ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

IQE Iqe Plc

33.50
1.25 (3.88%)
17 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Iqe Plc LSE:IQE London Ordinary Share GB0009619924 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  1.25 3.88% 33.50 33.25 33.75 34.25 32.35 33.25 2,690,624 16:35:07
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Electronic Components, Nec 115.3M -29.4M -0.0306 -10.88 320.18M
Iqe Plc is listed in the Electronic Components sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IQE. The last closing price for Iqe was 32.25p. Over the last year, Iqe shares have traded in a share price range of 12.32p to 34.25p.

Iqe currently has 961,504,577 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Iqe is £320.18 million. Iqe has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -10.88.

Iqe Share Discussion Threads

Showing 37526 to 37546 of 70800 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1512  1511  1510  1509  1508  1507  1506  1505  1504  1503  1502  1501  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/10/2017
16:42
Must be shorters closing! :-D
sheep_herder
19/10/2017
16:35
That chart is looking really sweet.
grabster
19/10/2017
16:26
nice late rise, news coming?
davemac3
19/10/2017
15:37
Wattene - highlighting the large price movements in the first hour or two.
skinny
19/10/2017
15:11
Anything of not today - I have filtered most of the posters :)
toffeeman
19/10/2017
14:27
Several posters now filtered for clogging this thread with non-IQE stuff.
grabster
19/10/2017
14:21
I had to double check that I was reading the IQE board earlier!! lol
suejarvie
19/10/2017
13:44
Could someone please direct me to the discussion board on IQE?
steptoes yard
19/10/2017
13:27
Agreed, I've no doubt thats exactly how it was intended, purely semantics. Unfortunately I'm only too aware of how carefully statements are scripted when it comes to NI politics and terminology seems to play a bigger part than substance to the detriment of the people of Northern Ireland.
scullyp1
19/10/2017
13:16
fair point scullyp. Although Northern Irish Republicans could just mean Republicans from the north of Ireland.
volsung
19/10/2017
13:12
Scullyp1, filtered.
sheep_herder
19/10/2017
12:55
Netcurtains, nothing rude about it. Your post 7836 was clearly ambiguous, unfortunately I took it as you showing personal deprecation but in actual fact it was you being literal. On that basis I thought we were both singing from the same hymn sheet, clearly not, though I contend that it was not a 'lie' but rather an assumption based on your ambiguous statement (my bad!). As you made a further statement about noise, answers and corrections I shall try to provide you with a few though with full acknowledgement that you haven't specifically asked for such, but hey-ho once on a round-about you've just got to keep going until you find a suitable exit.Your post 7820 states that "Ireland has on average 2 petitions A YEAR". Given you then went on to discuss a public forum for initiating petitions on subjects that may of concern to the creator (post 7821), Ireland from that perspective could have zero to x thousand petitions per year. Where do you pluck the figure of 2 from? If I may be so bold to assume that you are in fact referring to referenda then that may form the basis of my comment on your poor choice of terminology. You seem to infer that Ireland has some sort of referendum infatuation, whereas it is more of a case of a current generation of forward thinking politicians using that particular public participation method to rectify some of the more backward facing polices of the past. To further infer that the number of referendums a country has in any particular year is directly correlated with causation to their GDP, well, words fail me.However, what was worse was the inference in post 7821 that the weirdest thing about the map was "So few Northern Irish republicans have signed it". How do you identify that those who have signed the petition in Northern Ireland are 'Northern Irish republicans'? There is nothing within the figures to suggest the political affiliation of those who have signed the petition. They could very well be equally unionist, loyalist or nationalist as well as 'Northern Irish republican'. The £1 billion bung to the DUP for their support in a fragile Tory government has slowly become irrelevant to the people of Northern Ireland. The figure could be 1 billion, 10 billion or 1 trillion, as without a functioning assembly to use such funds it sits in treasury coffers until the petty squabbles have been settled. The actual 'bung' itself was opposed by the republican party in the north of Ireland (SF) due to the nature of the agreement between a Tory party and the DUP to which SF are ideologically opposed. You may wish to note that the current political petty squabbles in the north are directly between SF and the DUP, with the Tory Secretary of State for NI chairing the discussions. That may enlighten you to the SF discomfort at the hand-holding between the DUP and Conservativeparty and their opposition to the 'bung' agreed between the DUP and Conservative party. However, that's not to say that any political party would be unhappy at more money to help alleviate the pressure on public services for their constituents, to contend otherwise would be naïve no matter what the public utterings.  Lastly, I would contend that any 'republican' would take umbrage at the statement "Northern Irish republicans" as they may consider themselves to be 'Irish republicans' given they do not recognise the term Northern Ireland but then that's just getting into semantics.We are in agreement on one thing though, this should certainly go back to discussions on IQE. I do not intend to engage in anything other than that on this forum from this point forward, my time is too valuable for misdirection on other topics. I respectfully suggest that you should DYOR on all topics you drop into your comments before making the comment as it just encourages the filter button being used rather than interesting engagement being taken on your posts.Regards.
scullyp1
19/10/2017
12:09
Rathean:

I think you will find you close a short by buying.

bocase
19/10/2017
12:06
For shorts to be closing they would need to be buys.
joeall
19/10/2017
12:02
Big sells coming through, short closing?
rathean
19/10/2017
11:45
Scullyp1: No so the reverse is normal practice. those that do not know make the noise and those that do know provide them with answers and corrections not rudeness. you clearly are a rude person and a bit of a liar ("we are agreed" is a lie).

In future do not correspond with me unless its about IQE.
Thank you for your cooperation.

netcurtains
19/10/2017
11:23
Then we are agreed that you should maybe refrain from spurious comments and reasoning resulting in nonsense.
scullyp1
19/10/2017
11:03
skinny: Nice chart, but can you tell me what the red circles signify?
wattene
19/10/2017
10:54
Can we get back to talking about the short positions please.
sheep_herder
19/10/2017
10:53
Scullyp1: Now please tell me something I dont know...
netcurtains
19/10/2017
10:34
Netcurtains - 7820 & 7821. You are clearly ignorant of the terminology you are using and N.I. politics and demographics.
scullyp1
Chat Pages: Latest  1512  1511  1510  1509  1508  1507  1506  1505  1504  1503  1502  1501  Older