We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.02 | 0.11% | 18.81 | 18.64 | 18.98 | 19.24 | 18.64 | 19.24 | 1,150,975 | 16:35:10 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0343 | 5.43 | 60.28M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/6/2019 18:18 | Surely only a gain if he uses the money to repurchase the shares?Recent ME sales have not shown dramatic share price changes.Also other directors have not sold.In Dec 2017 it was announced Directors (mostly) would be rewarded with (considerable) additional shares subject to satisfactory 2019/20 share price growth and performance figures.Would ME deliberately affect such a reward? | jfacwc | |
06/6/2019 17:55 | Should have said Not privy to of course | davidw1 | |
06/6/2019 17:54 | Insider trading is of course forbidden for Directors in the same way as it is for PI and others. That is not quite the same as saying the CEO is no better placed to form a better judgement or opinion about the market. Whether ME used his personal judgment to that purpose or not is not something we are privy to and we can each draw our own conclusion. He might just have needed the cash and sold down two thirds of his holding, or there could be more to it? | davidw1 | |
06/6/2019 17:26 | I was thinking about this recently so I checked the law. Here's what I found. (The bottom line is, unsurprisingly, that nothing can be deduced from any Directors' dealings because the law forbids them from using any inside information to make gains relative to the wider market at any time. The same applies to anyone within the company.) | nigwit | |
06/6/2019 16:35 | 200k "gain" for ME on his recent share sales over where we are now. Did anyone ever tot up his total sales volume and average price. | bagpuss67 | |
05/6/2019 18:55 | andy it would be nice to think nanoco cfqd were incorporated in the display. | notimpressed | |
05/6/2019 15:54 | New blog post from Plessey. | nigwit | |
04/6/2019 16:15 | Blue backlight with colour correction. No mention of QD, but what else collour corrects with the right accuracy and quality? | andycapped | |
04/6/2019 14:57 | hTTps usually works ok? | jfacwc | |
04/6/2019 14:32 | I suspect ADVFN does that to some links. Here’s another try. hxxps://www.cnet.com | nigwit | |
04/6/2019 14:16 | NigWit, could I ask that on your links you start them with htt instead of hxx so that they are easier to open. | iomdm | |
04/6/2019 14:09 | hxxps://www.cnet.com Apple pro 6k monitor: HDR P3 WCG and 1000 nits, LED (not OLED). Starts at $5000. Worth keeping an eye open for more specs. | nigwit | |
31/5/2019 19:52 | I suspect this report confirming that, like Nanoco, Apple is working on advanced vehicle technologies may be even more interesting since it adds weight to the speculation that the two companies are partners. hxxps://www.patently Here’s the link to details about folding displays too. hxxps://www.patently | nigwit | |
31/5/2019 19:26 | I’m surprised you have not talked about the new folding Apple phone patent. | mrplay | |
30/5/2019 10:39 | Vexation always rebounds | nigwit | |
29/5/2019 19:22 | The directors cannot be absolved of all responsibility, but taking the charitable view as I said previously, I think they were naive and possibly caught up in their own hubris in not taking into account the practicalities of introducing a new tech into a relatively new market, (the use of cd qd is really only in its infancy) the overarching factor is price, and even though it is nanosys et al pushing for an extension to the cd ban, they are only being driven by their customers. If cd and cad free qd were equitably priced and available in equal quantities their would be no request for an extension. all the above IMO, | notimpressed | |
29/5/2019 17:53 | I think everything, including explanations for past delays, is crystal clear. The company has only ever made statements with the usual warnings and caveats and we are all supposed to be grown ups who understand the risks. What’s more revenue guidance has only been given recently, has so far been correct and the directors have not been drawn on exactly when purchase orders or new deals can be expected. So, if we stay invested and things don’t go as we hope or expect then we are the only ones who are responsible. | nigwit | |
29/5/2019 16:03 | Doh..meant relatively new FD. Brain fade. | meijiman | |
29/5/2019 15:06 | Not expecting a constant commentary, just a reasonable explanation at interim and end of year updates on why commercialisation in display is still absent. They're happy to say when things are/might be coming after all. | andycapped | |
29/5/2019 14:50 | correct..management has consistently over-egged the pudding. Relatively new ceo should be able to bring something more to the table in terms of comms. | meijiman |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions