ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

IMM Immupharma Plc

1.15
-0.005 (-0.43%)
13 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Immupharma Plc LSE:IMM London Ordinary Share GB0033711010 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.005 -0.43% 1.15 1.02 1.255 1.27 1.27 1.27 733,994 16:35:03
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Finance Services 0 -2.92M -0.0070 -1.81 4.81M
Immupharma Plc is listed in the Finance Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IMM. The last closing price for Immupharma was 1.16p. Over the last year, Immupharma shares have traded in a share price range of 0.83p to 2.90p.

Immupharma currently has 416,440,000 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Immupharma is £4.81 million. Immupharma has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.81.

Immupharma Share Discussion Threads

Showing 38876 to 38899 of 39200 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1556  1555  1554  1553  1552  1551  1550  1549  1548  1547  1546  1545  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/12/2022
19:21
Eva Perone - I fear your destiny is less pharma. More the cappuccino maker.
lord loads of lolly
19/12/2022
19:19
Me too eva... hope you still have hammersmith xxx
halfbutt
19/12/2022
10:14
Booked decent loss

Heartbreaking but I'm now done with IMM.

Onto Destiny Pharma now

eva1989
17/12/2022
13:05
You are maybe confusing me with Arlington Chetwynd Talbot - we are different people.
arlington chetwynd talbott
17/12/2022
12:39
ACT ru the reAlOne orA clone??
andymunchkin
17/12/2022
12:34
You may be right, but you seem to say that about every share.
arlington chetwynd talbott
16/12/2022
22:42
Well another placing coming?
neo26
16/12/2022
16:15
Timberrrrrrrrr!Lemmings and mushrooms only!
ken chung
16/12/2022
11:12
What is imm actually doing now?
neo26
24/11/2022
16:36
Interesting development in lupus treatment:



CAR T cell therapy could reach beyond cancer
by Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

Engineered immune cells, known as CAR T cells, have shown the world what personalized immunotherapies can do to fight blood cancers. Now, investigators have reported highly promising early results for CAR T therapy in a small set of patients with the autoimmune disease lupus. Penn Medicine CAR T pioneer Carl June, MD, and Daniel Baker, a doctoral student in Cell and Molecular Biology in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, discuss this development in a commentary published today in Cell.

[ ... ]

The commentary from June and Baker comes in response to the first significant clinical report of success from these efforts: a paper in Nature Medicine from German researchers on the use of CAR T therapy against the autoimmune disease lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus).

Researchers say lupus is an obvious choice for CAR T therapy because it too is driven by B cells, and thus experimental CAR T therapies against it can employ existing anti-B-cell designs. B cells are the immune system's antibody-producing cells, and, in lupus, B cells arise that attack the patient's own organs and tissues.

In the German study, the patients—five young adults—did not benefit from standard lupus treatments. Yet, all went into remission, and were able to stop taking their lupus drugs within three months of a single, relatively small dose of CAR T therapy, which essentially removed their existing B cells. (Cancer patients subsequently require infusions of purified human antibodies from healthy volunteers, to maintain some antibody immunity.)

Even more remarkably, all the patients remained in remission during the follow-up period of up to a year, and unlike cancer patients, the lupus patients experienced the return of their B cells, which are naturally replenished from blood stem cells in bone marrow.

[ ... ]

supernumerary
24/11/2022
11:06
Just spotted that stanford have issued an updated research
note this morning can be seen on their website,also on research tree
if you use that.

victor2
14/11/2022
18:32
Its true he did say that in interview. Now we know why all those warrants price reduced to 5p, they expected this but mislead investors.
neo26
11/11/2022
17:13
Good point neo! It’s shocking really…
nobbygnome
11/11/2022
14:15
He mislead us the ceo he said phase 3 was already agreed to last year..
neo26
11/11/2022
13:12
Nobby - I agree TM has told a lot less than the whole truth. Now find me an AIM CEO of whom that could not be said. Even the saints and sirs, as you know, can bend or avoid the facts to suit their own purposes :¬(

All that said, it will be interesting to see the outcome of the trials, and finally find out for sure whether there is a significant dose-related effect.

supernumerary
11/11/2022
12:45
OCTP are the place to be, with Phase 1 starting in January and results due in April. Easy 10x bagger.
tell sid
11/11/2022
11:12
I have been critical of Muller in the past. The science was contradictory and muddled and she completely changed her mind about the site of action. This was a critical part of determining the necessary drug level in vivo to see activity so directly lead to the current issue IMHO.

So SN yes I agree with you to some extent although there is no doubt McCarthy has been economical with the truth all the way through. I still remember him saying in an interview after the phase III results that the trial showed Lupuzor worked. It was a gobsmacking statement because it was the exact opposite of the truth!

nobbygnome
11/11/2022
11:07
Easy to criticise McCarthy, but if the prize-winning scientist at the centre of all this had done her job as well as he's done his, they wouldn't be in anything like the mess they're currently in. Just saying.
supernumerary
11/11/2022
10:25
I would say "precise but vague" is what the company are saying; and what does the distribution agreement mean? IMM aren't in to that market are they? Anyhow its clear Avion saw an opportunity to get more than the US rights, whatever it is they wanted. Maybe the good news is that Avion see a future for Lupuzor but at what cost to IMM? Anyhow its impossible to determine precisely what the new test is and speculation is pointless until the cloud clears.

Whoever is pulling the strings at the FDA they certainly got it delayed, unlike Covid stuff - seems some stuff gets tested to detail and other stuff is waved through. Perhaps IMM should have sold rights to GSK or some other deal with a big pharma!

colsmith
11/11/2022
08:02
Oh dear not so good then?
I wouldn't touch anything Tim Mc was involved in after AZM debacle. I thought maybe he had turned a corner....

dunderheed
11/11/2022
07:49
>> waterloo

Yes why would Avion let a company with no sales experience market their drugs. It makes no sense….

nobbygnome
11/11/2022
07:47
As expected, oh dear. As for the distribution agreement...... really.
waterloo01
11/11/2022
07:45
RNS sounds reasonably positive?
dunderheed
11/11/2022
07:41
>> s_k

It’s a tragedy what has happened here because of something so obvious. McCarthy was involved all the way through so should shoulder a lot of the blame

nobbygnome
Chat Pages: Latest  1556  1555  1554  1553  1552  1551  1550  1549  1548  1547  1546  1545  Older