Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[mrplay] 14/5/2019 18:16

Can a moderator looking into nigwit or Nigel witham multiple accounts and promoting his own posts

[mrplay] 14/5/2019 18:09

Did you just make a mistake and reveal your identity. Do you have multiple accounts. Is that not allowed

[howl01] 14/5/2019 17:49

What drives these completely separate microled displays nigwit? Magic? I'm fascinated.

[nigwit] 14/5/2019 13:41

As luck would have it Vuzix today issued a new press release confirming long-term relationships with Plessey.

hxxp://www.plesseysemiconductors.com/vuzix-long-term-microled-supply-agreement/

[nigwit] 14/5/2019 13:10

No. JDs backplane is for larger displays and is a completely separate development for future large displays that, so far, is not related to the Nanoco and Plessey partnership.

Vuzix and Plessey announced the next generation glasses and small displays in January at CES. These are on silicon wafers. You’ll be able to find the press releases if you search.

[howl01] 14/5/2019 13:02

You're right I can't keep up !!! Vuzix have then managed to develop a product in a matter of days since Plessey have only just announced successful integration of JD's backplane. Good luck with your investing.

[nigwit] 14/5/2019 12:44

I can’t help it if you can’t keep up.

You need to look at Plessey’s relationship with Vuzix who are about to commence manufacturing next generation AR glasses with CFQD microLEDs. These are the new glasses being worn by the model on the press release I linked too. Smart watch-sized CFQD displays screens are also imminent although there has been no disclosure concerning the respective OEM. Given that Plessey’a published accounts reveal they are funded by Deutsche Bank, whose brokerage first disclosed Nanoco’s relations with Apple, it might not be hard to guess who it is though.

Here’s a link to Nanoco’s tweet that carries the same image.

[howl01] 14/5/2019 12:35

You've lost me already nigwit.

Here's where they're at so far.

[nigwit] 14/5/2019 12:25

Here’s the relevant link


hxxp://www.plesseysemiconductors.com/plessey-strategic-alliances-display-week-2019/

[nigwit] 14/5/2019 12:21

Yes I saw that video earlier but it’s misleading to refer to it since it’s not connected with Nanoco, who are present on Plessey’a stand at Display Week today where other products containing CFQDs are being demonstrated.

I expect you know that though and that your post is derived from a need to subordinate the discussion to a prior conclusion that suits an ulterior agenda.

[howl01] 14/5/2019 11:52

My view is any Plessey application, if workable (Nanoco dont have great partnership track record) is way further out than you imagine nigwit.



Hope we see some more information come back from display week though regarding progress.

[mrplay] 14/5/2019 09:28

I’ll give you credit for the last post. It has been forever since I have seen the registered name cfqd used on anything other than nanocos website.

[howl01] 13/5/2019 22:15

Think you're better asking nigwit- luck is apparently on his side (so far) davros

[davr0s] 13/5/2019 22:08

Yeah ask him for this weeks lottery numbers and see how good he is at that

[howl01] 13/5/2019 22:06

No - I'm not - wish I was as he/she seems to have called the last few peaks and troughs scarily correctly - including this one! Another poster you dismissed repeatedly. This really bores me. It's not a board for you to exercise your ego. Credibility zero I'm afraid.

[nigwit] 13/5/2019 21:54

Are you also Crow2? You sound just like him. Getting personal about me whilst making bold statements about the price, which almost invariably turn out to be wrong.

Either way I think you should take your own advice and get off your high horse.

[howl01] 13/5/2019 21:43

This board has been always very open to ideas and useful in the information people post. I'd hate to see that change and a nigwit drama unfold as happened on LSE. Keep it respectful nigwit please - you might even learn something yourself.

[howl01] 13/5/2019 21:38

If i was in profit despite being fundamentally wrong in my basis for investment in the first place I would be a little more humble, reluctant to brag and grateful to lady luck.

[nigwit] 13/5/2019 21:08

I have experienced that and it’s certainly an issue that can arise but there are plenty of of savvy technocrats too. Maybe that’s why LOAM have the option of a board seat (if they hold over 20%) but they must be comfortable with current management since they’ve never taken it.

[davr0s] 13/5/2019 21:01

Ive tried to make money out of Nano in the past but sadly wasn't to be. I came to realise that at the helm was a bunch of academics and not business people. Nothing against academics as I've dabbled in that area myself but they tend not to be very commercial and so it has unfortunately played out over recent years

[nigwit] 13/5/2019 20:53

Not impressed. I know you don’t think Nanoco are dodgy, that wasn’t my point.

Maybe listen to the last presentation again. I don’t think they come across as naive or not market savvy. I think they understand the Display market well and are just as frustrated by the shifting sands of the OEM’s as the rest of us but, at the same time, they are keen collaborators with the US partner, who are still odds on to transform the whole business anyway.

Let me know what you think.

[nigwit] 13/5/2019 20:44

I don’t see any evidence for that. All industry pointers indicate massive widespread take up of QDs and Nanoco have more relevant patents than Nanosys, QMC and Samsung combined.

[bagpuss67] 13/5/2019 20:38

Trouble is nanoco may well have used up all the gooodwill of equity funders. Given the slow progress to which you refer with all aspects of the QD business, if this research project for the US coporate doesn't materialise in the planned timeframes nanoco may be gone, together with your profits