Griffin Mining Share Discussion Threads

[alangriffbang] 13/5/2024 09:27

zoo here they all are on there Monday shifts what a waste of space they all are ,nothing much going on on the shares ,very breezy out there ,good luck,

[theapiarist] 13/5/2024 09:04

Reduced my holding by a further 50,000 @ av. 152.90

[up just a little bit] 13/5/2024 08:46

Zoo and Alan, caught yet again. The vitriolic fool lambasted by sage and the liar who can't stop ticking.

[rose_by_another_name] 13/5/2024 08:24

Sage doesn't need an interpreter, zoo. Your need is
transparent. I don't think you can keep him "on side"
by re-imagining his recent discussions. And maybe
tell alan to stop ticking him down.

[zooman] 13/5/2024 08:15

Alan, the four of them are so toxic its unbelievable, it's passed being funny they're sick sad people. If "THE" isn't Rose then it's very sad that a 79 year old man who should be enjoying his life and family carries on as he does on a faceless BB. Sage I imagine realised long ago what the reality is there with the four of them and has tried not to fully engage with them. .Zoo

[tygwyg] 13/5/2024 08:12

"mining licence will be renewed when renewal is required and not before".Is this a quote from the company?."Mining right...........To continue the mining operation after expiry of the licence term, the licence holder should apply to the registration agency for an extension, no later than 30 days prior to expiry of the term of the licence."https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=15dc85b9-c112-484c-b8fd-6e26002214aa."As you know, the licence only runs for a further 13 years".Not correct.The only thing with 13yrs left to run is the JV term... and this remaining term will become irrelevant following incorporation of the JV this year..Are you confusing JV terms and mining licence terms?.."the bureaucratic process in China proceeds at a glacial pace"For new or variation of a mining licence yes, but not for renewal of existing.

[up just a little bit] 13/5/2024 07:24

Alan, why do you tell so many lies?

[alangriffbang] 13/5/2024 07:05

zoo good morning weather looks on the turn now, Perseus down a tad , I see it finished up with the muck last night what a shower they are four people that I would never miss ,I’ve a feeling the market will backtrack this week it’s very high ,no idea what gold will do ,I’ve never seen sage so angry and quite right to be ,he answers all there questions politely I hope he doesn’t stop posting ,I go for my covid jab lunchtime today I understand it Moderna ,you have a good day I’ve said my goodbyes to my friends they had a very good weekend ,good luck,

[up just a little bit] 12/5/2024 23:51

Alan, you are a total liar. ADVFN have NOT told you that there are multiple aliases you are well aware of that. You have been called out for telling lies about a company listed on the London Stock Exchange.

[phillis] 12/5/2024 22:39

Alan is the only red ticker
That is widely known
He follows me everywhere

[rose_by_another_name] 12/5/2024 22:18

ADVFN said no such thing. All he has to do is post their email,
but he won't, because that isn't what they said.

[alangriffbang] 12/5/2024 21:41

sage good evening I’ve had a long but very enjoyable day they are all going back to London tomorrow ,I’ve seen your posts about the ticks it’s not new to me because I've suffered it for a very long time ,you can’t really tell who does it all we know is it’s one out of four, I have reported it to ADVFN on several occasions and I’ve only been told that they have multiple accounts and that’s it ,I was told not to take it seriously but it’s hard when one of them posts then suddenly there are four or five tick up ,they are not so old as me but they are wasting there lives ,I cannot understand rose and phillis keep bellyaching about dividends they are both supposed to be well off ,off to bed soon I’m very tired ,good luck and please don’t stop posting,

[theapiarist] 12/5/2024 20:53

Well, that was a bit of a conversation stopper!

[sageman] 12/5/2024 18:28

😂😁😂😁8514;🤣ԍ15;😂

You couldn’t make it up. What a plonker!

[sageman] 12/5/2024 17:35

lol 😂

[up just a little bit] 12/5/2024 17:10

Sageman you have to love Alan. As long as you understand his foolhardy ways. He has been ticking down my news links to the Chinese metal markets and zinc forecasts for a long time now. I'd get over it as he's just an old fool.

[sageman] 12/5/2024 17:06

Specifically to red flag moron. When was the very 1st time that you realised that you have manure between your ears?

[sageman] 12/5/2024 17:04

Love the down red flag . What a moron!

[rose_by_another_name] 12/5/2024 15:34

If you believe they are ineffective at supporting the SP,
as I do, then they are at least a waste of funds that
would be more effective distributed as dividends. That's
quite aside from any suspicion that the board are using
them in their own interests rather than ours.

[theapiarist] 12/5/2024 12:13

Ringo.

They may be viewed as negative by the ordinary shareholder if the mandate includes the proviso that the 10 million shares can be purchased from directors and their buddies.

History then shows that they declined to buy stock at 100p, preferring to spend 150p.

Or am I being cynical?

I should add in the board's defence that the few shares purchased thus far do not appear to have been bought from directors. But watch this space.

[phillis] 12/5/2024 11:52

Surely the debate re buybacks should also include Panmure mandate
Why buy at 150p when many more could have no been bought at £1

Were there no sellers then?
Shouldn’t they have been in the market buying more and pushing up the price?