Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[pro_s2009] 03/4/2023 11:12

Do you not see that they are one and the same ?

The statement ......... about 10 minus 6 = 4 is correct and unrelated to PANR.


However.....one can also apply the 10 minus 6 = 4 scenario to PANR if you take their circa 10m cash level at 30th of March and minus the 6m payables from 31st Dec you do indeed get a similar situation.

It can be a statement unrelated to PANR which also in fact seems to fit PANR if you assume the 6m payables is still due to be paid.

Its not rocket science........ however, if you see some more straws....have a good old clutch at them.......

[olderwiser2] 03/4/2023 10:55

Pro 32497

Pro, here it is in ELI5 just for you

This question was asked in post 32452
I am intrigued, where did you pluck the 6 million figure from

Pro answered in post 32457 (This is the lie)

(6m ? I posted a simple statement that if you had 10m cash and 6m payables you have free cash of 4m - its unrelated to PANR)

Pro post 32414 (My capitals shouting for pro, who is hard in denial)

Notice THEY dont talk about unrestricted cash..........just "cash".

Of course.........you have to pay your bills......and "PAYABLES" LOOKS to be about 6 million.

So if you take cash of 10m and then deduct payables of 6m it leaves what, 4m of free cash...... unrestricted ?

Thats my take on a QUICK GLANCE AT THE ITNERIMS, but perhaps I am wrong ??!!

Did they not need 5m to do Alkaid SMD test.......Mmmmmmmmmmm

Can see why THEY must do something before end of June aka in the 1st half of 2023.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Now to sum it up for you, you have specifically used PANR interim figures to calculate that 10m – 6m payables gives 4m, and then denied it is related to PANR, whilst also referring to they, in a post about PANR.

That there is a lie, plain and simple

(Let alone the misdirect that payables would be in the order of 6m)

[chris0805] 03/4/2023 10:12

Another loony poster... If PANR had executed hickory 1 rather than 88E, they would have been slated for starting late in the season and not testing until another 12 months have passed... 88E success?? the RNS reads similar to the Merlin *results* of ~ 2 years ago... it's clear what happened there is it not?

[chris0805] 03/4/2023 09:53

Certainly not hateful or bullying of Pro. Just exposing lies & BS spread by Pro cleverly interlaced with a few truths to make Pro posts seem plausible.. It's easy to be fooled by Pro_S2009 if you are uninitiated in Pro_S2009s devious ways.... Trust posts by Pro_S2009 at your financial peril. Applies across all threads on all BB on which Pro_S2009 posts. If you believe that posters here are bullying.... then go and read all of Pro_S2009 posts... (if you have lots of time to spare clearly!)

[forwood] 03/4/2023 09:09

You deserve everything you get, Sandcrab Pro sock puppet. Why persist with this charade? It's so obvious!

[sandcrab2] 03/4/2023 08:58

Lot of hateful bullying of Pro on this thread
Good to see 88e up 33% overnight on the ASX
Scott weighing in on LSE 88e at 3am upset a lot of people

[chris0805] 03/4/2023 08:37

No doubt more lies & BS from the BS Meister Pro_2009. It's really quite therapeutic not reading your BS as you are filtered due to blocking me on all of your self important, self centred threads. I have been tempted to unblock you, having seen recent engagement of your BS by several very highly respected posters on this thread, (Rabito in particular), but really, why would I waste my time reading your lies & self centred tutt?

[luckyswimmer3] 03/4/2023 08:35

Dodge, great results at 88e but the derampers here are too busy distracting people and the rampers can't bear that their kid brother is having more success over the fence with a mere vertical well than they had with a sidetrack that unfortunately got tangled up with a gas cap.

[pro_s2009] 03/4/2023 08:21

So identifiable and specific, you cannot even say what it is despite repeated asking..........yes.......very good

🤣🤣🤣🤣9315;

[talais] 03/4/2023 07:52

Exceptional

[dodge meister] 03/4/2023 07:42

Any comments on 88e results?

[olderwiser2] 03/4/2023 07:13

Pro
As a rule buried in most of your work, there is a devious bend of the truth, this one was very specific and identifiable as a direct lie though.

No amount of smoke or bluster can hide it

[pro_s2009] 03/4/2023 05:27

I ask again....where is the lie ?

[olderwiser2] 03/4/2023 05:04

Pro nothing has changed, you lied , you got caught, its in black and white, smoke will not change it

I know it is not your plan to prove your self a liar, as your devious misdirection's then lose effect, but hey you have now committed the cardinal sin, you have exposed yourself as the dishonest manipulator you are.

[pro_s2009] 03/4/2023 02:44

Nope... I have posted the link to the statement and detailed the figures.....

Please state which figures are wrong based on the interim statement.....

Squirm as you might... But you know you are wrong..

So I ask again

Did the company not have circa 16m cash at 31st Dec as per the Interims ?

Did the company also not have circa 6m payables due at 31st Dec as per the Interims ?

Does this not equate to "10m free cash at 31st Dec plus any receivables due" ?


Does/did the company not have circa 10m cash at 30th March as per the interims ?

What is the level of payables at 30th March ? Unknown ? So what do you assume ? I am assuming the level is still around the 6m mark. You are free to assume whatever you want.

[olderwiser2] 03/4/2023 02:22

Pro
There is nothing to discuss, you have been caught in a bare faced lie

As to the missing time unit, common sense fills it in for you, there are 125 units of time on the graph

Its not seconds or minutes, they could not flow 800 barrels in 125 seconds or minutes

The next unit is hours, yes this fits with the testing timeline

Next comes days, no they were not onsite for 125 days

Your objective is to construct doubt where there is none, fails again because there is no logic to it

I understand it is your mission to create false narratives, then use these to create fear and anxiety to further your trading strategy

At this point you are well enough know for it to be futile, but carry on under as many names as you choose, the burden of Karma and public ridicule is your own to carry forward

[olderwiser2] 02/4/2023 18:14

Pro you have been caught in a direct and manipulative lie, no amount of smoke will make it go away.

The proof is in black and white.

Be honest for once in your life, confess it is good for the soul

[pro_s2009] 02/4/2023 17:43

OlderbutperhapsnotWiser..... Your retort should have been that you assume that the 6m has been paid and receivables collected so that free cash is 10.8m on 30th March with no receivables or payables outstanding.

That should have been the bull case echo chamber pleading.

We could then agree to disagree with each others assumptions.

Too much emotion........