Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 16:05

You won’t know if I have a copy of the posts badgateway…230;…………

What I will say though is that MOST people on here are savvy enough to work out when something is made up. There’s been lots of content of that ilk written on here recently.

Problem is, when things are made up, more often than not you get caught out, don’t you?

All the best

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 16:01

It actually looks like you're a liar pos. Do have a link for any of these posts or were you just hoping no one would notice if you just made stuff up?

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:56

Does it not look good for me badgateway?

Sorry, I’m going to have leave now as I have to prepare a presentation on……R30;……#deleted so as to not get caught#

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:52

That’s a more reasoned and balanced logic hpcg. Rebuts the “simply right or wrong” perspective doesn’t it!

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 15:51

Going to have to call you out as a liar pos until you come up these posts, content deleted or not, when panr was 7p to 30p.
Will apologize if you come up with the posts but so far it doesn't look good for you.

[hpcg] 11/1/2023 15:48

Pos - oil explorers and drug developers have binary events with wildly different outcomes. The only way to sensibly price is to risk adjust. The trouble with the risk adjusted price is it is almost always wrong once the binary outcome is known. Pantheon's share price during drilling probably went over the top of fair value. Everything went smoothly from the spud to the end of the horizontal and the share price reacted to those events. Interestingly there was significant selling as the stimulation was under way, a long way shy of testing.

The binary event that didn't happen was oil flowing. Had the well started producing at 2000 barrels per day of sweet light then the risk adjusted share price at the time would have been far too low. Had it started flowing 1000 then again that news would probably have been bought. What actually happened are results well below the risk adjusted value at the time, and the market made a step change to a new level. The new level puts a much lower rating on the chance of success based on the evidence collected so far.

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 15:48

No pos its not like swindle1 and his deleted posts I mean there aren't any posts at all and his name doesn't come up in any one elses posts at the time either-ie no one is responding to him.
Are you trying to play me and the rest of the board?

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:48

Great spot Forwood, wish I’d have known that before posting what I did hey 😉.

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:45

Badgateway - if you can’t find any of Jak’s old posts, how do you know when he had a view on PANR, and what the price was at the time?

As such, how can you “jump in” and speak for him?

[forwood] 11/1/2023 15:45

Bit hard to search his past posts given he deletes them all! Must be somewhat nervous of his past coming back to haunt him or worse and from what I've observed over the past few weeks, justifiably so. Referrring to PANR directors as 'lying shysters' is probably libellous, not that they could be bothered to sue an obvious keyboard warrior on advfn.

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:37

When you say you “can’t find any”, do you mean there are no posts on live view, or all the posts have subsequently been deleted by JakNife? Maybe you’ve been played?

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 15:30

I searched for jaks posts through all the threads pos and can't find any for the time period you mention?
Are you sure on your facts if so would appreciate being guided to the correct thread.

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:13

…….badgateway - when did JakNife take a position? When did he learn about PANR? Did he choose to take a position as soon as he did PANR research or was he aware of it a long time ago?

Searching previous posts (I’m sure you know how to do that) shows that Jak had a negative view on Panr at 30p levels - he may not have held a position but he held a view. When the share price went up he didn’t disclose he’d changed his view and that the BOD were honest and there were commercial reservoirs. He therefore “simply got it wrong” for that period (using the share price and uncommercial reservoirs correlation logic).

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 15:02

Lol JakNife - it’s a pity you aren’t around to continue to debate. That said, thanks for at least confirming bad gateway’s lack of a reasoned argument and also confirming that you too jump to conclusions in the statements you make about me! I guess at least you accept that if an(y?) PANR RNS is released and the share price goes up you will have “simply got it wrong”.

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 14:55

Yes it is wrong pos.
You told jak he's been wrong longer than he's been right simply because at one point in time the share price was ramped from 7p to 30p and onto 150p without taking into acct the full picture, ie the one displayed in the chart above which shows that in practice its been quite the opposite.
The correct way to play this one has always been ride the spike, short the doubletop.

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 14:45

What I’ve written isn’t “not true at all” at all!

It is patently correct. If you disagree, you are misreading or misinterpreting what I have written.

You have made the mistake in your message of making untrue/inaccurate statements, so you are either very loose with language (I’m sure JakNife will call you out on that), or are trying to mislead.

You wrote “……;.whereupon all the pi's lose all their hard earned”. JakNife will pick it apart for you.

Nice try badgateway but you too have made the mistake of conflating share price performance with the thesis for the short - a schoolboy error.

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 14:28

If I may jump in thats not true at all pos. What the shareprice or rather chart says is that this one's an under performer that every now and again gets ramped to high heaven whereupon all the pi's lose all their hard earned.
Its a spike machine and the uninitiated in the ways of the market are its victims.


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com

[probabilityofsuccess] 11/1/2023 14:21

JakNife - given your thesis is based on a lying BoD and uncommercial reservoirs, when the share price went up from 7p or 30p to 150p do you accept you “simply got it wrong” or are you conflating share price performance and validation of your argument. The only way people will have “got it wrong” (if they are arguing the commerciality of the play) is when PANR ceases to look to develop and monetise the Alaskan prospects. We will both exit when that happens, the only question is, will that exit be through a JV/buyout or simply a whimper with no deal.

The prevailing share price is just the manifestation of sentiment, not the proof of an argument. If you disagree, then you have “simply got it wrong” longer than you have “got it right”.

[bad gateway] 11/1/2023 14:03

"I fully appreciate that those foot soldiers for the truth" lol

Up or down for the shareprice this thread never fails to entertain.

[soggy] 11/1/2023 13:31

I stand in awe of those who have consistently and persistently refuted the misleading or downright false statements by that small band of determined shorters/sceptics, whose behaviour in cussedly refusing to accept or engage with or even hear those refutations confirms that they are nothing but trolls, possibly paid, possibly just afflicted by that sad quirk of mental illness or social exclusion that leads people to act that way.I fully appreciate that those foot soldiers for the truth, and usually the positive case, do it to ensure any newbies finding this thread aren't hoodwinked by the forceful presentation of the negative, and often the disingenuous negative, case. But for so long now I haven't read a single word on here that has been news or intelligent, reasonable discussion - just this dialogue of the deaf.PANR bulls who keep manning the barricades, I salute you!But it's doing my nut in! I think I need to untick Favourite and stop tormenting myself hoping to read something useful here.

[rabito79] 11/1/2023 12:11

Haha JakNife, perhaps you should read the post before Forwood's for context.Have you ever considered doing some basic research before you post?