Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[wjs81] 23/2/2017 13:57

With respect mrplay, the perennial cynics, doom-mongers and game-players have been predicting low 20's and low 30's for a long time now and it hasn't happened.

I take your point that we're being manipulated and that until news of income comes along we remain at their mercy, but I don't believe we'll go much lower than this unless we have to wait until the next accounting year for revenue.

[mwwh] 23/2/2017 13:57

It does appear that the stock is being manipulated--Small trades on the way down, much larger trades on the way up. On the other hand, the recent interview with Wiggins indicates that Samsung is lost to Nanoco. It is not a particularly good sales tactic to imply that a major customer or prospect (Samsung) has been misleading the market with its QLED trademark.

[notimpressed] 23/2/2017 12:57

and still no news or comment the bod

[mrplay] 23/2/2017 12:50

Wow 38.50 Getting lower and lower. This share has been manipulated from the beginning. Unless news comes soon it will get to low 30's when either a low buyout or extra cash needed. Sickening that it has been allowed to happen. Notice the difference between Paul O’Brien and Mike. Paul has never sold and kept all bonus shares. Mike sells at any chance. Paul is the brains, Mike the one who screws up the deals.

[mr.oz] 23/2/2017 11:59

Materially below expectations

[notimpressed] 23/2/2017 11:57

it is the II's who have the power, pi's are mere bystanders.

[andycapped] 23/2/2017 11:53

I certainly think there are ulterior motives for this poncing about with the share price.

More and more I'm thinking a take over bid is on the cards, and PI's are being massaged in the hope they'll accept a low bid.

[mr.oz] 23/2/2017 11:20

No problem minsky, especially when you make us laugh

[minsky] 23/2/2017 11:13

so Jeremy's highest educational qualifications are two Es at A level, despite going to a private school
(apologies for going off topic again)

[minsky] 23/2/2017 11:09

this is like a game of chicken, in slow motion

[loldemort] 23/2/2017 10:59

I see Jeremy Corbyn (like Bill Gates!) did not finish his degree.

[jfacwc] 23/2/2017 10:56

Bagpuss, that news has been known for quite a while? Also LG still had, (or had announced), interests in (CF) QD's on other ranges?can't quite see the puposes of your posts notimpressed, apart from being an irritation, to an existing depressing situation. Although you've actually no need to write anything in your posts, as your name says it all.

[notimpressed] 23/2/2017 10:36

volume rising, price falling, the omens are not good

[andycapped] 23/2/2017 10:21

From what has been said, the nanocell TV is not quantum dot based. Uses another nanocell technology.

[notimpressed] 23/2/2017 10:09

if not nano, who is supplying LG?

[bagpuss67] 23/2/2017 09:18

LG launching the nano cell TV. Shame DOW managed to fail to supply them Quantum dots as originally hoped for.

[onething] 23/2/2017 00:31

Who gives a f@@@ what people got at uni. It's like putting your o level grades on a job app in your 50s. What matters is that certain individuals made it to pm or president. That should be enough validation of ability. Gates and many others didn't even graduate. Out of choice. Try going head to head with these guys in a discussion. You may realise they have an edge you can only dream of. Not so sure about trump in this particular argument as he does appear to be incapable of forming coherent sentences. However, how many posters on this board could carry off what trump has done? I think most (all?) keyboard jockeys posting here lack the ability to lead our country or any country. But I support your right to sneer (I mean appraise).

[a.fewbob] 23/2/2017 00:28

Watch this short clip, the way we are deceived is truly disgusting.

[minsky] 23/2/2017 00:09

Tony Blair: Second-Class Honours BA in Jurisprudence from Oxford in 1975 (Oxford didnt differentiate upper and lower second class degrees until a few years later).
Barrack Obama: BA in political science, international relations and English literature from Columbia University, New York in 1983. Theres a lot of speculation on the internet about his grades etc.
David Cameron: First in PPE from Oxford in 1988.
David Milliband: First in PPE from Oxford in 1988.
Ed Milliband: 2:1 in Politics and Economics from Oxford in 1992.

[enteleon] 22/2/2017 22:34

I think Tony Blair got a Third at Oxford (known in the trade as a "Gentleman's degree"); Obama was a law professor; I doubt very much that Cameron is bright enough to have achieved a First; Milliband probably did- both brothers are seriously bright whatever you think of them politically.

Then again, you can have a shed-load of Ph.D.s and that doesn't necessarily make a company successful !!!

[a.fewbob] 22/2/2017 21:58

If I was a rabbit, I'd be this one.

[notimpressed] 22/2/2017 21:52

bob you are not a happy bunny,