ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

56.18
-0.02 (-0.04%)
21 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.02 -0.04% 56.18 55.94 55.98 56.30 55.80 55.98 221,233,921 16:35:30
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.51 35.57B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 56.20p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 56.30p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £35.57 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.51.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 318701 to 318718 of 427275 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  12759  12758  12757  12756  12755  12754  12753  12752  12751  12750  12749  12748  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/6/2020
12:25
bbalanjones
I think that if by 65 years of age you have an unblemished record you should be deported from this increasing hell hole as a reward. At the moment it seems that landing on our shores is being used as a punishment for foreign criminals

scruff1
25/6/2020
11:35
Brixton: 22 officers injured and police cars smashed after street party




Don't worry the Mayor is on the case.


Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said: "I'm in touch with the Met about the completely unacceptable events in Brixton overnight.

"Violence against the police will not be tolerated. Large gatherings during COVID-19 are deeply irresponsible and risk others' lives."


Nothing to see move along.

freddie01
25/6/2020
11:25
I see all the Councils are running out of money, they could do with a good culling, all i seem to get for my never ending rate rise is my bins emptied.
mikemichael2
25/6/2020
11:18
mm2 ps - other indoctrination systems are available!! lol
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:56
g2: On Punishment I agree we have become too lenient. We have all just gone through 3+ months of different varieties of "Solitary Confinement" without the predicted mass harm. IMV ALL prison sentences should be just that - might even bring the re-offending rate down.
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:52
I said nothing about religious observances.

As to transportation beyond the seas, there are an awful lot of countries far worse than Australia ever was!

grahamite2
25/6/2020
10:51
Mike,

They aren't guessing though..
Antibody levels of Covid-19 patients decline quickly, small study shows..

Positive is it's a small study so might not be representative.

But there is some evidence.

geckotheglorious
25/6/2020
10:49
g2 : So it's Hang 'n Flog 'n Praise the Lord? Where can we Transport for Life to these days?
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:45
bbalanjones, it goes without saying that we should bring back hanging. It is grossly immoral that murderers are allowed to get away with it.

As to traditional policemen...just say that nobody with a sociology degree will be considered, that would be a good start.

grahamite2
25/6/2020
10:43
5xy: Shout back at your mate John Redwood regarding local planning laws " WTF happened with "GRENFELL."
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:43
Geck, they just don't know yet, no point guessing.
mikemichael2
25/6/2020
10:38
mm2 Nobody knows that yet, either way, that is the trouble in developing an effective antibody test.
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:34
Planning a brighter future
By JOHNREDWOOD | Published: JUNE 25, 2020
Yesterday the Commons debated our planning system. At issue was the granting of permission to build new homes in Westferry, London, where they are much needed. Tower Hamlets Council failed to provide an answer on the planning application within the quite generous time limits laid down, so the decision fell to be made by the incoming new Secretary of State for the Environment. Opposition parties did not like the way he made it, and or did not like the decision.

Most people in the UK think there should be a planning system, but many disagree with whatever system is in place, particularly when it results in a decision they do not like. There are many people with land who would like to make a big profit by putting it forward for development, who find their land is not preferred. There are many others, often their neighbours, who think their local area has enough development and do not wish to see green fields built on or old buildings replaced by much larger developments . The tensions are understandable. The task for government trying to judge between the competing views is uncomfortable.

The aim of planning policy is to provide some intelligent framework for these decisions, setting out in advance through local plans where development is likely and where it is not. Years ago the system revolved around a fairly simply local map. The map would show through hatched markings which places were to be kept as green openspace and farmland, which remained as built up area and which parts could be used for new building. The built up areas could also gain special protections through area designation as a conservation area, or from individual building listings.

Over the years I have been watching planning it has got a lot more complicated, with local plans now going into huge detail and containing many subsidiary policies about permitted development. I am not sure this added complexity has produced better results or has been any better at allaying tensions over decisions. One of the worst features in my area has been from a landowner or developer gaming the system. They fail to build out the agreed permissions for new homes, whilst putting in for more permissions in close by locations,. It can be more profitable to trade planning permissions than to actually build and sell the homes. This undermines public confidence in the system. It can also lead to bad planning, with too many homes on floodplains or stretching local services too thinly.

xxxxxy
25/6/2020
10:34
Buywell, a proper doom and gloom merchant. There is NO evidence yet that you do not have immunity after having the virus. You are just 'twisting' jurnalistic hype.
mikemichael2
25/6/2020
10:26
g2: ha! 'Traditional' is a very broad term in the language of Law Enforcement! How about hanging? We have walked blindfolded into the ever polarised land of "Left and Right", such that neither seems to be spoken of except in varieties of hate speech - where is our "Old English" sense of moderation? (Sotto Voce - I blame Brexit! lol)
bbalanjones
25/6/2020
10:23
I see the council of Bournemouth complaining about people on the beach can't remember complaining about BLM protests on the streets.It seems we only want you here when we want your money on our terms.
pooroldboy55
25/6/2020
09:50
Looks like the police forgot to bend their knees last night. They must have been impolite when asking the revellers to leave. Maybe they will have more luck when arresting some old guy in his local boozer from speaking to loudly or sitting with three of his mates instead of two. Maybe theresa may was right. Is there much point to an increasingly useless 'force'
scruff1
25/6/2020
09:48
8 Billion people to be given the vaccine every 100 days

For ever

amen

The papers should run with this one ---- they have been lax
As has the BBC

buywell3
Chat Pages: Latest  12759  12758  12757  12756  12755  12754  12753  12752  12751  12750  12749  12748  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock