Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[kenirogas] 30/11/2016 12:58

Syd, put the wooden spoon down :-).. Also, why "after today" ...payment was due mid November, surely?

[syd777] 30/11/2016 12:45

QMC samples could fail with HDR like QD Visions then it's a nightmare scenario for them,even on Film that's the worry with cheap knock out QDs.The colour on the TV will show more RED they have got 3 years before they reach Samsungs standerd and 2 years before Nanos.

[chaba1] 30/11/2016 12:30

Really again QMC.

[enteleon] 30/11/2016 12:30

Slippy- your incoherent rage does not serve you well. In this instance, you were caught by the small slump late on Monday down to 46p. Well, yes, that is the lower boundary of the support between 46-48p, but the share price has recovered and your short has gone wrong. Be manly about it!

Kuss/Mapocho- keep up the good work. But be reassured that some of the rest of us have not sold out. Quite the contrary- I'm buying on dips and will ride out whatever the market throws at us.

Samsung are consolidating their position and so are Nanoco and as you have said repeatedly, "where's the opposition" ?

A small company with major partners with large footprints in all of the US, Europe and Asia with strong IP in a disruptive technology.

[tonsil] 30/11/2016 12:26

Quantum Materials Corp Shipping High Performance Sample Sets, Secures up to $9.75MM FinancingSan Marcos, TX – November 30, 2016 – Leading North American quantum dot manufacturer Quantum Materials Corp (OTCQB:QTMM) (Quantum) today announced that it is shipping high performance red and green cadmium-free quantum dot sample sets to display film manufacturers. Cadmium-free quantum dots are an eco-friendly material that enables energy efficient, ultra-bright displays with a significantly expanded color gamut at a lower cost than competing technologies. "Demand for quantum dot-enabled TVs and displays is growing rapidly," commented Quantum Materials Corp CEO Sri Peruvemba. "Our materials, combined with the efficiency and scalability of our continuous flow production technology, makes us uniquely situated to meet the demand regardless of how fast it grows."

[syd777] 30/11/2016 12:19

With Samsungs buyout of QD vision,where are their old partners looking to now,TCL,Hisence,Sony,Philips and a few TABs for CFDQs?DOW payment due after today and WH might pay a sum for their first shipments,could Merck start to supply Philips?

[fil340] 30/11/2016 11:34

The technology life cycle: R&D - ascent - maturity - decline. It's not exactly difficult to see where CFQD is.

[kuss1] 30/11/2016 11:16

Slip, so on the same logic does Samaung's purchase of QD vision's patents last week make Samsung's IP half baked? That's the logic you are using.

And you are right that Nano can produce CFQD's and has manged to secure supply agreements, paid for in hard earned cash.

The comments on TCL are interesting. Often the journalists get it wrong, but the spec appears on a company news site, so that's different. TCL was with QD vision, then Nanosys. Not sure where they are getting their qdots from but Hansol doesn't supply anyone but Samsung.

That latest blog with emphasis on China also interesting. Quite a few Chinese companies releasing Qdot TV's at CES in January. Probably LG along with them.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/11/2016 11:15

fil
Really

I find the collapsed and continuously depressef share price of Nanoco PLC utterly comforting and reassuring. Rather like walking around wrapped in a large duvet.

Obviously im not alone in thinking that Nanoco technolgy is nothing more than a half baked curiosity that is now failing at the hurdle of commercialisation.

[fil340] 30/11/2016 10:54

A repost:-

A number of the Kodak patents are variations on the same theme: methods of making inorganic LED layers using QD's as a key ingredient (ie QLED). The claims are not especially narrow, which is good, and I have to assume that one of the patents (at least) has framed a QLED composition strategy that Nanoco see as highly relevant to them going forward. Samsung could have aquired these Kodak patents, but chose not to. Probably because they are dependent patents - ie one still needs a supply of QD's to make the QLEDs as described.

Use this search:
AN/Kodak AND "quantum dot" AND electroluminescent

Here:

NB: Not all of the 23 hits are relevant! Happy reading :)

[fil340] 30/11/2016 10:45

I find your fact-free blustering oddly comforting. It's like the babbling of a baby learning to speak.

[slipperysidewinder] 30/11/2016 10:27

It has become blatantly obvious that Nanoco is just an almighty bluff


Yes they are a tecnology company. Yes they csn produce cadmium free quantam dots. Yes they have courted major electronics companies. Yes they have one or two loosely framed supply agreements.

But the purchase if the Kodak IP only reinforces what I have said all along. The Nanoco tech is half baked and doesnt cut the mustard with rhe big OEM's. This fully explains the dragging of heals and willingness to renegotiate by DOW. Seeing it any other way is quite simply ludicrous.

Nanoco, the short of the century for those that walk around with their eyes open.

[lauders] 30/11/2016 00:54

Thanks for mentioning that howl01. For those who like a simple life here is a direct link to the blog:

Not a great deal of new information but I hope the Chinese audience were receptive to Dr. Pang's presentation and Keith Wiggins panel comments:

Nanoco took a leadership role at the conference. Dr. Hao Pang, Nanoco’s Greater China Vice President, gave a powerful presentation to leading Chinese display manufacturers on our CFQD® quantum dots technology and its applications. I was honored to join a prestigious panel of industry leaders discussing quantum dots as the most powerful entrant in next generation display technology.

[howl01] 29/11/2016 23:05

New nanoco blog on their website - wonders never cease

[syd777] 29/11/2016 22:33

Bapuss if your calling me SSW then you followed me 3 weeks back and complained why nano wasn't going down to 30 as I your leader had predicted.

[bagpuss67] 29/11/2016 22:00

Hissing Syd/ slippery sidewinder

they also have similar grammar styles..

...oh and there was the dual post..

[syd777] 29/11/2016 21:18

Whum/slippy any comments before a fight at the AGM ;) I will wear a pink shirt that day, and my Aramis Devin cologne will stink the the whole hall out.

[kenirogas] 29/11/2016 21:05

Baggy, you remember the dual post just after a certain poster's arrival too? ;-) about 18 months ago, IIRC.
Are we finally on the launch pad again?! Gla

[supernumerary] 29/11/2016 20:49

Bagpuss - are you suggesting that not everybody on this board is what he claims? Shame on you!

[syd777] 29/11/2016 20:32

Bagpuss you would of left this BB if you was following slippy.I am with the Legend Mapacho/Kuss and DR ME.

[bagpuss67] 29/11/2016 20:28

Syd/ slippy. Thanks. But still not sure which one of your personalities will prove to be correct.

[bagpuss67] 29/11/2016 18:59

The TCL telly is being reported as using Cadmium free quantum dots. That's quite promising.

[firminator1] 29/11/2016 18:46

Thanks Mr oz and good reffing skills

Merry Christmas everyone !!