Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[mrplay] 27/2/2017 13:51

38p now. Getting lower. Nanoco ME silent

[mrplay] 27/2/2017 11:44

Who else could dow supply if not LG and samsung. Also Dow talked about growing sales in semi conductors. Part of nano? What factual do we have? Nano have to come out in April. Until then what can they do? Any update on caroline's big long holiday?

[andycapped] 27/2/2017 10:58

Should bear in mind that Dow coughed up for the newer processes from Nanoco. Don't think they'd have done that if they had no intention of supplying someone.

[jfacwc] 27/2/2017 10:38

lux, that news is particularly old.It had its desired effect then.Don't think it helps to dig it up again. Things could well have changed since, behind the scenes, in many ways.

[millsawm] 27/2/2017 09:40

Crunch, Why are you here? You have no interest in Nanoco, and are just here to shout about QMC and their continuous flow process. I am sick of reading it.

[luxaeterna1] 27/2/2017 09:17

ih, here is why Samsung dropped Dow, the public version of it at least:

hxxp://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2015/04/133_176411.html

"Hansol Chemical has been named as the primary supplier for quantum dot materials to be used in Samsung premium TVs, pushing Dow Chemical into the secondary position,"

"He said talks between Samsung Electronics and Dow Chemical failed as the two differed over licensing fees."

"Dow asked Samsung for too much for their quantum dot materials as Samsung intends to grow the quantum dot TV market with no huge price barrier to consumers"

[ih_169538] 27/2/2017 00:07

I'm waiting for you to supply the answers ?Surely you must have a theory why three major companies dropped Nanoco and why the fourth hasn't sold commercial quantities to date ? I'm sure ME whispered it to you at the AGM ,then again his American accent might have been a translation issue you are having and can't report it without an English to English translator present.

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 23:42

Crunch useless information keep taking to yourself

[ih_169538] 26/2/2017 23:34

Your so confused about QLED it's hilarious..anyone making QLED products will require even more qdots than current film.QLED will be made by the OEMS not Nanoco or Nanosys or QMC.QD suppliers are not film manufacturers or led manufacturers as the infrastructure costs and expertise is not in their abilities.QLED in the electroluminescent is still a few years away,QLED in the photoluminescent is just here now because of Samsung and is costly at present.QD LEDS are here for awhile, probably for the next 5-10 years with QLED on the horizon.You seem unable to explain the fact 3 major companies are no longer working with Nanoco and another reduced their royalty agreement and has zero commercial sales to date ?

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 23:25

Nanoco RnD will be 6 million this year from the AGM meeting that's less then 50% of the budget QMC has to still start it's foolish failing flow rubbish that will be no use in 2 years.Yes crunch QMC is worth billions. Lolzzx

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 23:17

Crunch..seeking the truth lolzz explain the CEO going,no products,still a dire MC as you know it's pump and dump the rubbish.Dreaming will not help get DOW and Merck to take up the a company that's going the way of QD vision except they have no RnD for QLED or Nanorods.You always avoid the real truth and exaggerate your dream boat scenario.lolzzzzzzz

[ih_169538] 26/2/2017 23:00

BTW Syd your batting zero in the prediction department.In fact happy to take you up on that bet that QMC isn't bought out or broke.

I'm just here seeking the truth !

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 21:58

The moaners will disappear soon and then the doom mongers will be back in.The repeat of last year is not taking hold as big things are brewing.

[notimpressed] 26/2/2017 21:52

oz, maybe a consultation with mystic meg could provide
enlightenment

[mr.oz] 26/2/2017 21:40

Anyone got any new news, preferably without conjecture?

Thank you

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 21:22

Crunch lolzzzzzzzzz I knew you would comment over a flow process that is second to Hansol and Nanoco lolzzzz. The process is as good as your Indian Doctor CEO that you last bragged about,he ran for the hills lolz.Pump and dump about to take hold as no real products will be coming sooooon.lolz. Market cap going back to the 30 million lolzz.10 cents a share lolz.You think the truth is QMC while Hansol and Nanoco are failures with their batch process.The truth is coming watch this space.A company that has no future with QLED or Nonorods is doomed after a little demand for the out off date tech. Lolzzzzzz

[ih_169538] 26/2/2017 21:06

Lol..Syd Syd Syd...Nanoco rejected Bayer patents?? Lol..they never even knew about them.Wasn't it also ME who stated QNC was broke..lol..I think he's a little worried about now.The guys at QDV laughed at the mention of QMC a few years back as well ..and..well they are gone now so who's laughing now ?I said to get in when you had a chance to switch and get on the QMC train a few weeks back at a low..now up almost 300% with strong volume with blue skies ahead.Good luck however you play it and good fortunes.

I'm just here seeking the truth !

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 20:13

WH commercial order is a month away if not weeks.The need for over 65" TVs and large signage is coming from most OEMs.There will be plenty of demand for CF and supply could be limited.DOW and Merck have no doubt seen the future upturn with QDs,while DOW has had a rough ride with Samsung,LG in the past,the tables will turn sooner rather then later.The batch process has been favoured by both Hansol and Nanoco so the question mark remains with QMCs flow process as ME said at the AGM they rejected it from Bayer.There is no doubt some Chinese OEMs would want to take up that process as its a copycat version that's doomed to fail in the long term like most of their products.

[ih_169538] 26/2/2017 19:46

Why continue on the cadmium trail when there is no future in it?Nanoco has no cadmium either ? Isn't the whole promo from Nanoco based on being cad free ??Now you wan't cadmium production ??QMC stated their partners wanted cad free not cadmium.Your comments are confusing at best.

I am just here seeking the truth !

[kuss1] 26/2/2017 19:18

Crunch, Qtm also have no commercial sales. Don't you think there is an issue there? And they pretend to have both cadmium and cadmium free tech. Why haven't they managed to sell cadmium Qdots? Nanosys have done so successfully, they just can't produce cadmium free even though you claimed many times they could.

You criticise to promote. A failed strategy I'm afraid.

[ih_169538] 26/2/2017 18:05

Kuss ,4 years with Dow and still no commercial sales and you don't think there is an issue ?Over a year ago Samsung rejected Dow/Nanoco product because of quality and pricing.Dow then renegotiated the royalty structure and still can't get the pricing issue in their favor.This material is inly going to get less costly as it moves forward so tell me where is their competitive advantage on just cost alone.They were dropped by both Tokyo Electron and Osram because of material issues as well as LG with a failed display.Those are facts that state there is a product issue.As far as mass production it is batch or semi batch for Nanoco which is something they have stated many times.It is not continous flow technology which is the only way to mass production.If you think replicating buildings like Hansol currently has for their output to create tonnage then this industry will never take off.Its all about Capital costs and Operating costs ,even Samsung admitted Hansol can't currently reduce either of these and quite frankly only one company has that ability because of its process.

"Our proprietary volume QD production process is fulfilling its promise to deliver quantum dots at favorable price points and at a scale unequalled by our competitors’ batch processing methods.”Stephen Squires Quantum Materials Corp

[syd7777] 26/2/2017 16:33

LGs G6 phone is being hyped as having LCD IPS quantum dot tech..I'm sure the dots will come to mobiles soon.