Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[trycky] 09/8/2017 11:47

Slippy you'r getting excited again. Take you'r medication man.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:44

WW

As ususl I see your thoughts are echoed in the share price

NOT

[wigwammer] 09/8/2017 11:35

Any OEM thinking of using cadmium based products as part of their product road map over the next decade will be encouraged rethink this morning.I doubt very much they will get a lot of reassurance reading slippys posts.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:21

mip

Its all about jobs, manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, established networks, and prices for the consumer.

Fortunately for EU citizens, it is not about you and your gsmble on whether Nanoco wll be still open for business a couple of years down the road.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:16

So as you can see, NOT, I repeat NOT by any means a formality.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:14

Furthermore

If, within three months of receiving Parliament's new text the Council approves it, then it is adopted. If it does not then the Council President, with the agreement of the Parliament President, convenes the Conciliation Committee composed of the Council and an equal number of MEPs (with the attendance as moderator of the Commission). The committee draws up a joint text on the basis of the two positions. If within six weeks it fails to agree a common text, then the act has failed. If it succeeds and the committee approves the text, then the Council and Parliament (acting by majority) must then approve said text (third reading). If either fails to do so, the act is not adopted.[2]

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:12

Article 294 TFEU[7] outlines ordinary legislative procedure in the following manner. The Commission submits a legislative proposal to the Parliament and Council. At the first reading Parliament adopts its position. If the Council approves the Parliament's wording then the act is adopted. If not, it shall adopt its own position and pass it back to Parliament with explanations. The Commission also informs Parliament of its position on the matter. At the second reading, the act is adopted if Parliament approves the Council's text or fails to take a decision. The Parliament may reject the Council's text, leading to a failure of the law, or modify it and pass it back to the Council. The Commission gives its opinion once more. Where the Commission has rejected amendments in its opinion, the Council must act unanimously rather than by majority.[2]

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:09

100%

Will you be offering me odds 100 to 1 when I offer you a wsger?

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:07

"This is subject to ratification by the European Council and Parliament over the next two months."

And this my friends simply will not be ratified like hundreds of other things the EU has refrained or delayed in over the years.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 11:04

See more fools got sucked in this morning on the 'game-changing' statement.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 10:58

sd

I was para-phrasing.

It is their intention to make their decision known. This DOES NOT, I repeat, DOES NOT, mean it automatically passes into EU law. Big difference from a nailed on certainty.

And it WILL NOT pass before Christmas as people are suggest. Not this Christmas and not the one after.

[sd_anon] 09/8/2017 10:54

Thanks for your response SSW, I have taken your advice and (re-) read the statement. Nowhere does it refer to 'their intention'. It is to notify 'their decision'. Two rather different things IMO. I asked what your reasoning was and you have shared that, so thank you. Whether or not readers agree with your reasoning is their choice to make. Kind Regards.

[syd7777] 09/8/2017 10:53

I would of like to have seen the ban from October 2018.That would of put the wind on Nanosys and others with immediate effect.

[mip55] 09/8/2017 10:51

Slippery....if YOU read the statement, and I've pasted it for you:The European Commission has this week made public its decision to prohibit cadmium from TVs and displays sold in Europe from October 2019, as part of the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. This is subject to ratification by the European Council and Parliament over the next two months. Cadmium in lighting products will be prohibited with immediate effect, although they are not commercially available.Please could you point out the word 'intention' because all I can see is the word 'decision' ?As for 000's of jobs going perhaps you should consider the amount in percentage terms that CAD based displays actually formed in 2016?I've , once again, helpfully pasted the relevant section of the RNS for you:Cadmium-based technology has been a non-starter from the beginning. This is a failed technology that has been abandoned by leading international display manufacturers and rejected by consumers. Data shows that nearly 519 million Wide Color Gamut (WCG) displays were sold globally in 2016. Of that number, fewer than 400,000 products (or 0.08% of the market) containing cadmium were sold.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 10:49

This could end the week st a medium term low.

So much for the certsinty of the impending cad bsn. Lol

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 10:39

Read the statement. It is to make known their intention. They quite simply will not get it through as I have said for 5 YEARS!!!

The ban would destroy thousands of jobs sccross Europe snd msssively increase prices for the consumer.


You will all see thst the csn will be kicked further down the road. Again.

[bagpuss67] 09/8/2017 10:04

"The European Commission has this week made public its decision to prohibit cadmium from TVs and displays sold in Europe from October 2019"

Slippy says it hasn't...hmm who do I believe the European commission or a day trader posting from their bedroom...

[luxaeterna1] 09/8/2017 10:03

The US media is now reporting North Korea as capable of building a nuclear weapon in a suitcase, that's pretty much the false flag lie they need to justify armed conflict.

Or am I too cynical?

[sd_anon] 09/8/2017 09:47

SSW are you able to offer any reasoning or logic for that or are you just getting a feeling in your waters?

[sd_anon] 09/8/2017 09:46

Markets overall are dropping today in anticipation of WW3. That's probably putting a dampener on the upside. Nevertheless this is undoubtedly good news in the medium to long term.

[slipperysidewinder] 09/8/2017 09:43

There will be no ban in 2019 or even 2025.

[bagpuss67] 09/8/2017 09:30

LO offloading still perhaps. As others have pointed out that isn't necessarily correlated to some bad developments at the company and could be their internal policies.