Emed Mining Share Discussion Threads

[yantatin] 06/1/2015 21:37

Would have taken longer if The Junta hadn't expedited proceedings!

[paulie1] 06/1/2015 21:19

Perhaps if they didn't take 7 years to sort it out....

[rich1e] 06/1/2015 20:42

wanderer it's not worth trying to second guess stuff like that. At the onset of QE, in the US, the dollar and all paper money was going to be trashed. The wise ones would be buyng groceries with silver coins that they'd bought off ebay: we're still waiting.

[yantatin] 06/1/2015 20:34

Stop scaremongering wanderer :-)

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 20:33

Yes, I have to say I hadn't really considered the dip in the copper price would have such an impact on project financing and limit the options available to EMED . . . looks like the global economy played into the hands of Trafigura . . . I wonder who they paid to ensure a downturn in the Chinese economy . . .

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 20:20

No, I offered an opinion on what MIGHT happen NOT definitely after a placing as that is what the BBs are for . . . I then responded to a series of questions and attacks from posters about the issue of de-listing . . . I haven't mentioned it for days now . . . IMHO I responded reasonably and supported my opinion with clear reasoning . . . I'm happy to be proved wrong . . .

[lost horizon] 06/1/2015 20:08

Cufe

You were scaremongering.

LH

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 19:59

Lost Horizon

Again, please point me to any post I made where I definitely said a de-listing would happen . . . I offered an opinion that there might be the possibility of a de-listing at some point in the future that should be considered . . . it might still happen . . . we don't know for certain either way . . .

[plasybryn] 06/1/2015 19:57

Stock ready:
This thread prides itself on letting all people with a view express that without fear of censorship. Long may that continue.

But that means in my book that we have a responsibility to not purposely mislead.

In light of that, and given that you wish to continue posting with credibility, can you please justify your claims made today in post 41656, which are not official and which I strongly suspect are false.

I refer specially to the para commencing: "I never claimed" & finishing, "I.Q. no longer wanted to be part of this".

I assume this is all in your imagination.

I implore readers of this thread to question any statement from any poster which purports to provide inside knowledge. Beware.

[yantatin] 06/1/2015 19:56

deme1

If people can't bring up for discussion various theories and possibilities on a bulletin board, what is the purpose of the bulletin board?

A mutual pat on the back society to congratulate us all on how well we've all done by investing in EMED Mining perhaps??

[lost horizon] 06/1/2015 19:53

deme

"you were peddling the delisting theory all week."

Yes, he was.

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 19:52

deme1

I was responding to posters over a few days after being questioned and attacked for offering an opinion that there might be the possibility of a de-listing at some point in the future that should be considered . . . I don't recall ever saying it would definitely happen . . .

[deme1] 06/1/2015 19:43

cufes2

you were peddling the delisting theory all week.

[paulie1] 06/1/2015 19:40

Perhaps bookworm sold up as he saw it as a morality tale. Who knows who cares. Move the debate on to when do we think volume will increase! Lol

[yantatin] 06/1/2015 19:37

I recall discussions around the possibility of a de-listing, but don't recall anyone saying that it would definitely occur.

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 19:33

parklife77

Please refer me to a post where I said a de-listing was definitely happening . . . I said it was a possibility at some point in the future that should be considered . . . how do you know it won't happen . . .

[cufes2] 06/1/2015 19:18

Everything of significance laughing stock(ready) has said would happen has failed to materialise . . . he has been explicitly claiming inside information here . . . he said finance was finalised as far back as April of last year until very recently . . . he said Trafigura would not be involved in financing EMED . . . he said IQ would not be leaving . . . all totally incorrect . . . he has been ramping EMED across multiple BBs from over 10p . . . another poster who is a danger to other investors and people should be warned about his antics IMHO . . .

[wanderer1210_0] 06/1/2015 17:56

It's a pretty sad state of affairs when all we have to discuss is BW and SR, hit the filter button if they irritate so much, but human nature being what it is the majority won't because they love to be proved correct themselves that X is this and Y is that