ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

55.52
-0.02 (-0.04%)
31 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.02 -0.04% 55.52 55.34 55.38 55.78 55.16 55.66 352,448,137 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.45 35.2B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 55.54p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 57.22p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £35.20 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.45.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 328501 to 328519 of 427575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  13143  13142  13141  13140  13139  13138  13137  13136  13135  13134  13133  13132  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
04/10/2020
10:12
'The 35-year-old's job as an analyst ended in June, but her husband is still working and she benefited from a temporary $600 boost to weekly unemployment payments Congress approved in response to the crisis'


$600 a week????wow, i could live a life a luxury on that, and $1200 if there are two of you???

mikemichael2
04/10/2020
09:59
The virus will always get through.Unless you live on a tiny island in a sterile room and see no-one and covered in clingfilm.Trump shows that.It will get everyone.Massive survival rate.
xxxxxy
04/10/2020
09:56
Anybody running the Virtual Marathon?...
diku
04/10/2020
09:55
The rule of 6By JOHNREDWOOD | Published: OCTOBER 4, 2020On Tuesday night Parliament will have the chance to debate and vote on the Rule of 6 and the related restrictions against larger gatherings.The decision will be about the Coronavirus Restrictions (No 2) (England) Statutory Instrument.As someone who wishes to see more moves to relax controls that damage business and prevent large sectors that need social contact from working, there is a good case for not supporting this measure. As someone who wishes to see the death rate down and agrees that too much social contact can spread the virus too far too fast I need to listen to those who say there is a case for trying these controls for a bit longer.The rule of 6 is the government's latest attempt to create a simple universal rule that might provide some brake on the spread of the disease. It has not been going for long, so the government says it should be tried for longer. You can also argue that we have had controls in place for many months, but they have not proved able to keep the disease down in the way a near total lock down for most did in April. Some think the virus has a life of its own regardless of controls and see the fall from April as a coincidence. Others seek to find patterns in the numbers to prove controls do reduce the spread.The Conservative party membership is shifting its view from a substantial majority behind lock downs and strong government action, to the largest group now favouring the more relaxed Swedish approach to create a better balance for business and normal life. Polls of the wider public still favour tough action to limit social contacts. There is a lack of specific scientific data to show which of the various measures tried in the areas visited with extra controls have a beneficial impact. There is also a worrying delay in getting results in those special areas and in some cases no evidence that the controls are working. The 10pm curfew is the most dubious and contentious ban, but that is not up for a vote on Tuesday.I am interested in your views as I make up my mind concerning Tuesday's vote, particularly if you are a constituent.
xxxxxy
04/10/2020
09:48
Also we will have left the EU by the time the OVER paid bureaucracy in Europe gets to court. Roll on January 1st hopfully with a deal but if not hey ho.
inntolife
04/10/2020
07:46
Apparently the E.U have no case against the U.K because the bill in question hasn't become an act .
mitchy
04/10/2020
07:41
Warren Buffett is saying buy cheap U.K shares and build a retirement fund. I agree, however , to get the best price you have to get the timing right. Is this level the cheapest or will lloy ,for example , see 20p ? Perhaps the best strategy is to just buy the dips. Unfortunately I've been doing that from 64p !Now averaging circa 40p. I guess I'm lucky that I don't need to draw on my 'retirement' fund to pay every day bills but others aren't going to be so fortunate. 20p is a possible.Good Luck.
mitchy
03/10/2020
23:22
And there c 3.5million here - many in rural areas
WOS all politicians

jl5006
03/10/2020
23:18
Tricky
Very few ppl use public transport in Wales - Y - bcos most of the country is in lockdown

jl5006
03/10/2020
22:08
How the BBC save our money to pay massive salaries for their stars.. Byrepeating over and over thesame news 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
k38
03/10/2020
21:36
Very few people use public transport in wales.
utrickytrees
03/10/2020
21:29
Nothing is as certain as a closed mind.
minerve 2
03/10/2020
20:54
Common sense.


Where has it gone?

maxk
03/10/2020
20:45
Liam halligan economist d Tel
20 • 4:00pm
Liam Halligan
Very few senior economists are also talented writers. One who I think ticks both boxes is Andy Haldane. Last week, the Bank of England’s chief economist gave a well-crafted speech entitled “Avoiding Economic Anxiety”, riffing on a much-loved children’s story.

“Encouraging news about the present should not be drowned out by fears for the future,” said Haldane, to a Covid-compliant meeting of the Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership. “Now is not the time for the economics of Chicken Licken.”

This was the folklore fowl, of course, who felt an acorn drop on his head. Worried the sky would fall in, Chicken Licken whipped up terror among the other farmyard animals. Seeking refuge in the forest, they got eaten by a nasty fox.

Haldane’s point is that overly pessimistic views about the risk from coronavirus, and lockdown, are holding back the British economy. You may think that’s a brave argument, given that the Office for National Statistics just reported UK GDP shrank 19.8pc between April and June. When added to the 2.5pc first-quarter reduction, that confirms the deepest recession in recorded British history.

UK GDP has recovered to 2013 levels – but the pace of recovery is slowing
Line chart with 163 data points.
GDP index, monthly
View as data table, UK GDP has recovered to 2013 levels – but the pace of recovery is slowing
The chart has 1 X axis displaying Time. Range: 2006-11-12 16:48:00 to 2020-08-19 07:12:00.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Range: 75 to 110.
End of interactive chart.
Haldane argued, though, that the second-quarter monthly breakdown showed that while the economy fell off a cliff in April and May, when the lockdown was tightest, it bounced back strongly during June.

The media must avoid “catastrophising”, he said, lest ongoing bad outcomes become a self-fulfilling prophesy. “This is human nature at times of stress – but it can also make for an overly pessimistic popular narrative, which fosters fear, fatalism and excess caution.”

The UK faces an “unholy trinity of risks from Covid, unemployment and Brexit”, Haldane acknowledged, but the encouraging post-lockdown recovery “should not be overlooked”.

Forecasting 20pc quarter-on-quarter GDP growth when the July-to-September figures are published, he argued the economy could already be just 3-4pc smaller than before any of us had heard of Covid-19.

While readers may scoff, there is something in Haldane’s argument. Many journalists – especially broadcast journalists – do emphasise bad news. And few drill down beyond the basic headline numbers.

While retail sales collapsed in the face of the lockdown, we’ve since seen a clear V-shaped recovery. The latest data show strong growth during successive months from May through to August, with overall monthly sales now 4pc higher than in pre-lockdown February – although considerable volume has migrated from the high street to online.


I don’t buy Haldane’s projection, though, that unemployment will be limited to 7.5pc ­– or 2.5m people – by the end of this year. The Bank of England is pointing to the official jobless definition, which requires unemployed workers to be actively looking for work.

Few are, because of Covid – as Economic Agenda has been pointing out for months. Claimant count measures, based on those receiving unemployment-related benefits, are already up at 2.7m.

On top of that, there are another 3m on furlough. And a high proportion will unfortunately lose their jobs when the scheme ends at the end of this month, despite Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s recently announced incentives to keep workers on.

I’m sticking with my prediction, which it brings me no pleasure to repeat, that we’re looking at unemployment of up to 4m, over 12pc of the workforce.

That’s based less on any inherent pessimism than a close examination of HMRC payroll data and detailed discussions with Whitehall economists and other labour market specialists who, wisely perhaps, won’t talk on the record.

Rising again
Line chart with 151 data points.
The total Universal Credit and Jobseeker’s Allowance claimant count rose during July
View as data table, Rising again
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Range: 0.5 to 3.
End of interactive chart.
I also fear that Haldane, with good intentions, is underplaying the disastrous impact these latest lockdown measures – the rule of six, curfews and more stringent local restrictions – are now having on a whole range of businesses.

The city mayors of Liverpool, Leeds and Manchester just warned about renewed collapse in their respective retail and hospitality sectors following new anti-Covid controls. Highlighting the “huge, disproportionateR21; economic impact, they reported hotel occupancy cut to 30pc, with high street footfall up to 70pc down.

Many businesses, the mayors said in a joint letter to ministers, “face the prospect of a complete decimation in trade, not just in the short term but as we look ahead to the sector’s traditional lifeblood of the Christmas period and almost certainly continuing into spring/summer of next year”.


Their forecast of “mass market failure” and “huge redundancies” sounds entirely justified to me. While we are not yet back in full lockdown, the current restrictions are stymying some sizeable business sectors that, over the summer, seemed to be on the brink of recovery – not least events, entertainment and the arts. Transport firms also perhaps face a permanent reduction in demand as more people work from home.

Above all, as we move into winter, business leaders can sense that, whatever the emerging evidence, this Government remains hell-bent on using draconian lockdown measures to suppress the virus until a vaccine emerges.

Yes, daily Covid cases are roughly where they were back in April, at the height of the pandemic. But we’re now doing around 12 times more tests.

The daily hospitalisation rate of Covid patients, meanwhile, has fallen to just one-eighth of its spring peak, with the numbers unfortunately dying – the vast majority of whom are over-70s with pre-existing conditions – down from over 1,000 a day when cases were last this high, to low double-digits now.


The UK economy faces lots of risks but, as Haldane rightly argues, our collective future is not lost. Britain remains a world-class economy, full of brilliant, creative, entrepreneurial and, above all, hard-working people. We can and will bounce back.

Our biggest threat, though, would be a failure to rationally analyse and respond to the emerging evidence not just on Covid cases but, above all, hospitalisations and deaths.

An increasing number of highly reputable scientists and medics now back an age-stratified approach, shielding the elderly and vulnerable, while the rest of us build natural population immunity.

As the economic, emotional and human cost of lockdown grows, and with far more of us now dying from flu and pneumonia than Covid, pressure is growing for a wholesale change to our strategy. Covid is no acorn. But when it comes to dealing with this virus, we shouldn’t be Chicken Licken.

Related Topics

jl5006
03/10/2020
20:34
K38
The propaganda channel BBC will cause u immense harm - I have to say that the BBC has created more fear than should be.
Each year there is a flu type virus and many many ppl catch it - but nothing happens - some in poor condition - suffer more .
The death numbers are the only guide - and only as a result of are of interest.
So if nobody in Wales has died from C 19 since Jly why do we have the madness of lockdown!!!!!!!

jl5006
03/10/2020
20:20
I do not care about the death numbers, who kills most, flu or v19..all I care is do not be ME, so I follow the advise and more just to protect myself and my family who by the way do thesame.. protecting each others.
k38
03/10/2020
20:17
Has Barnier been sidelined now Von Leyen fronting up with Merkel lurking in the background. Don't fall for her charm Boris. No deal.
cheshire pete
03/10/2020
19:57
First time I went to Wales, I was told that if you can see the hills, it's going to rain; and if you can't see them, it's raining.
poikka
03/10/2020
19:28
And it is still raining in Wales.But more importantly.No DealWTO
xxxxxy
Chat Pages: Latest  13143  13142  13141  13140  13139  13138  13137  13136  13135  13134  13133  13132  Older