Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc | LSE:QBT | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B50P5B53 | ORD 0.25P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.725 | 4,131,803 | 08:00:19 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.725 | 0.725 | 0.725 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offices-holdng Companies,nec | EUR | EUR -4.21M | EUR -0.0033 | -2.18 | 9.36M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:41:17 | O | 363 | 0.70 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/3/2025 | 07:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Business Update |
| 24/1/2025 | 09:21 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Rollover of REPO |
| 23/1/2025 | 14:30 | ALNC |  IN BRIEF: Quantum Blockchain stock falls after GBP2 million placing |
| 23/1/2025 | 07:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Placing |
| 17/1/2025 | 11:27 | ALNC | IN BRIEF: Quantum Blockchain shares skyrocket on AI "breakthrough" |
| 17/1/2025 | 07:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Bitcoin Mining - Method C Update |
| 15/1/2025 | 14:46 | ALNC | Quantum Blockchain files UK patent application for AI Oracle |
| 15/1/2025 | 07:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - AI Oracle Patent Application |
| 11/12/2024 | 07:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Amendment and Grant of Share Options |
| 24/10/2024 | 06:00 | UKREG | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc - Method C Update |
Quantum Blockchain Techn... (QBT) Share Charts1 Year Quantum Blockchain Techn... Chart |
|
1 Month Quantum Blockchain Techn... Chart |
Intraday Quantum Blockchain Techn... Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/3/2025 | 15:19 | Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc | 15,995 |
| 27/3/2025 | 11:12 | Quantum Blockchain Technologies - Worlds Fastest Bitcoin Mining Tech | 14,276 |
| 19/1/2025 | 21:03 | Goldman Sachs to buy Quantum blockchain tech.? looking at crypto firms | 46 |
| 26/6/2024 | 15:28 | Quantum Blockchain - AI NEW THREAD | 3,305 |
| 11/3/2024 | 14:42 | QBT - Green Powered Quantum Blockchain Technologies | 18,776 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:41:18 | 0.70 | 363 | 2.54 | O |
| 14:16:12 | 0.75 | 65,444 | 490.50 | O |
| 13:32:38 | 0.74 | 132,733 | 987.53 | O |
| 13:30:27 | 0.75 | 66 | 0.50 | O |
| 13:03:45 | 0.75 | 1,333 | 10.00 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 28/3/2025 08:20 by Quantum Blockchain Techn... Daily Update Quantum Blockchain Technologies Plc is listed in the Offices-holdng Companies,nec sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker QBT. The last closing price for Quantum Blockchain Techn... was 0.73p.Quantum Blockchain Techn... currently has 1,291,313,755 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Quantum Blockchain Techn... is £9,297,459. Quantum Blockchain Techn... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -2.18. This morning QBT shares opened at 0.73p |
Posted at 26/3/2025 12:05 by darmz All I see across aim Is Price hikes when market makers and brokers are offloading and forward selling placings they then short the stock Placing is announced and share price drops below placing QBT has nothing no PR no news It went to 2.3p last time so placing could be done As soon as it was the share price has been falling ever since I do not see any news or anything imminent that will even take this o placing price |
Posted at 20/3/2025 20:34 by ellipses Another spot from UserSteve over on LSE...In a previous diatribe by my good self I suggested that D-Waves Quantum Annealing Computer would not be suitable for the mining of BitCoin. I might have to admit that I am wrong. However, on a quick read through, this application appears to be specific to Blockchain and in particular its validation rather than the mining of Bitcoin. On one side of the coin the presence of such a technique should not trash the share price of QBT, that should be self trashing itself if it were not for numpty know nothing investors but given there are numpty know nothing investors involved it seems possible that this will happen. On the other side of the coin. Numpty know nothing investors in D-Wave should not expect a lift off in the share price of D-Wave but given there are numpty know nothing investors involved it seems possible that this will happen. |
Posted at 20/3/2025 19:55 by 1knocker FG 'presenting individually to customers on a one-to-one basis in a private setting' it does sound rather like a lap dancer taking customers for a bit extra in a back room.The difference, of course is that the lap dancer has something to sell. That will be why Vlad, QBT's 'international sales consultant' is not being taken along. I get the feeling that FG is, literally and figuratively, just going through the motions, IF QBT was an oil explorer it would have written off the current quest as a dry well. Time to dismantle the rig and move on. So what should be next? It has tried and failed with swimming pools , pizzas, and quantum computing. Drones seem quite fashionable at present. I see that the share price slipped again today. QBT is now down 75% from its brief post-placement spike few weeks ago. The sands are running out. |
Posted at 13/3/2025 19:58 by ellipses There seems to be some excitement over on LSE regarding a 'breakthrough' by D-Wave...Indeed QBT have had some exposure to the company in the past... Notice that D-Wave were then and are now offering access to Quantum Annealing technologies. You might suppose that the nature of this becomes a bit suspect when the company mentions 5,000+ qubit implementations. Google’s latest iteration of its quantum machine, the Sycamore quantum processor, currently holds 70 qubits. This is a substantial leap from the 53 qubits of its earlier version. This makes the new processor approximately 241 million times more robust than the previous model. How can D-Wave claim 5,000 qubits when poor old Google is still stuggling along at 70? This is because D-Wave qubits are totally different to Google qubits. You might characterise Google qubits as being multi-state and amenable to general purpose calculations whereas D-Wave qubits are lowest-state and amenable to single purpose calculations. Indeed the release from D-Wave suggests a materials science application in magnetics where the process of annealing would be expected to make predictions as to how such materials might crystalise. This has absolutely nothing to do with the task that QBT have set for themselves and indeed the suggestion made over on LSE that it will accelerate their development of such ideas is entirely misplaced. This of course will beg the question as to why did QBT make such a song and dance about their involvement with D-Wave in the past and your simple answer is that QBT were once again misleading their investors. Quantum Annealing Computer ≠ Quantum Computer but it's close enough to fool the ignorant investor, as it has done over on LSE and drive the share price. Your other nicer but equally unappealing answer is that QBT set up a paid for jolly for someone to make use of D-Waves technology for research totally unrelated to their stated goals. |
Posted at 11/3/2025 10:53 by 1knocker PS The interview is informative in one respect. We now know what the 'valuable strategic advice' Rios has given was:Rios: 'Your problem is that within the industry QBT is perceived as a scam, and your claims as fake news, and the FT says it has no assets' FG: 'Oh dear. What do we do about that?' Rios: 'Employ me to attend events in exotic locations, as QBT's front man, and to introduce you to people. Everyone recognises me. It is the sombrero and the 'tache, I think. Everyone laughs and smiles when they see me' FG: 'I could also make another video' Rios: ' Haven't you already tied that, many times?' FG: 'Yes, but this time I will make it i 3D. That will make all the difference. No one will suspect that something presented in 3D is fake news. And I could include the girl in the sash. The one who handed out chocolates and QBT stickers in Tennessee. She has big assets. That will impress the FT' Rios: 'The one with the long legs and big boobies? FG: Yes. She was very popular and gave QBT great credibility. And she will look good in 3D. She prompted a lot of comments about assets. No one who saw her thought QBT was a scam, with no assets. But the FT journalist was not at Tennessee, so he did not see her' Rios: 'Its worth a try, I suppose. But first book my first class flights and top hotel accommodation at some industry jamborees. Don't forget - First class and 4 Star - that is essential because I have a 'perception' problem, a credibility problem, to overcome too after getting the push from Intel' FG: 'Will do. But not 4 Star. 5 Star. I'll come myself as well of course, as we shall be pushing the boat out and QBT will be paying' |
Posted at 11/3/2025 10:29 by 1knocker The transcript contains a lot of 'same old, same old'.Another 'hopefully by the y/e' (a Block release QBT depends upon) Yet more 'everyone is very interested' and another 'we know all the main players and are talking to them'. But also some unusual notes of realism: !. an acknowledgements that QBT has a credibility problem and is prone to be dismissed by serious players in the sector as a sam and its claims as fake news. 2. Also an assertion that the CEO's of miners do not know how crypto mining works and don't understand QBT's technology. 3. Also that FG and his team are unknown faces to the significant players in the sector, so they need to attend events to meet industry people and obtain recognition, and rely on Rios because (though given the heave ho by Intel) he did at least spend years trying to flog a now discontinued chip to them. I am not sure how you square 'everyone is very interested' with the miner CEO's allegedly not even understanding how their own mining tech works, or indeed how FG and QBT can have been talking to all the main sector players for years but are still unknown faces to them. I do understand how QBT may be regarded as a scam and its claims 'fake news', though I am surprised that FG is prepared to admit that. Quite how signing up Rios as a consultant - an ex-employee of Intel who who used to try to flog a now discontinued chip and was declared 'not wanted on voyage' by Intel when it pulled manufacture of that chip - solves the perception that QBT is a scam and that its technological breakthrough claims are fake news is a mystery to me. Logically, the sight of Rios as a QBT consultant might be expected to reinforce that perception. If FG exhibits the same habit of crossing wires and advancing contradictory propositions simultaneously in his mathematical and tech analysis as he does in his promotional interviews, it is just as well for him that he is employer as well as employee when pitching for QBT consultancies at eye watering fees. It does help if you are conducting both sides of the negotiation. No risk of any awkward perceptions about =scams and fake news undermining confidence, and full facial recognition on both sides of course, without even the need for an introduction from some gent is a sombrero. |
Posted at 10/3/2025 09:20 by ellipses I wonder at what point even the most die hard ramper will concede they have been misled.Well. It looks like Jambone has thrown in the towel and managed to prove that what is discussed on these forums has no effect on the Share Price. At least not the low quality ranting rubbish they managed to produce. Otherwise it is strange how QBT manages to continually suppress the good news. Anyone might conclude that it is actually bad news. Of course QBT remains and has always been a no news company. |
Posted at 08/3/2025 19:06 by 1knocker If an 8.5m transaction ws in fact a purchase and not a sale, QBT holders should be very worried indeed.A substantial sale will inevitably depresses the share price - it knocks confidence and thus demand at the same time as it increases supply of shares. The converse is true in the case of a substantial purchase. When even an 8.5m purchase does not stop the price slide, things really are dire. The best that can be said is that while 8,5m is a substantial number of QBT shares, such a purchase does not amount to much in money, and it is the money spent on a purchase which, if significant, bolsters market confidence. If there is any telling statistic it is the absence of insider purchases. There seems to be no price so low that insiders consider QBT shares investible. They ought to know, and they are not buying (even at a fraction of the recent placement price) notwithstanding that QBT now has money for at least another year of cash burn, it is supposedly soon to market a viable product, and the Sipiem judgment debt is supposedly recoverable, with ever increasing additional sums in interest and inflation adjustments. That is something which should give even the most optimistic holder and every prospective purchaser pause for thought. |
Posted at 03/3/2025 13:15 by ellipses I'd still like to know why they failed to get Method B to work on the BMZ2 ASIC when it is likely to be the case that this was the ASIC they were cooperating on with Intel to get the hardware modifications proposed in their two, failing, patent applications incorporated in the chip.It really makes no sense them talking to Intel about this unless Intel gave the information about the architecture and communications interface on the ASICs and if they had that information it should have given them an easy route through to implementing Method B on those ASICs. Unfortunately now FG appears to admit as much in his most recent Proactive Handjob video QBT seem to have worked with a third party, presumably not Intel, to do this and this third party would not release this information to them without doing an exclusive deal. QBT did not agree and, once again, ended up in the same repeated dead end. Unless I have missed something it might seem reasonable to conclude that the supposed cooperation with Intel did not happen or did not happen in any real depth or to the extent that FG wants people to believe. It seems to be another example of the blokes fairy tales being full of holes. Furthermore I find it quite surprising that given they have Rios on board that they are talking about gaining access to these ASICs via the work done by OSMU rather that Rios stepping in and both procuring the parts for them, it appears he was part of brokering the release of the ASICs from Block to OSMU, and also showing them how to hook Method B up to them. After all we are led to believe that Rios was deeply involved in the development of these ASICs so he should be the go to source for such information. If that is not the case then whilst Rios might be an organizer and facilitator for such things I might have to go back to my previous characterization of the man being a glorified sales rep. The fact that even with Rios acting as their Strategic Advisor QBT have not managed to get their hands on these ASICs and are still left relying on the OSMU, with which Rios is heavily involved, to come up with the firmware required to operate Method B against them really does not add up. Also given they had to roll their own FPGA including the SHA256 lanes in order to arrive at a demonstration of Method C after all of the hoo-haa about ESP-Miner and the BitAXE being their saviour seems to be a prime indicator that they could not work out how to use ESP-Miner and the BitAXE to demonstrate anything. Given this continual fail are things going to be any different once OSMU and @Skot have got the BMZ2 chips on a board along with the firmware? It does not seem very likely. After all on the Core Scientific video the person from block said these things were hard even if you do have all of the information and described third parties such as QBT being a Burden as in not worth bothering with. All we have really had as an excuse for QBT repeatedly going nowhere is that FG's AI numpty Megabranes don't have the skill set to go anywhere. It's been like that for at least a year if not longer. FG is continually blabbing on about his links to all of the best Universities in the world and all of the Megabranes he has on tap so don't these Universities have Electronics Faculties and are all of these Megabranes of the wrong flavour with no mates to ask? Won't anyone lend him a logic analyser? Pathetic. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 21:20 by ellipses OoooopsGood job the QBT share price is not dependent on the Bitcoin price. Quite a smart move by the company not to mine anything. Ay? |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
