which are trading
and this is why many lose money on the stock market
the £ sign sits in front of the asset so they concentrate on the share price not the underlying assets,
the reason why Turkey likes bitcoin, he is to thick to understand underlying assets
the actual tangible part
so i ask the question how can the tangible fail ?
well it can't hence
which one has failed
Keytruda or SCIB1
nobody can answer that question since 2015
thus the tangible asset has a value
its NOT written in to scancells accounts as a Value, but as a Loss which is what R and D is
but we have an idea of its sales value $9 billion per year
ATB |
Inan, Can I give you some genuine advice? Take a day off tomorrow, go for a walk in the country, breathe some fresh air and enjoy the atmosphere. Go down the pub with a mate and discuss the cricket, football or even the state of the economy. Seeing you implode so publicly is quite disturbing. |
lozan does exactly the same .......... no money so attack the investment |
so Turkey identifies everyone as a loser who holds scancell
why ?
because he has no money ... so his Ideology, bring every one down to his level
"stupid" |
on most websites including bitcoin ... CFD etc
you get a warning
70% of traders dabbling lose money on this site
so somebody selling today in the PI market is probably selling at a loss
the market has absorbed Scancells share issue, calculus sales ...
so it looks to find shares if they have a stable buyer ...
so look for the Loser .....smoke and mirrors |
smoke and mirrors |
plasbryn
a forced buyer more like ... MM wants shares |
All this scientific and political gibberish....absolutely irrelevant to his plummeting wealth
translated means "i don't understand it"
Same as Ivy ....
which is why he got caught out with Sub prime debt |
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
Hot Features
Premium
