Empyrean Energy Share Discussion Threads

[the guardian] 13/11/2017 07:12

It would be unethical to issue news which had not already been issued by the operator.

[niceyman1] 13/11/2017 06:44

rns this morning confirming start of testing me thinks!

[bushman1] 13/11/2017 05:39

Well spotted. Does sound very exciting. Gas at every level. Need to find out now whether will flow test naturally or need a little help. Please DYOR and listen to the CEO PCL presentation

[harrissen] 13/11/2017 03:20

Pancontinental Oil & Gas mentions Dempsey at conference

'About to test Dempsey'

[bushman1] 12/11/2017 21:54

It is now weekdays only. Please refer to Clare123 on the Hotcopper bb. SGC.

[bobby1904] 12/11/2017 20:31

Maybe news tonight but Im definitely not getting hung up on that - hopefully though will be during this week. All very exciting!

[kevjames] 12/11/2017 18:44

News may still come tomorrow - remember that any material event carried out on the Friday shift at Dempsey took place after market hours for the ASX market.

[jemjem] 12/11/2017 18:39

I don't think he's claiming it.Its just a fact stated in RNS's.

[bishopawn] 12/11/2017 18:38

A completion rig with appropriate capability is in place to carry out completion and testing of the Dempsey 1-15 well. Due to the reservoir formation pressures encountered while drilling, high pressure rated equipment is being employed for these operations and comprehensive testing of the equipment is being undertaken prior to perforating the first zones for production testing.

IMPORTANTLY: The choice of tubing conveyed perforating equipment reflects Sacgasco’s intent to OPTIMISE the potential gas flows from the identified reservoir intervals selected for testing. The potential reservoirs to be tested are a series of Cretaceous sandstones that have been the hosts for HIGH GAS SHOWS WHILE DRILLING and exhibit positive petrophysical characteristics.

They also exhibit structurally consistent amplitude anomalies similar to those that are observed on seismic elsewhere in the basin where conventional sandstone reservoirs have trapped natural gas in mapped structural closures, e.g. Tulainyo / James and Alvares

Alvares Natural Gas Prospect

The Alvares natural gas prospect is located close to large natural gas pipelines and is on trend 30 miles from the geologically similar multi-Tcf Tulainyo Project.
The Alvares prospect is based on the Alvares-1 gas discovery well drilled in 1982, which intersected a large column of high pressure gas shows in sandstones and conglomerates. The well flowed small quantities of gas to surface with gas quality similar to gas produced from the Northern Sacramento Basin. The Alvares project is estimated to have a total (100%) unrisked recoverable prospective resource on a best estimate deterministic basis of approximately 2.4 Tcf (400 million boe).

[rutter] 12/11/2017 18:33

Are you claiming that there's no work done over the week ends

[royaloak] 12/11/2017 17:43

Remember California around 8 hours after the UK so the Monday shift only starts about 4pm UK time.

[niceyman1] 12/11/2017 14:01

News tonight?

[blueblood] 12/11/2017 12:50

Getting ready to fire the gun gla especially VLTHs!

[mikemichael2] 12/11/2017 12:27

honestmarty
Member since: 15 Oct 2017

That's all you need to know about this tool.

[harrissen] 12/11/2017 11:52

It is very important that you realise SGC is not perforating in order of significance.
It is 'good practice' to start at the bottom and work up. Reason being if you start at the top and work down all the debris and liquids etc, produced will drop to the bottom and could hamper flow testing in the lower region of the hole.. Also, if the tubing gets damaged or twisted it will be a lot easier to repair or replace it above the perforated area. Finally, and for the same reason as above, once they get gas to flow they will stop perforating until the producing perforation is fully flow tested.

[cmackay] 12/11/2017 09:31

Nice share Stewart

[sweetnodude] 12/11/2017 09:13

sweetnodude 11 Nov '17 - 12:12 - 12209 of 12230
High volume of shares traded yesterday in SGC (351m), PCL (999m) and XST (329m) with all 3 ending the day down. Coincidence or something more sinister? I hold EME and SGC by the way so don't bother shooting the messenger! GLA s-n-d

Sorry all, my mistake, just checked again and it seems the volume figures on the site I was using (hotcopper) were complete BS for Friday when compared to the official ASX site. Don't panic Mr Mainwaring! Good luck for the coming week :o)

[stewart4800] 12/11/2017 09:12

HonestmartyThat's easy all of them

[honestmarty] 11/11/2017 23:31

Bushman1
Could you kindly point out which aspects of my posts are " ludicrous, unfounded and erroneous " ?

[bushman1] 11/11/2017 22:27

Dishonest, your only objective is too short as much as you can, everyone can see this, for goodness sake please stop wasting your time and our time as genuine investors having to read your ludicrous, unfounded and erroneous posts. Many thanks.

[eggyweggy] 11/11/2017 21:39

honestmarty - filtered