Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 10:06

Kuss

USS selling more than GMT buying.

Dont forget USS have anothet few million to dump. Where will the share price be un a few days once they've jettisoned their remaining stock????

[kuss1] 05/12/2016 10:00

Suppose thats why GMT recently bought 8 million shares.

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 09:54

The stock us now just 3p of its all-time low. Yes 3p!!!!

Despite burning tens of millions of shareholder cash and despite people saying we are on the brink of a quantam dot boom with Nanoco at the forefront.

Think I just watched some swine fly past my window.

[roadster750] 05/12/2016 09:51

"I will say this only six hundred and fifty times"

[mr.oz] 05/12/2016 09:47

It's like an episode of "Allo Allo"

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 09:47

And that is not all. One email i have received talks of product either sitting on the shelves gathering dust or being returned due to quality issues.

Just saying.

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 09:31

I have information if major discontent within Nanoco snd most og it is attached to the CEO ME. I have hear he will not be around much longer. Exactly when i cannot be precise. But the omens gor him are not looking good. Geeks very rarely make good business people.

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 08:37

Haven't seen the kamakazie mapocho since I outed him.

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 08:36

USS dumping large wedges of stock is not going help matters. They sre usually seen as one of the UK's more loyal institutions.

Something has given then the willies.

[jfacwc] 05/12/2016 08:29

have you got a bad cold?

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 08:26

What is more worrying for longs is that in his recent podcast he made absolutely no mention of product sales next year. He just indicated that sales of affordable TV's incorporating Nanoco technology would be painfully slow, and that next year his company will focus on "supporting " his licencees.

Worrying times ahead.

[slipperysidewinder] 05/12/2016 08:21

Nothing

Thst is why I told you to short st the dime of the accountancy discrepency. Any fool could see it coming.

[bagpuss67] 05/12/2016 08:12

What is going to stop this falling between now and the AGM.

[jfacwc] 05/12/2016 07:46

wow! there actually was a short reduction last thurdsday.hardly major.... But at least it proves no-one knows where the share price is going. Here's hoping for a better week.

[firminator1] 04/12/2016 08:08

Also I am more sure syd and slippy same person playing this board. Syd the over optimist who follows on from slippy pessimist who just so happens to have a deliberately distinctive spelling amd grammar problem. Nice try fella.

[firminator1] 03/12/2016 21:53

Kuss1 good post. Nothing wrong with buying and selling as long as it is timed well as minimises the risk. If you have shares in a company you are factually an investor. Whether I am a good one or not will be determined by what Nanoco do because as it stands I am closer to be down on the deal if goes sub 41p. Not out of the question that like most new industry's M & A starts happening so a takeover of Nanoco not out of the question, that as well as faith in merck and dow due diligence keeps my interest levels high

[kuss1] 03/12/2016 21:38

Institutional profile with Nano been the same for years. Some selling on the margin, bit of trading, some redemptions, but essentially the same. USS selling because of a pension shake up in my view.

ME said no funding needed. I suppose it's a question of whether you believe him. Seems most posters don't but I don't think he's a deliberate liar, though he does get things wrong. But so do we all, and the business and the industry is constantly changing so that's an issue for everyone.

If Nano's dots can do 90% of rec 2020 that's a fantastic achievement. Best TV on the market today can only do 76%. The thing is with science is that it's a dynamic and so hard to predict.

I'd be concerned if Nano was a billion pound company but it isn't. It's just 100 million, which in world terms for a high-tech company on a tech revolution is peanuts. The Chinese were willing to pay that for QD vision which has gone bust.

Nano the same price as 2012 way before Dow or the revolution in Qdot display.

Seems most posters on here want security in a risky industry. That's why people like slip appear. But for me, Qdots are a reality and they aren't going away. The number of research centres focussing on this tech is doubling every 6 months. Samsung for me have used a dated tech to get where they are. They are now looking to take qdots to the next stage, and that will still be early for their development.

But unfortunately, most on here calling themselves investors will have bought and sold many times probably on a weekly basis. In fact I sense more than 60% of posters don't even hold a position anymore as they can't stand the uncertainty.

I think Dow, Merck and Wah Hong are deadly serious about Qdots. It's not some sort of game depicted by slip.

But anyway, see what happens at the AGM, CES and the industry as it gains traction.

[jfacwc] 03/12/2016 21:15

maybe the big investors have moved & fancy other (oil) options rather than tech shares.could explain things..The Trump effect.

[onething] 03/12/2016 19:33

In the absence of there being any noticeable volume of tellys out there using our dots, one very big question mark is whether the public will vote with their wallets. Many believe they will. But until it is flying off the shelves it is a very unproven offering.Possibly for a similar reason Tesla shares are going nowhere ahead of the touted 'success' of their ground breaking new affordable electric car.