We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.30 | -1.03% | 28.80 | 28.65 | 29.00 | 29.75 | 28.55 | 29.50 | 2,717,471 | 16:35:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0016 | -181.25 | 263.09M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
04/1/2023 23:02 | Truant your effort in trying to make me look stupid has not worked as you also know I am talking about their core holding. Do you have kids and teach them to BS? | padamster | |
04/1/2023 22:48 | "Truant - they sold share options and not shares. I doubt you know the difference."This has to one of the most imbecilic comments to grace this BB board. Frightening | truant2tb1 | |
04/1/2023 22:18 | You know as well as I do they did not sell their core holdings? You also know the price so why are you asking me? If you don’t know read the rns. Another one distorting the truth. Do you teach your kids (if you have any) to adopt this sort of low life antics | padamster | |
04/1/2023 22:13 | They did not sell share options They converted share options into shares and then sold the shares. What was exercise price and reason for options out of interest? | thebull8 | |
04/1/2023 21:29 | Truant - they sold share options and not shares. I doubt you know the difference. Tell the truth man. They retain majority of options and not sold shares. | padamster | |
04/1/2023 21:14 | Jay Cheatham, Bob and co sure did demonstrate some amazing foresight to sell £5m worth of shares in Sept before this flow testGeee - maybe they were onto something!! | truant2tb1 | |
04/1/2023 21:09 | Good old ForwoodBuying the dip like a good lemming. Nevermind:a) the flow test has been demonstrated to be non economic b) still no CPR from Schlumberger 3 months on from being engaged c ) running out of cash and in urgent need of more finance - as per annual reportd) death spiral whirring to issue more confetti's at a 10% discount in 2 monthsAt least you've got the memory of your precious flare cooo xx | truant2tb1 | |
04/1/2023 20:04 | Do not know who he is and yes equally as pathetic | thebull8 | |
04/1/2023 19:59 | The bull, Fraser Perry is talking about going to the FCA still claiming Scot126 is Kay Rieck. Are the rules different for shorters? LKA NPVs of $10.88 for Alkaid @$70. 12M barrels @ $70 = $840M | rabito79 | |
04/1/2023 19:55 | That indicates a return of 28m dollars per year from something like 1billion dollars of oil per year? | bryproj | |
04/1/2023 19:49 | I am referring to the false document that concluded Scot126 was Kay Rieck shared by Alex Stahel whilst copying all prominent PANR shorters. | rabito79 | |
04/1/2023 19:32 | Forwood - thanks all good, that makes sense. The last 1000ft isn't going to be any more productive than the front 4000 and that still makes the production insufficient to justify more drilling, not least before the decline of the lighter products is known. | hpcg | |
04/1/2023 19:30 | Unhelpful where was your free stock reports today | padamster | |
04/1/2023 19:23 | Cor blimey,guv! I am almost too scared to post. The "shorters" were put up against the flare and supposed to burn. It didn't work and so the shorters are to be brought up against the FCA and be burnt a second time. Oh, the inhumanity. The point is being missed. The story has crashed and people are looking amongst the debris for answers. And ignoring the obvious. Your cash is required, again. And lots of it. The Pantheon myth will continue. The bond between company and mug punter is too strong. There is much money to be lost here before peeps realise the game is over. 10p is the target. Be careful. | helpfull | |
04/1/2023 19:21 | The only thing laughable is a return over 107 years. Go calculate the return on treasury bonds over 108 years compounded and come back and tell me which is the better investment | thebull8 | |
04/1/2023 19:20 | Lol!:-)))))))) | chris0805 | |
04/1/2023 19:17 | You didn’t commit to that johnswan (hence my wink 😉). The majority of your posts have talked about either Scot or the Guild and I thought you just needed to let it go but apparently you don’t want that. It does seem it’s got even harder for you to deal with people’s responses to you and the difficulties you have in engaging positively with people…… | probabilityofsuccess | |
04/1/2023 19:08 | johnswan. you're correct about one thing - 'all sorts of nonsense goes on with these BBs and beyond'. but Scot is reliable and lets face it you're a cheap troll. | alaric7 | |
04/1/2023 19:02 | Eh - that calculation is truly laughable.The return is far far higher. | bryproj | |
04/1/2023 19:00 | I was using your figures | mlf51 | |
04/1/2023 18:59 | What false documents? I thought you were referring to the Scot passport? | johnswan193 | |
04/1/2023 18:57 | Okay, so you do think it's okay to mislead people with false documents? | rabito79 | |
04/1/2023 18:54 | Rabito, all sorts of nonsense goes on with these BBs and beyond. Scot has often attributed things to me that I said that weren't true in order to divert attention away from things he said that I was putting him on the spot for, yet a lot of you lapped it up. (POS did something similar today, but on a pointless matter). I suspect somebody else sent them the Scot reveal and they just sent it out, without knowing or caring about whether it was true or not. I believe if you go and put yourself out there as an anonymous poster, and particularly when taking on people posting under their true identities, you always open yourself up to your identity being correctly or incorrectly revealed. People are generally insensitive to the feelings of an anonymous avatar. The way to deal with this is to either prove your identity or simply deny that its you, whether it's true or not. Talk of getting the police or FCA involved is laughable. I believe people are entitled to post under an avatar if they wish, but if you're going to get personal with people who are posting under true identities then you better be prepared for them to do a bit of digging on you. | johnswan193 | |
04/1/2023 18:54 | You just know the share is dead when the LTH resort to collecting data on posters to send to the police/FCA | thebull8 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions