Cor blimey, guv!
You appear to be squirming olderwiser2.
Are you now saying "misinformation" was actually " inferences?
Does this mean you cannot supply evidence for your accusations?
Could you clarify if misinformation is lying?
Could you clarify if inferences is lying?
Could you clarify if misinformation is inference?
It would be useful because some idiot will read what you write and believe it and repeat it.
And when you post that a flare indicates a flow rate of 1500bopd and it turns out to be wildly incorrect and people lose money, is that a lie, misinformation or an inference?
Where are we with:
And you might as well provide the "700 to 900m recoverable barrels. Conservatively valued at $10pb" evidence as well.
And you might provide the evidence where Helpfull posted it is "hate that drives him".
Be careful. |
The share price has dropped from £1.40p to 55p and it's going to drop even further!
You can't ever rule out 10p, it's done it once it can do it again!
Just saying like!
Simples!...... :-) |
The price has gone from 11p to above 55p! Nuff said… |
Oh but the game has just started!.... :-)
Until Panr pay their huge debts and raise sufficient funds to move forward, the share price is going to suffer!.. FACT
Just saying like!
Simples!.... :-) |
The lying trolls are in full flow this evening. That does indicate they are a little worried as to what will happen this week. Why on earth do they bother spending many a long hour posting on here… |
Dear Oh dear, the misinformation team are now denying the inferences, they deliberately set out to create
Game over trolls |
Timberrrrrrrrrrrr!
Just practicing for tomorrow!
Just saying like!
Simples!..... :-) |
LTH'ers!!I wonder what the T.I.T.s (Trolls in Trouble) are thinking tonight??Will they be able to sleep, worrying about how many people will be buying when the market opens .... how many shares will Mangrove going to buy, and how much is it going to cost them closing their short position!!?? Who is going to pay them for their worthless posts!?Will they be able to afford to buy themselves a pot noodle tomorrow??Oh-dear-oh-dear-oh-dear!!GLA LTH'ers!! |
Cor blimey, guv!
"Astonishing insight that a prediction of future spend is an estimate"
Thanks for your confirmation.
I got the impression that most people didn't.
It would be useful to remind viewers that at the Alaska Senate committee meeting your fwend Frank Richards confirmed that estimate never included the Fairbanks spur cost.
So the estimate might not be fit for purpose for the energy needs of the people of Alaska.
Be careful. |
Cor blimey, guv!
olderwiser2, it is you who is posting misformation.
"helpful tried to tell us could be coal"
I remember posting that the Prince Creek was better known for its coal seams.
Please provide evidence that I tried to inform "us" that the liquid hydrocarbons in the Lower Sagavanirktok Formation were coal.
My posts are all available.
I could accuse you of lying or providing misformation, if I was that way inclined.
And you might as well provide the "700 to 900m recoverable barrels. Conservatively valued at $10pb" evidence as well.
And you might provide the evidence where Helpfull posted it is "hate that drives him".
There's always some halfwit like yourself who will believe your misinformation and repeat it if you are not challenged.
Be careful. |
I only had to mention the word f00l and guess who crawled out of his bedsit!...... LOL
No more than the ramper known as rabito aka scot!
Unavoidable dilution coming sooooooooooon!
TICK TOCK
Just saying like!
Simples!.... :-) |
Astonishing insight that a prediction of future spend is an estimate.Keep helping |
olderwiser2 your fellow rampers like to refer to you as the resident expert, I beg to differ!..... LOL
You show your ignorance to the way the market works in every post you write!.... LOL
More f00l you and the Idi0ts that think you are an expert!
Just saying like!
Simples!..... :-) |
Nigoil Are you meaning the kind of dilution at 17p to fund the Megrez 1 well, raising $29m
Resulting in a conventional discovery in the initial range of 700 to 900m recoverable barrels. Conservatively valued at $10pb, Yes "initial" as 3 more discovered reservoirs are yet to be quantified
These would be the 670 ft of net pay, liquid hydrocarbons in the Lower Sagavanirktok Formation, that helpful tried to tell us could be coal, good luck getting that into a coal sack for the kids at Xmas
All culminating in a current share price, despite dilution being 329% higher
I hope we can get some more of that dilution |
After the shorts close It will be interesting to observe, how long helpful continues to post his misinformation
If helpful has been honest that it is hate that drives him to do so, it will continue unabated, until he collapses from mental exhaustion
Watching with more interest, than the shorts are paying in fees to hold their disastrous position, they must rue the day they passed on the option to close at ~11p |
"As Helpfull quickly buried Olderwiser2's informative post, here itv s again..."....... PMSL
It's no more than the usual blah blah blah jam tomorrow!..... LOL
Let's face it the Panr share price is gonna be cruc€f€Ed!.... The market h@tes uncertainty with lots of blah blah blah jam tomorrow!
Panr has incoming debts to pay and requires imminent funding for operations!
Panr will need to raise funds and soon!
Unavoidable dilution coming sooooooooooon!
17p
Just saying like!
Simples!..... :-) |
As Helpfull quickly buried Olderwiser2's informative post, here it is again...
"The relevant details, once again proving, Helpful self declared as turned Hateful (due to trolling trauma LOL), is spreading his decietful misinformation
Capex / Scenarios (2024 US$ million) Alaska LNG Phase 1 mainline1 $10,769 Source: Wood Mackenzie with information from AGDC 1. Considers 20% Contingency and US$50 million of Property Taxes
Pg 16" |
Cor blimey, guv!
Nobster, can you post the lies which you are accusing me of?
Be careful. |
Cor blimey, guv!
You miss the point of the post.
The FEED is to determine an up to date cost for the gasline.
It may be ready by the end of the year, it may not.
Whatever leeway Woodmac might have made is irrelevant because it is only an estimate.
If the pipeline FEED is higher, their estimate won't be wrong because it is an estimate.
It might be, it might not be, but FEED is there for a purpose.
The important point is that the end of year will mean Pantheon are going to IPO before there is any decision as to whether the pipeline is going ahead.
And so finance based on income from gas sales, when or if the pipeline is built, will not be on the table.
So back to the old reliable cash raises.
Be careful. |
As Helpfull quickly buried Olderwiser2's informative post, here it is again...
"The relevant details, once again proving, Helpful self declared as turned Hateful (due to trolling trauma LOL), is spreading his decietful misinformation
Capex / Scenarios (2024 US$ million) Alaska LNG Phase 1 mainline1 $10,769 Source: Wood Mackenzie with information from AGDC 1. Considers 20% Contingency and US$50 million of Property Taxes
Pg 16" |
The relevant details, once again proving, Helpful self declared as turned Hateful (due to trolling trauma LOL), is spreading his decietful misinformation
Capex / Scenarios (2024 US$ million) Alaska LNG Phase 1 mainline1 $10,769 Source: Wood Mackenzie with information from AGDC 1. Considers 20% Contingency and US$50 million of Property Taxes
Pg 16 |
Newcomers,
Obviously, Nobbygnome might be referring to Helpfull's complete lies about me...
1. His claim that I am shorting Pantheon shares - Lie.
2. His claim that I started shorting Pantheon shares at 41p - Lie. |