FLC reported for personal attack |
Although I may be wrong again we might see an update to,
The page name might change.
that releases the full details of the communications between the UKPTO and QBT for this particular application sometime tomorrow given they update on a Wednesday.
Of course we already know how hard this is failing under the PCT via a standard exchange of communications published by that body. |
Markets are bent as, look at LSE who continue to let the new group of liars start posting, MM stooges, City Spivs, TW group of bashers I have seen posted many times.Don't fall for their BSNice 6 million buy today on OTC, looks like the Americans starting to buy in |
FLC*ucking*ying*untWhy are you here trolling 24/7 with all your multiple ID?How's drunk Tom doing? |
actually spreadex are still taking bets |
Just got a quiet afternoon mate and fighting the boredom but no one wants to play. I don't post on LSE..it's ramp central over there..lol. |
Someone has to have the sausage slipped in. |
In your case they have probably done it to stop you losing money they will not be able to recover. |
ask yourself why spreadex and IG have stopped taking bets...only do it to good shares |
His mate, flips burgers, is going to give him extra chips for free. Either that or Deliveroo just landed him with a Big Eat delivery. |
No there isn't. The spread, or lack of it would suggest otherwise. |
big order being filled...mates/partners rates,watch this space x |
Certainly does not smack of interest from an institutional investor. I am slightly surprised the the loonies over on LSE are not trying to ramp it as being interest from a bank like the last one but I suppose since Jambone and his other nyms have been banhammered that was less likely. |
To put that in to perspective...it's 1.2m quid..less than the price of a house on a Cheshire housing estate. |
RKBeekeeper appears to be trying to generate a ramp centered around American interest or perhaps a possible listing on an American market.
It looks like the idiot needs a bit of help,
THE BANK OF NEW YORK (NOMINEES) LIMITED 9.0%
Of course the entity is listed in the UK
but presumably that is so that they can accept investments into the UK on behalf of some Americans happy to take part in the forward selling of shares for a quick profit rather than doing so because they have any faith in the companies technology.
Again. Remember that the above entity was also instrumental in the October 2023 placing. It seems to have worked for them last time. It seems to have worked for them again. |
Pregnant with P Diddys kid |
This is positively pregnant with a whoosh.
Gla lth'ers! |
Well. I would not want to argue with an AI but if I am going to agree with it then that would imply that despite their claims QBT has no training data or at least none that came from previous solutions...
This tool, known as Method C AI Oracle (“AI Oracle”), is now performing live Bitcoin mining of current blockchain blocks, (i.e., around block count 879,000, after Method C has been “retrained” to deal with current blockchain blocks).
They have repeatedly made similar claims in respect of such training using historic data in the past but it looks like Gemini has exposed such claims as being fanciful if not a lie. |
 As suggested the inputs used to generate the hash output are transmitted back to the network
My understanding is that the full input is not stored and neither is the way the miner composed the input.
This from Gemini:
What's on the Blockchain
Block Header: This is the crucial piece of data that gets added to the blockchain. It contains:
Previous Block Hash: Links to the previous block in the chain.
Merkle Root: A hash of all the transactions included in the block.
Timestamp: When the block was mined.
Difficulty Target: The target hash value for mining.
Nonce: The value that miners adjusted to find the winning hash.
Transactions: The actual list of transactions included in the block is also stored.
What's Not Directly Viewable
The Miner's "Input": This is the raw data that the miner initially fed into the hashing algorithm. It's not stored directly. This input would include:
The block header template (with some initial values)
The Merkle root of the transactions
Potentially some miner-specific data
Why the Distinction Matters
Security: The fact that the full "input" isn't stored is a key part of Bitcoin's security. It prevents someone from easily reversing the hash function to potentially manipulate the blockchain.
Efficiency: Storing the entire input for every block would be very storage-intensive. The block header provides enough information to verify the block's validity. |
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
Hot Features
Premium
