ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

IMB Imperial Brands Plc

1,873.50
1.50 (0.08%)
Last Updated: 13:22:52
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Imperial Brands Plc LSE:IMB London Ordinary Share GB0004544929 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  1.50 0.08% 1,873.50 1,873.00 1,873.50 1,882.50 1,868.00 1,873.50 619,553 13:22:52
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Cigarettes 32.48B 2.33B 2.6392 7.10 16.53B
Imperial Brands Plc is listed in the Cigarettes sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IMB. The last closing price for Imperial Brands was 1,872p. Over the last year, Imperial Brands shares have traded in a share price range of 1,553.50p to 1,951.50p.

Imperial Brands currently has 882,089,213 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Imperial Brands is £16.53 billion. Imperial Brands has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 7.10.

Imperial Brands Share Discussion Threads

Showing 4526 to 4545 of 8675 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  191  190  189  188  187  186  185  184  183  182  181  180  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/3/2020
13:18
Minerve......no sorry. It was copied and pasted from a comment in a publication somewhere . Trouble is i've forgotten which exactly as i go incognito in my browsing and lost track of where as its info overload on the Corona Virus at the moment in just about every web site visited.
If i come across it again i'll post it here.
Regards

pineapple1
23/3/2020
13:05
pineapple1

Can you provide a link to that article please.

Thanks in advance. :)

minerve 2
23/3/2020
12:43
"One of the press releases of the European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, which presents the results of a study of 140 patients infected with coronavirus, contains unexpected data. ... the most striking thing is that the virus infects almost exclusively non-smokers! Among the diseased, only 1.4% smoked, while the percentage of active smokers in China is 27.3%! ”

Perhaps a tarred/smoked lung doesn't make a happy environment for the virus to thrive?

minerve 2
22/3/2020
13:42
One of the press releases of the European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, which presents the results of a study of 140 patients infected with coronavirus, contains unexpected data. ... the most striking thing is that the virus infects almost exclusively non-smokers! Among the diseased, only 1.4% smoked, while the percentage of active smokers in China is 27.3%! ”

Can't vouch for this. If true it should encourage people to start smoking again.......lol

pineapple1
22/3/2020
13:04
More people likely to die from stress than corona, & smokers will experience less stress, imo.
eeza
22/3/2020
11:44
Old news. First hit in Feb. Basically those that smoke generally have worse respiratory systems than those that don't. Fairly obvious I would have thought. spud
spud
22/3/2020
10:49
Just watching Sky news and saying that there is a link between smoking and catching the most serious form of Coronavirus.....
sonofbanjosinger
21/3/2020
20:29
Great value and dividend:

Imperial Brands (IMP)
Market cap: £13.0 billion

Forward yield: 15%

hxxps://www.imperialbrandsplc.com/

Imperial published a gloomy profit warning on February 5th, in which it warned that its next-generation products (NGPs) were struggling. The subsequent equity market panic has seen its shares slide by a further 25%.

NGPs are the new forms of tobacco or nicotine consumption: vaping, heated tobacco and oral nicotine.

One of the big problems for Imperial is that its flagship vaping brand blu was marketed in the United States with flavours like “Strawberry Mint”, “Peach Passion”, “Mint Chocolate” and “Cherry Swirl”.

But the US Food & Drug Administration has targeted vape flavours which it thinks are targeted at children, and Imperial was forced to write down the value of its flavoured inventory which could no longer be sold.

News reports of lung injuries associated with vaping may have also played a role in weakening demand (although “illicit”; vaping products, rather than blu, may be responsible for the majority of such injuries).

There may also be some brand-specific problems with blu and certain other parts of the Imperial portfolio. The result is that Imperial’s net revenue from NGPs is set to be “significantly lower” this year.

By contrast, Imperial’s core tobacco brands remain very powerful and had a good start to 2020. Revenue generation and market share from tobacco remain very resilient.

I must admit that I don’t understand why the market is quite so bearish on tobacco shares and has put them at these extraordinarily cheap levels.

Indeed, for a couple of years now, I’ve been holding British American Tobacco (LON:BATS), and scratching my head as to why it remains so cheap.

Imperial is even cheaper than BATS, and one of the reasons seems to be its weak position in e-cigarettes.

No discussion of Imperial would be complete without mentioning its significant net debt position: £12 billion. But unlike Evraz, it is investment-grade – each of the agencies gives it a weak investment-grade rating.

Stockopedia classifies Imperial as a Value Trap. While it’s not my top pick in the tobacco space, I do think it should provide plenty more puffs for its shareholders, even if forced to rely purely on its core tobacco brands. Dividend cover is forecast to be 1.3x, implying that it has some wiggle room to afford the planned pay-out this year.

creditcrunchies
21/3/2020
16:44
me, im thinking of starting
vickiitwo2
21/3/2020
06:15
When this virus has run its course will there be any smokers left?
kiwi2007
21/3/2020
01:21
Perhaps when I said “just think of the dividend” I should of said “please consider the current dividend yield for those of us who are fortunate to have purchased at the recent share price” hope that doesn’t offend and good luck to all.
lendmeafiver
20/3/2020
23:20
Institutions hold the voting power, & in essence they couldn't care less because they are using OPM. But, even they are only invested in IMB & BATS for the income so the new CEO will need to be cognisant of that fact.
Cut the dividend & his own throat at the same time.
Dividend should only be cut if the FCF doesn't support it.
There is nothing high tech here. All that is required is to manufacture the goods and get them to the POS. It is a cash cow.

eeza
20/3/2020
20:51
Just think of the dividend
lendmeafiver
20/3/2020
20:39
They sneeze & we catch the cold..spud
spud
20/3/2020
20:22
wow wall street got smashed- could get ugly on monday
dmore2
20/3/2020
06:53
Or they've moved onto somewhere where the only smoking is when you're scorched by the fires of Hades. Selling to addicts would be easier if the product didn't cull the customer base. Creating new addicts comes with the promise of a free trip to join smokers in those fires. It's a hell of a business.
hydrogen economy
19/3/2020
22:32
they must have moved on to the harder stuff looking how drug addiction is going parabolic :-)
creditcrunchies
19/3/2020
17:19
I guess it must be hard because consumption is falling
zicopele
19/3/2020
15:44
Well how hard is it to sell an addictive product to an addict.

Although outside Cooper's competence.

The Peter principle in its full glory.

eeza
19/3/2020
15:36
wskill - If he cuts the dividend you will be rewarded with a sub 10 quid share price (if your lucky). Thank goodness you weren't considered for the position...

spud

spud
Chat Pages: Latest  191  190  189  188  187  186  185  184  183  182  181  180  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock