ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

54.92
0.38 (0.70%)
Last Updated: 14:30:54
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.38 0.70% 54.92 54.90 54.94 55.12 54.42 55.06 33,833,084 14:30:54
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.39 34.91B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 54.54p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 57.22p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £34.91 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.39.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 331926 to 331944 of 428925 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  13281  13280  13279  13278  13277  13276  13275  13274  13273  13272  13271  13270  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/11/2020
16:42
Poor minnie lol..don't start to celebrate too early just in case or you disappointed for a second time.
k38
03/11/2020
16:42
Whatever the outcome it will lift one unknown and that is positive (for how long I don't know).
alphorn
03/11/2020
16:39
M2If you vote just to replace a "loser" with another bigger loser... so what's the point of voting.
k38
03/11/2020
16:38
Desperate posts from a broken generation.

Bye bye 👋👋

Hell awaits. :)

minerve 2
03/11/2020
16:37
As a simpleton I ask why the R factor is so critical.
The available data only related to what trick and trace manages to identify.
It does not add in a dont know factor.
Is that why scientists were always seen as weirdos - bcos they only saw their world.
What is the point of mass testing Liverpool - bit like lucy in the sky with diamonds - dreaming - and logistically impossible -
what are these ppl?
And should 100% of the ppl test positive - then what/ And the test is 100% correct.
Total and absolute rubbish from the hierarchy of so said our NHS

jl5006
03/11/2020
16:37
k38

So what.

Trump is history just like your ilk.

minerve 2
03/11/2020
16:36
Luckily the world has no say in the matter. But the fellows in Peoria and Abilene do.
grahamite2
03/11/2020
16:35
He may pack his bags but.. The Q is what Biden has to offer to the ordinary Americans and all know the A.. big nothing.
k38
03/11/2020
16:34
The world no longer wants The Twitter Clown.
minerve 2
03/11/2020
16:33
We all want to see Trump win, xxxy! Nigel has put 10 grand on him.
grahamite2
03/11/2020
16:32
But researchers remain concerned that R is looming too large, and is being used

for purposes for which it was never intended. “It’s not yet clear what actions

they are or are not taking on the back of R. But we are concerned because they’re

giving it such prominence,” says Woolhouse.

stonedyou
03/11/2020
16:27
To infectious-disease experts, Johnson’s focus on the reproduction number as a guiding light for policy was worryingly myopic. They worry about placing too much weight on R, the average number of people each person with a disease goes on to infect.

But fascination might have turned into unhealthy political and media fixation, say disease experts. R is an imprecise estimate that rests on assumptions, says Jeremy Rossman, a virologist at the University of Kent, UK. It doesn’t capture the current status of an epidemic and can spike up and down when case numbers are low. It is also an average for a population and therefore can hide local variation. Too much attention to it could obscure the importance of other measures, such as trends in numbers of new infections, deaths and hospital admissions, and cohort surveys to see how many people in a population currently have the disease, or have already had it.

“Epidemiologists are quite keen on downplaying R, but the politicians seem to have embraced it with enthusiasm,” says Mark Woolhouse, an infectious-diseases expert at the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom, who is a member of a modelling group that advises the British government on the pandemic. “We’re concerned that we’ve created a monster. R does not tell us what we need to know to manage this.”

stonedyou
03/11/2020
16:27
No Biden will win the orange man Is packing his trunk
pal44
03/11/2020
16:23
I do hope Trump wins. Fingers and toes crossed.
xxxxxy
03/11/2020
16:14
Yes I know. I just wish I could do something right. These go up and what I have bought into go down, only for now hopefully.
chavitravi2
03/11/2020
16:14
The R-rate in England has fallen to 1, King’s College has said, leading to hopes that a national lockdown can be avoided.



This is getting beyond farcical. Keystone Kops stuff, as someone on the Telegraph comments has said.

grahamite2
03/11/2020
16:14
Might still get a chance to buy in. The presidential election may be contested and the last time that happened mkt had a pretty big downturn.
mo123
03/11/2020
16:09
Can't make it look too easy. GBP perky for some reason; perhaps nobody read that article?
alphorn
03/11/2020
15:54
Glad to see others now question the forecasts of deaths and cases used by the advisers to demand lockdown. Still seeking the figures for NHS hospital bed capacity and to find out why they are not using the Nightingales for CV 19.
xxxxxy
Chat Pages: Latest  13281  13280  13279  13278  13277  13276  13275  13274  13273  13272  13271  13270  Older