The Broomtard isn't regulated to give financial advice - his recommendation is now 50% downAnyone that lost money buying on the Broomtard's advice should sue him for their losses |
When the share price was 2.05 the Broomtard posted ,,,Broomrigg - 21 Jan 2025 - 08:01:39 - 14107 of 14114Opening up......KEEP ADDING QBT |
What Broomtard doesn?t want you to read_____Broomrigg - 08 Nov 2021 - 11:01:29 - 7420 of 18777QBT 100 bagger potential here within the next few Months |
When this drops under 1p we are gonna PAAAAARTY like it's 1999PAAAAARTY time laughing at the ramper gimps - it's soooooo much fun |
No deals news soon and this will drop fast to 0.8p |
Patting yourself on the back now mr bellend just when you thought this board couldn't get any more weirder.. FML |
Assuming QBT and their prospective partner might wish to pretend to be fabless, I don't think FG has buzzedworded that one yet, they would still have to convince a foundry to take on production. I wonder how an SaaS might fit into that proposition? |
As the Oracle requires retraining on current blocks it makes sense for the newly trained Oracle to be transmitted via a SaaS.
No indication though as to how often it needs to be retrained, or how often a rig using the Oracle needs to talk to the SaaS.
Of course, any chip manufacturer that agrees to build the chip has to accept that the chips performance will be reliant on QBT providing updates to the Oracle. |
Everyone reported for hurtful posting. 1knocker - filtered!
Irrefutability continues. RKB on fire! |
Method C has been designed as a SaaS (Software as a Service) client-server application. The QBT server, where the Method C engine runs, updates the key parameters on the client side of the AI model.
Given the real time requirements for Method C AI Oracle, to process in advance each single input to a double SHA-256 lane on the ASIC chip, its hardware implementation on the same chip is necessary, hence ASIC chips for bitcoin mining manufacturers will need to get access to QBT’s IPs for the AI Oracle and integrate them on their ASIC existing chip architectures. |
Can you show me where it says an SAaS is needed to update the Oracle? |
For something that is irrefutable they seem pretty keen to hide it away and prevent any scrutiny |
cost going forwards on method C apart from in-house software development for mathod C to be used on ming pools
They still need a SaaS which PG suggested was going to over £1m to set up. A SaaS is required to update the Oracle.
You and the failed DJ throw around a lot of accusations of lying and 'deformation' but never give any examples. Funny that. Not as funny as your LSE ban though. That must make you furious. |
You appear to be following mikey_dj to this board from LSE Jamerson5, - he doesn't like that as he says it is is stalking and will get his lawyers to send you a letter |
Mikey, in regards to Hexam and the other weirdos post on LSE.QBT's last raise of 2 million lasted 16 months so those posts that say more money is needed are false and misleading.QBT are going to licence the tech to the ASIC chip manufacturers so there is no cost going forwards on method C apart from in-house software development for mathod C to be used on ming pools.Give the reasons why it's false Mikey then it also helps make the trolls look like the liars they are.I would but my account has been removed by the bent LSE. |
At least someone is making some fat wedge
______
mr bernard castle - 17 Jan 2025 - 08:47:29 - 11528 of 11695
Short at 2.05
It?s just free cash |
Next stop going sub 1pall aboard the losers express DING DING |
How is your database going mikey_dj? What is this network you speak of?? |
Hey go easy on the Hot Tub it has a bubbly personality |
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
Hot Features
Premium
