Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[elrico] 29/6/2017 10:13

Why should it be secrete? Is it not reasonable to know the operational time, waste efficiency watt generated from waste and material used in the test. This is not commercially sensitive. It is about feeding investors and potential investors information so they are better informed to make important decisions.

[warwick69] 29/6/2017 09:48

Why should company secret data be on the website???

[elrico] 29/6/2017 09:20

Superg - You see there is part of the problem. The Brisbane data should be on the company website for all to digest. You have thought it would have been available for Aprils UKI show or the planned investor presentation, but its not. I can only conclude the company is not confident enough for the data to stand up to scrutiny. That is a concern for me. I am not invested, I once was at the heady heights of 3p before bailing.

[superg1] 29/6/2017 08:28

I have asked the questions but he replied but no written reply to the questions yet, so hopefully he will detail the Brisbane run time for me to share here.

[warwick69] 29/6/2017 07:33

If you ask Keith he will confirm the plant was run continuously in Brisbane and worked fine

[superg1] 29/6/2017 07:29

Perhaps people at the investor event will cover those type of questions.

For me looking on I agree on the tech point. If it works then detail how long the test run was.

If the tests were purely to test individual parts withoit continuous run time then a continuous test is needed imo.

I understand why invetors would be reluctant when there is no detail to show material continuous run times without failure.

If that type of test had been carried out then imo it's important to state that clearly. However for many that would be step one. Then they would need to demonstrate the modular 25 tpd unit can do the same without repeated failure.

They could get a backer to JV and fund the 25 tonne units for such tests but on the pure customer side until it's fully independently tested who would buy the units.

Obviously that doesn't stop material progress re partners as the original tests declared may lead to JVs or the like.

I imagine recent placements will amount to detail of independent testing once they have been run for a while.

[warwick69] 29/6/2017 07:19

Erico and scrutable that's why when it's proven to gobble up the feedstocks and produce loads of electric and or syngas/Hydrogen at the demonstration it will fly as all you risk averse investors and new investors will want to pile in for moreI understand your concerns I have taken a big gamble on trust that it will do what they have promised and will be very well rewarded if it works as promised Every one has their own thresholds for risk

[elrico] 29/6/2017 00:16

SCRUTABLE - Dear friend, the share price is artificially low, it is where it is because PHE has a history of over promising and not delivering. I have previously found KA very approachable and free to offer non price sensitive info when asked. However, I have also learned technical data which PI's need to make informed decisions has been lacking. There is not enough data for PI to digest and gain real encouragement for the future.

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 16:40

So no stock available under .90 so not a bad day as bid is actually above .85 despite ridiculous wide spread by MM who are clearly trying to slow this rally

[bronislav] 28/6/2017 12:59

Warwick.I agree wholeheartedly with you about the market being bent.Nobody will do anything about it so its pointless concerning oneself about it..The trick must surely be to learn the rules of the game and trade accordingly.Intraday means nothing ,if powerhouse has what it says it has then it will find its true value eventually.

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 10:54

MM doing it again no shares available at .90 why is this happening

[superg1] 28/6/2017 10:09

Scrutable

On the tests I believe the feedstock was stated as plastics and tyre crumb.

Looking at the mention of stress tests and other bits I'd guess plastics and tyre crumb were used for their high calorific value which is a factor on performance but is probably a good feedstock to use in tests to get to high temperatures to see if it all held together. It seems that was a success
.

The detail that is lacking Imo is how long those tests were run for.

As stated the presentation gives returns based on running 22 hours per day 365, so I would expect any test to be called a successful test to have run at 22 hours per day for extended periods, perhaps weeks and months.

Imo that's the sort of data a potential customer would want to see before committing with independent tests.

Then the proof for a 25 tonne unit which it seems will be the modular size. If that works without failure then surely it's a a very interesting technology.

But there is nothing in the detail I can see that answers the questions I raise. But then I am type that wants to know it inside out.

For now all I'd like to know is how many hours it ran for in the tests and how long was it continually ran for. If possible how much feedstock was used in the entire test period.

I don't take those questions to be intrusive or subject to restriction as the test was done on a 1-3 bpd unit with a presentation suggesting such units can run 22 hours per day.

I don't want to know how it works just that the tests fit what they would be used for.

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 09:57

Nelson why the need to hide if you have so much truth to spout Why hide why not be open and explain why you have this beef WHO ARE YOU..??

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 09:15

Do your own dirty work !!! Oh no then you would have to come out of hiding you big yellow troll CHICKEN You are below contempt

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 09:13

Yes I am Wazzza I'm not hiding you twit

[nelson5100] 28/6/2017 09:06

reporting errors

[nelson5100] 28/6/2017 09:05

Or should I call you Wazzza as you post on LSE?

Well my postings caused the company to withdraw its error ridden 2015 audited accounts and had to issue amended accounts.

I have highlighted numerous financial reporting errors, if the company hasn't bothered to correct them then I can continue to highlight them to other users of this board.

Very simple question for you, what price were the 90,932,961 shares issued to Renewme priced at? The 2016 audited accounts would imply they were issued at 0.5p each yet the first filed share allotment form has them issued at 0.65p and also the amended form issued in May 2017 also has them at 0.65p.

Now if a company cannot even issue the most basic of share allotment forms then shouldn't this be highlighted? Again, the company was weeks late filing the director's appointment form for David Ryan, and was only issued after numerous prompts posted by me. Again what sort of company cannot file a simple director's appointment form on time?

Not forgetting this company has an experienced Company Secretary, a chartered accountant as a director and now has a Chief Financial Officer, non board appointment, who is also a chartered accountant.

So why don't you as a significant shareholder ask the company to correct its reporting errirs? Or are you only interested in ramping a share price?

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 09:04

Exactly just as I rang the LSE who allow these cheats to ply their trade

[stuj1970] 28/6/2017 09:01

And just marked back up, good call Warwick.....?

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 08:59

MM You are complete cheats and manipulating scum bags

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 08:55

MM playing games again it's .9299 to buy just £100 of shares so where is there any shares on offer at 0.90 must be the smallest offer ever just to make price look lower And who says they don't cheat

[warwick69] 28/6/2017 08:47

Nelson5100 or should we call you Dolphin5 from LSE the poster who posted the post you are now repeating!!As we have all asked you on LSE ASK THE COMPANY IF YOU HAVE A CONCERN OR GO TO THE AUTHORITIES we don't listen because you repeat the same thing over and over and over but don't want an answer You have an agenda !!! Which is clear opposite to the shareholders and owners of the business You are hiding behind hidden avatars you are a troll I have offered to discuss these issues with you as have other posters via your own email or by telephone or a meeting in a pub but you want to remain anonymous