Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[action] 26/6/2020 09:50

Peak over the pond.

[action] 26/6/2020 09:49

Banks came down appx 19% from their pack reached on 5th June Over the pond. I will be buyer of banks in USA if it reaches recent lows in may.

[chavitravi2] 26/6/2020 09:42

Action, not to worry they will thrash out a deal, neither want no deal it's just a question of us getting a fair deal and leaving the threat of no deal.

[action] 26/6/2020 09:17

If no deal on BREXIT this will touch new low ..we are coming near to day of reckoning in week or so.

[mikemichael2] 26/6/2020 09:07

The sooner they get the safe 'corridors' open to Spain the better, ship them all out to Benidorm and Torremolinos.

[diku] 26/6/2020 08:45

Now the clean up begins on the beach...with all those plastics and take away food boxes...how many of those got paid to stay home?...

[geckotheglorious] 26/6/2020 08:41

Anyone still want to "be like Sweden"

Top countries over 10 million with the highest #COVID19 mortality rate (with epidemic duration over 100 days).

#1-3: Chile, Mexico, Peru, Brazil.

...and then: SWEDEN, yes, Sweden 🇸🇪! Hard to believe but it is indeed true

[mikemichael2] 26/6/2020 08:39

Oooo, controversial Grahamite, they are thick, low life putting others at unnecessary risk.

[careful] 26/6/2020 08:39

Seeing all of those Brexiteers packed together on the beach at Bournemouth.
It makes me worry about democracy.
They each have a vote.

[grahamite2] 26/6/2020 08:36

They are true born English men and women exercising their right to individual liberty. Good for them.

[arjun] 26/6/2020 08:33

Morning allBuybacks and divi frozen over the pond, after hours all the banks went south!

[mikemichael2] 26/6/2020 08:25

I'd send up a 'crop sprayer' and give them all a dose of sanitizer.

[maxk] 26/6/2020 08:16

Besides, they are bored and have nothing else to do.

[geckotheglorious] 26/6/2020 08:14

Mike,

True,many will be young , selfish and thick, but being on the beach in the sun is far safer than hitting a supermarket and not wearing a mask..

[mikemichael2] 26/6/2020 08:09

Those people on the beaches represent a large example of our population, young,selfish and thick..........we're doomed.

[bearnecessities] 26/6/2020 08:08

Normal service resumes. Ftse up well and we are already pushed down below the open.Nice balanced market I see.....

[joe say] 26/6/2020 08:01

Get real - they'll spout left wing rubbish wherever they are

[xxxxxy] 26/6/2020 08:01

Planning a brighter future
By JOHNREDWOOD | Published: JUNE 25, 2020
Yesterday the Commons debated our planning system. At issue was the granting of permission to build new homes in Westferry, London, where they are much needed. Tower Hamlets Council failed to provide an answer on the planning application within the quite generous time limits laid down, so the decision fell to be made by the incoming new Secretary of State for the Environment. Opposition parties did not like the way he made it, and or did not like the decision.

Most people in the UK think there should be a planning system, but many disagree with whatever system is in place, particularly when it results in a decision they do not like. There are many people with land who would like to make a big profit by putting it forward for development, who find their land is not preferred. There are many others, often their neighbours, who think their local area has enough development and do not wish to see green fields built on or old buildings replaced by much larger developments . The tensions are understandable. The task for government trying to judge between the competing views is uncomfortable.

The aim of planning policy is to provide some intelligent framework for these decisions, setting out in advance through local plans where development is likely and where it is not. Years ago the system revolved around a fairly simply local map. The map would show through hatched markings which places were to be kept as green openspace and farmland, which remained as built up area and which parts could be used for new building. The built up areas could also gain special protections through area designation as a conservation area, or from individual building listings.

Over the years I have been watching planning it has got a lot more complicated, with local plans now going into huge detail and containing many subsidiary policies about permitted development. I am not sure this added complexity has produced better results or has been any better at allaying tensions over decisions. One of the worst features in my area has been from a landowner or developer gaming the system. They fail to build out the agreed permissions for new homes, whilst putting in for more permissions in close by locations,. It can be more profitable to trade planning permissions than to actually build and sell the homes. This undermines public confidence in the system. It can also lead to bad planning, with too many homes on floodplains or stretching local services too thinly.

[geckotheglorious] 26/6/2020 07:11

Graham,

Post 308409

Doubt Minerve works for the BBC.Even they do some work rather than sitting on a BB 24/7 spouting off Left wing rubbish.

[geckotheglorious] 26/6/2020 07:09

Daddywarbucks.

I'd say the majority of them..But the beach in the sun is probably one of the safest places to be.

Concur though. All about rights, and not responsibilities these days. That is why we have so many societal problems. People's Entitlement

Hard times are coming.

Sorely needed to knock some sense into overly entitled people.

They are in for a shock. Unfortunately rest of us will suffer for their lack of moral values and absence of personal responsibility as well...

[grahamite2] 25/6/2020 23:47

Far right = anyone who isn't a card carrying member of the Communist Party.

Minerve probably works for the BBC.

[maxk] 25/6/2020 23:33

You gone orff Bekaa now Min?