Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[slipperysidewinder] 29/11/2016 13:08

My msilbox has s number of messages thst informed my of the suspect technology st Nsnoco.

You can all spout as much conjecture s you wish with your pseudo technical knowledge based oonfar fetched assumption snd bizarre scenarios.

Nanoco is now getting long in the tooth and the brutsl honesty of all this is that Nanoco's ground bresking technolgy is obviously far from ground breaking.

We have a company with hardly any revenue and no profits which is now buying in technolgy that a comptetitor no longer wants.

Dont try snd dress this up as anything different.

[slipperysidewinder] 29/11/2016 12:43

When your technolgy aint up to the job tell everybody it is great sell a load of stock snd make yourself s millionaire. have another fundraising then buy somebody elses.

Ahahahasaaaa hahahahaaaaahahahaaaaaa Ahahahaaaaaaaa hahahahahaa

Its fantastic!#!
ME is truly genius.

[syd777] 29/11/2016 12:18

A few fustrations setting in and slippy pouring salt on the wound,I'm sure more news will come forth,and it could surprise the markets with WH making a killing in the Far East as expected and higher revenue from DOW.It will be happy days at the AGM with over 2 weeks to go,looking forward to meeting Dr ME.

[firminator1] 29/11/2016 11:13

Respect all opinions on here but slippy using rape as an analogy is distaseful to say the least. Assume Mr oz is asleep today.

[roadster750] 29/11/2016 10:46

imho M E is far better being at the heart of the action in the u.s. than wandering the mean streets of Runcorn.

[chaba1] 29/11/2016 10:40

Agreed, Why ME has based in US and I can not find any benefit of it. We should get someone wants to build Nanoco instead of ME wants to enjoy life with his family in his country. Someone should ask why we need to pay him and he does not do proper jobs. What we need now revenue and change CEO.

[fil340] 29/11/2016 10:28

SSW: Why would we need to remove ME at the AGM? Your cleaning lady intel assured us he would be gone by then.

[howl01] 29/11/2016 10:11

I'm still holding however I'm actually finding myself agreeing with slippy here - makes no sense to me - unfortunately can't make it to agm - hoping you guys can ask the tough questions... and maybe enlighten the rest of us :)

[scrutable] 29/11/2016 09:26

It's just not plausible that two giants like Dow and Merck could have been misled to sign serious contracts with Nano, as PIs were by the criminal deceptions/frauds at BioPprogress/Meldex and Globo, but Nano is certainly deficient in marketing and IR and Edelman's plunder of the company in getting his move to the USA paid for,without any commercial benefit to the company, suggests degrees of detachment and integrity missing in a CEO.

Where is there any evidence of appropriate effort to build the business in sales or licences, or even technological advance in the USA? This should be grounds for hard questioning at the AGM. Pity it's not in London. That alone carries a whiff of strategic evasion of shareholders.

[margincall1] 29/11/2016 08:17

As you know I have held this stock for years and I am most frustrated with the speed of income revenue. Now they are spending more! I feel another cash call on the horizon. I don't think I have the stomach for this or the appetite to go to my 6th AGM What do you think PC?

[kuss1] 28/11/2016 23:35

Thanks fil340,

Interesting range of patents.

Can't see why this move is seen negatively. Might save years in research. Bit like QD vision and Samsung. Samsung saw some value in the IP.

But this Qled push is getting very interesting. It's coming and relatively soon. It will revolutionise the display industry and that's a multi-billion industry.

Seems most of the posters on this board have sold out and just appear as a matter of habit. Easy to be negative ... but on an objective assessment there are more positives than negatives. And the market is valuing Nano way above it's earnings so why is that?

Anyway, see what the AGM statement says

[syd777] 28/11/2016 21:04

Best to get the so called bad news out to the markets before the good news ;)

[fil340] 28/11/2016 20:49

A number of the Kodak patents are variations on the same theme: methods of making inorganic LED layers using QD's as a key ingredient (ie QLED). The claims are not especially narrow, which is good, and I have to assume that one of the patents (at least) has framed a QLED composition strategy that Nanoco see as highly relevant to them going forward. Samsung could have aquired these Kodak patents, but chose not to. Probably because they are dependent patents - ie one still needs a supply of QD's to make the QLEDs as described.

Use this search:
AN/Kodak AND "quantum dot" AND electroluminescent

Here:

NB: Not all of the 23 hits are relevant! Happy reading :)

[mr.oz] 28/11/2016 20:02

Kuss, I hear you.
But NANO seem to be dancing to other's tunes and it's a very dull performance just now
This could all change very quickly;an increase in the volume will give us the clue something more dramatic is about to play out

[onething] 28/11/2016 19:39

Kuss, millions would be nice. I have had great success in established businesses that were clearly undervalued as their fundamentals demonstrated. 40p to £2 in a ftse 250 is not to be dismissed as a rash investment. It took 2 years with plenty of scary moments. I have also done well riding the hype in pre-profitable stocks like Globo (how were we to know what a fraud that was) and monitise. And made and promptly lost a serious fortune in QPP (that was just plain foolish). I'm just more cautious now. Hence my stance here.

[kuss1] 28/11/2016 19:26

Oz,its not a scam, but science takes time.

Remember Dow's investment. They are not fools. Neither are Merck.

And that takeover of Qd vision gives some value to Nanos IP. Its the reason we're not at 5p per share. The market is more right than wrong..

[fil340] 28/11/2016 19:21

Can't blame anyone for being cautious. Dow at the cusp is more than enough reason for me to have faith though.

[mr.oz] 28/11/2016 19:17

2 sensible posts with fair unbiased points of view imo
Am also out on sidelines again after trading this from time to time


This could be awesome, and often I imagine the riches to come - but then it lurches the other way and feels very amateurish too (almost scam like sometimes)

Come on NANO, what's the real plan?

[kuss1] 28/11/2016 19:11

Onething, so where have you made your millions? I'm afraid that even with stocks making lots of cash you run the same risk. Not unusual to see 50% drop in most shares.

Nano is in the right indusfry. If you could invest in Qd vision, nanosys or Nanoco there would be no contest for me as the first one has gone bust and the second one will follow shortly.

Qled is coming and the market still doesnt realise.

I prefer an industry analysis to a revenue one.

Anyway, we will get an update in a few weeks at the AGM.