Hot Features
Premium
No photos found.
The point of the NDA is so that QBT don't have to inform the market of their failure.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
This user has no comment yet.
| College | MSDCN |
No photos found.
The point of the NDA is so that QBT don't have to inform the market of their failure.
Clearly LTHs are distancing themselves from QBT. Firstly KoolKat claiming they were on a free ride and now the mentally ill 'baserite' claiming QBT
lol KoolKat claiming they are not emotional then storming off the LSE board in a hissy fit
If you're invested your opinion is compromised as you obviously want the price to go up and view all info and opinion through that lens. Hence why
Liking KoolKat15s reinvention of themselves as a master trader on a free carry. You can be anything you want to be on the internet. Previous claims
Interesting point raised by Hexam on LSE regarding the true improvement being 43% when discarding 30% of the inputs. I assume though that the
The hardware element of this almost seems irrelevant as what really matters is the data being fed from the Oracle. The main focus of any testing
The NDA purely exists to cover QBT in the event that their Methods don't do what they claim they do. There is no good reason why they need to hide
Assuming baserite on LSE is Indian/Pakistani heritage. Goes on and on about Aunties and Uncles as if it is a normal part of everyday British culture.
lol down it goes. Between this and CPAI Jamerson5 aka Jambone is having a great day haha
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
