We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lo-Q | LSE:LOQ | London | Ordinary Share | GB0001771426 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 680.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/2/2013 21:13 | Eddie, No different than all the jobs posted on their website. FPR. | flashpassrules | |
20/2/2013 20:26 | For interest, another Lo-q job description (six flags over Georgia) | eddie catflap | |
20/2/2013 18:30 | Great post Davidosh, appreciate the advice and the sentiment. LOQ is a mere 2 bagger to me but enjoying the ride all the same. | tudes100 | |
20/2/2013 17:39 | nomunnofun...I am not here to teach anyone anything BUT one thing that I have personally learned with growth stocks and strong stories that build with good newsflow...I never ever sell out completely but prefer slicing little amounts as the share price hits targets or becomes too large a part of my portfolio. That way I win if the share price continues up as I still have say 80% of my original holding and still feel good if the price falls as I managed to sell some when they were higher. I can always rebuy if it falls too low of course. I learned a big lesson selling 100,000 ASOS shares at a 70% gain from when I bought them at 7p only eight years ago....they are £27 now !! If only I had sliced those and held even just half of them still now. I can honestly say that I will never sell ALL my LOQ shares and will probably only leave through the door marked cash takeover but we all know that is not going to be for just £5 and it could be more than double this price. I am a very happy eight year old...holder !! | davidosh | |
20/2/2013 17:07 | I know! I know! I KNOW! | nomunnofun | |
20/2/2013 16:55 | We've a lot further to rise if we replicate 1st Quarter last year - See my post 9777 spud | spud | |
20/2/2013 16:55 | Sold out yesterday at 485 - average was 120p. Amazing how selling too early (it would seem) always feels much worse than selling too late. Ah well!! | nomunnofun | |
20/2/2013 16:49 | Rock and roll!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-) :-) | itchycrack | |
20/2/2013 16:21 | Hi Davidosh was there an explanation at the recent Mello event about the IP licensing agreement and where they go from here with that? | helpaargh | |
20/2/2013 16:07 | Some very large trades going through btw and over £1.2m of stock has traded already today. At Mello TB said that there was very strong demand from institutions even though they now own nearly 60% of the company and you know that there is heavy demand when your broker is being asked if their known holders want to sell any stock ! | davidosh | |
20/2/2013 15:16 | Another milestone, 500 breached. | bullsvbears | |
19/2/2013 08:59 | SM OK, thank you. I thought for one minute that you were suggesting that LOQ was unable to keep an accurate picture of how many customers had used their product and what fees should be expected from their usage. It doesn't sound like you are suggesting that. Cheers, Martin | shanklin | |
19/2/2013 08:56 | Shanklin, That comment was about the perception of doing business in Asia - small operators of which there are many in the fragmented industry are likely to seek advantages at any cost. Therefore, it's unlikely LOQ would wish to partner with them, when the bigger operators are there to be won and whose reputation would most likely prevent them employing underhand tactics. At least, that was my understanding of the comment. TB mentioned that in China alone, there are 300 big theme parks built or being built (much like the many airports under construction there), and there's plenty more to target via the Sanderson tie-up in Asia. Hope that clarifies a little. SM | strollingmolby | |
19/2/2013 08:45 | Many thanks for your report Strolling. For those who didn´t make it to last night´s meeting but would still like to hear Tom Burnett speak about his plans, it is worth repeating that there is a very interesting interview with him here: | orange1 | |
19/2/2013 08:15 | SM Please would you clarify "Asia-go hammer and tongs to sell. Will probably be ripped off by small operators - big firms won't as will protect reputation." Thank you, Martin | shanklin | |
18/2/2013 23:43 | Super thanks SM! :-)spud | spud | |
18/2/2013 21:55 | You should do your homework sir leoshi*te before mouthing off again! BACK ON FILTER! | itchycrack | |
18/2/2013 21:44 | I bottled it and sold today. The price has run too far ahead of earnings for me. | zoolook | |
18/2/2013 21:25 | Yes Itchy. Not only have you had the forethought & good fortune to have bought @ that level but you have had the balls & patience to have held. That is quite something in this world of instant gratification where 1 week is a lifetime to most. spud | spud | |
18/2/2013 20:56 | .....still can't believe I bought these beauties for less than 10p, my best investment ever (so far) :-) :-) | itchycrack | |
18/2/2013 15:46 | David - Can you raise the question regarding a Main Market listing as opposed to AIM. This would surely raise the profile of the Company whilst allowing additional Institutions to buy in. Long term, although there is no need to raise at present, is a dual Nasdaq listing. Thanks David spud | spud | |
18/2/2013 14:39 | Getting interesting now. | pip_uk |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions