Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[hannath] 09/6/2017 10:57

with x8 weeks to the next trading statement I can only see this sliding further for now, unless of course ........ sales orders appear .... but been holding my breath on that one for around x3 years now.

[boris cobaka] 09/6/2017 10:04

volume picking up a tad as we dip below the support line of the bull flag. Looks like some bailing and not prepared to wait any longer. My 35p might be here sooner than I expected.

[bagpuss67] 09/6/2017 07:48

Somebody certainly has been milking the cow , the cash cow

[boris cobaka] 09/6/2017 07:42

At least we have a cow....
Just gotta know how to milk it. Who wants a teat?

[ih_169538] 08/6/2017 21:46

If you were sold magic beans and they didnt grow anything after 3 years ,wouldnt you give up instead of watering them anymore ? Maybe thats how DOW feels ? Merck trying the same with same effect ?

[boris cobaka] 08/6/2017 10:47

ba(humbug)laura

Know any 'no win no fee' guys...
It's patently obvious they're gonna go bust...

[balaura] 08/6/2017 10:31

Every potential buyer of dots from either Dow or Nano has contemplated placing orders during the past years...and decided not to place them. Let's say the price was an issue...then they just have to wait for Nano's competition to catch up or for desperation to reach explosion levels. Let's say Nano agrees to sell at very discounted prices. Would Nano still be able to make a profit (aka survive)? Would any OEM decide to invest in a product line using supply from a company which may disappear in the near future?

[balaura] 08/6/2017 10:30

If I were employed by Nano and facing the almost certainty of being laid off (unless a miracle happens)in as little as 6 months time, I would already look for a job elsewhere. Nanoco has no means of maintaining its people for longer. Without them, Nano is nothing but a bunch of patents (patents that can't even be defended without cash). Once losing its people, where would the income come from? Licence fees...? From whom....? Not Merck! Almost one year on, and Merck has not even announced the intention of building a factory. The best outcome would be for Merck to buy Nano...soon, very soon.

[boris cobaka] 08/6/2017 08:34

lol

Are you sure you're not Fraser....

Volume just barely a trickle so we're seeing some hijinks with the share price at the mo.
As I mentioned a couple of days ago they've just about broken (at least intraday) the bottom of the bull flag channel but this has taken place without any supportive volume.
Watch for the reversal and likely breakout to the upside. May not be today or tomorrow but within the next few sessions.

[andycapped] 08/6/2017 08:10

They should still have revenue coming in from Wah Hong, as they should have been selling them resin. If not what have they been making at Runcorn all this time?

[bagpuss67] 08/6/2017 08:03

Well I've reduced again. I think they were banking on Wah hong by the year end and Dow have scuppered that so there will be a delay until they come on line. In the meantime they have the year end and the auditors will have difficulty with the going concern statement and they will need to raise some cash at maybe 30p to get over that line. all IMHO.

Plus that bat ears double top always seems reliable with nano (more professionally fingers said it could resume the down channel...

[jfacwc] 08/6/2017 07:26

have to agree. And the reports they generate look so plausible.Does this mean no 'research' can be beleived? (seeing as how we are all told to do our own?

[boris cobaka] 08/6/2017 06:22

flippin' Edison. didn't do their research tsk...

[lauders] 08/6/2017 05:07

In short we just need news about INCOME syd! When that comes things may look rosy for NANO. Until then the share price will stay around these levels. Not too worried now as have a very small holding and my capital is not tied up here while we wait so I can sleep more easily at night.

[syd7777] 08/6/2017 03:38

Even if Runcorn has no orders by the end of July.The company has no debt or loans.The worst scenario Relying on DOW and maybe Merck royalies.The present government will provide 2 million in February along hopefully a bit for the graphine side.WH spending millions for the second line with the latest tech about to be the one of the worlds only 100" film producers.The very temporary short will even scare Slippy to borrow.Anything from Runcorn is a massive windfall as the royalties coming from DOW and Merck will no doubt add to the cash flow, and if you think labour will win and WH fail,then think twice.enough cash to sustain Nanoco without WH and Runcorn until this time next year.IMO

[ih_169538] 08/6/2017 01:36

Having a product and a stable product are two different things.Perhaps testing by OEMs isnt yielding the results hoped for.

[bagpuss67] 07/6/2017 20:52

Lombard and mr g to buy back the shares they have sold at over 40p at 30p in placing and watch the share price then return to 40p on the relief rally?

[perfect choice] 07/6/2017 20:46

Only watching now Whum and not a holder. Curious as to what the end result will be here with Nano. Still cannot work out how a company with multiple agreements can be in a position of no supply sales by now. Maybe it is down the the display manufacturers holding all the cards and they decide despite what Nano say. I am truly wondering what the result will be here as something to learn for my investment strategy for other stocks. I actually want Nano to succeed for just being a UK company dominated by USA competitors and so the best of luck to holders. But right now I am simply confused as to what is happening here.

[notimpressed] 07/6/2017 19:15

rumour has it nanoco are developing an anti gravity machine

[onething] 07/6/2017 18:46

Whum, to bring you up to speed, now the orders slated for May have not appeared the new story is that it was always meant to be by year end, vaguely buying another month or two of utter nothing.

[whum] 07/6/2017 18:42

PC are you still here?
any thoughts on nano, after the constsnt promises of
jam tomorrow from ME