ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

FDBK Feedback Plc

80.00
-2.50 (-3.03%)
10 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Feedback Plc LSE:FDBK London Ordinary Share GB00BJN59X09 ORD 50P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -2.50 -3.03% 80.00 75.00 85.00 82.50 80.00 82.50 12,708 10:27:36
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Electronic Computers 1.03M -2.92M -0.2188 -3.66 10.67M
Feedback Plc is listed in the Electronic Computers sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker FDBK. The last closing price for Feedback was 82.50p. Over the last year, Feedback shares have traded in a share price range of 58.00p to 150.00p.

Feedback currently has 13,334,659 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Feedback is £10.67 million. Feedback has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -3.66.

Feedback Share Discussion Threads

Showing 12726 to 12749 of 14825 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  521  520  519  518  517  516  515  514  513  512  511  510  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
12/12/2021
15:50
Thanks LR2. All the best.
chopper harris1
12/12/2021
15:38
Chopper, I also wish you well. I had low level health problems for 4 months following my first jab and haven't participated in any jabs since. When you've been ill for 4 months you aren't keen to experience it again.
lr2
12/12/2021
15:30
Thank you.
chopper harris1
12/12/2021
15:28
Chopper, I do hope you get sorted. I am absolutely fine to date after booster jab.
Pete, I am not into soccer at all so have no idea what you are alluding to 😏

ducatiman
12/12/2021
13:49
Each to their own, ducatiman.

I’ve declined my “booster”;. I’m still suffering from this bloody double-vision which occurred shortly after my first Covid jab. Have another appointment at Addenbrookes tomorrow. Have to say that after the uselessness of my GP in the immediate aftermath of my problem, and since having no other option than to present myself at A&E at Addenbrookes to kick-start the process, the Eye Clinic at the hospital have been excellent.

To balance things out: my wife rabidly disagrees with my Covid and vaccine scepticism. But here’s the on-topic bit:
She is an administrator at Royal Papworth and has worked there throughout the period which saw them move from their previous location near Huntingdon to the brand new premises adjacent to Addenbrookes.

She has close dealings with the medical staff, particularly with the regular stream of doctors who pass through the system there (admittedly to mainly do with their personal administration) and over time she has developed a reasonable, although far from complete, knowledge of their working practices within the hospital. But during all this time she has never heard any mention of Bleepa.

Take from that what you will. I have no reason to deramp as I have a holding in FDBK now worth several grand and which I’m roughly 35% underwater on.

chopper harris1
12/12/2021
13:06
loosly related infoLessons to be learned' for NHS following PAC report into digital challenges.https://www.digitalhealth.net/2021/12/lessons-to-be-learned-pac-report/
ragnarr
12/12/2021
10:53
Just thought I would let everyone know that I had my Pfizer booster jab this morning. In keeping with the theme currently on this thread.
ducatiman
10/12/2021
16:12
Yep, my hat is still waiting to be eaten if Oldham do not use Bleepa.
With over 40 centres due to be opened by March, we need Tom to get some exposure out.

petekand
10/12/2021
16:10
You'd expect Bleepa to be a part of that.
ged5
10/12/2021
16:04
Sorry - too caught up in all the nonsense and needed to try and move things on.How about this..https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/news/19773058.royton-medical-diagnostics-centre-plans-approved/
ragnarr
10/12/2021
16:04
Please keep up with this board Rag.
petekand
10/12/2021
16:03
You've done it again Ragnarr.

Post 9245.

ged5
10/12/2021
15:58
Actually on topic :-)https://htn.co.uk/htn-now-focus/
ragnarr
10/12/2021
15:54
Rag,
I do realise this is not something anyone wants to hear but I am not going to be silenced when I am incorrectly labelled a twisted conspiracy theorist or referred to as ‘you lot’ and anti science.
I said last year this is not about the virus but a far sinister and dangerous agenda is in play here but some are too blinkered to see what is staring them in the face.
Come on Tom, give us something to discuss about Bleepa.

petekand
10/12/2021
15:39
This is all too much for me. I'm giving up posting.
lr2
10/12/2021
15:30
Please give it a rest Pete - on the funny side i did have a chuckle at the irony of you googling that journalist and using this media hosted by Amazon
ragnarr
10/12/2021
15:22
Would Yump kindly address each and every point I have made.
petekand
10/12/2021
15:02
Network chairs write open letter on NHS IT organisation changeshttps://www.digitalhealth.net/2021/12/network-chairs-open-letter-nhs-it-organisation-changes/
ragnarr
10/12/2021
15:01
a few getting impatient today
ragnarr
10/12/2021
14:19
Is this Aussie minister chap related to you by any chance Yump?
petekand
10/12/2021
14:15
I blame Tom Oakley for all this off topic posting.

If he'd provided us with some news we would be discussing relevant topics.

I've been wondering what the two industry specialists in India have been up to. They joined the team six months ago and not heard anything since.

Dr Venkat Ramana Sudigali has a new appointment



Siva Ramamoorthy got an award.



But I've not come across anything Bleepa, Carelocker or Bleepa Box relevant.

ged5
10/12/2021
13:59
Just answer the question.

You can’t can you. It would just expose your selective choice of science to conveniently suit your motives.

How do you choose the bits of medical science that you use and those you don’t.

Does it just depend on what you need at the time ?

yump
10/12/2021
13:37
Would you kindly define ‘your type’ to me?
petekand
10/12/2021
12:56
PeteKand

I knew you wouldn't even attempt to answer the question I posed. I've asked it of quite a few of your type and not one has even tried to answer it.

You've just picked out some more individual things that support your views.

Here's the question again: how do you yourself decide which bits of medical science you are going to take advantage of and which are rubbish ?

Who do you refer to, to make up your mind ?

More importantly, who do you think the general public should refer to ?

By the way, if you are ever in a position where you're likely to have anaesthetic, I suggest you look that up before you agree to it.

yump
Chat Pages: Latest  521  520  519  518  517  516  515  514  513  512  511  510  Older