Directex Real Share Discussion Threads

[leedsu36] 06/12/2010 18:05

PWhite...i'm deadly serious about the above,where else do you recommend i avoid? or what other threads are you warning people on?

[engelo] 06/12/2010 12:05

leedsu: otoh when we find out could be regarded as a BUY opportunity 8-))

[leedsu36] 06/12/2010 11:48

PWhite...you really do do damage to a stock,what other stocks are you bashing atm,i don't want to make the mistake of buying in them if you post on their threads...tia.

[the_beagle] 06/12/2010 10:16

My goodness. A buyer at long last and they've increased the bid!

[benjib5151] 05/12/2010 23:21

I am hoping that some of the funds TW raised on friday selling all their Medusa shares will be channelled in here....

[battlebus] 05/12/2010 21:57

Cause Cashburne square would scare off the shareholders!

[hyper al] 05/12/2010 21:55

Why call us "Woodburne Square" ?

Yep, it's only a name, but it seems to be very personal!

[marab] 05/12/2010 21:52

HRE is a bit ahead of DXR and TW has answered a few questions for share holders on the thread below. They might give those of us here an inkling of how things could develop.

[moormoney] 05/12/2010 18:02

Easily coped with if he's on permanent filter! He turns up on all kinds of threads but I haven't had to read his rubbish for months. meanwhile I'm looking forward to the early deals announcement after the egm if value increases here on a par with the gold fund--we are backing a winner!

[marab] 05/12/2010 17:54

Since they have farmed out the investment to him maybe he is the EIEIO. (Old macdonald's farm)

Nothing can be done about us blue people spouting off wherever we choose CPS. The only consolation you have is that he is having to pay ADVFN for his comments in hard cash. Looks like some of his shares are not doing to well and he has to take it out on someone. So much like a rerun of the Lander period that it wouldn't be the same without PWhite. Look at him as a buying opportunity as he scares people into selling.

[cps1959] 05/12/2010 17:44

Orado

Your correct, he's the CIO.

[orado] 05/12/2010 16:18

Surely TW isn't the CEO???????

[pwhite73] 05/12/2010 14:38

I know getting any words out of the Landers was like trying to get blood out of a stone but there is something distasteful about a CEO who appears to be on tap like draught beer.

Am I correct in assuming the new company has been named after the street on which the CEO lives?

[cps1959] 05/12/2010 10:47

pwhite

WTF,

'I havn't lost my integraty'
'I'm on your side'

You really have lost the plot.

If anyone is foolish enough to listen to this idiot then they deserve the ramifications.

[ntv] 05/12/2010 09:36

still no tigerdog rns, come on tw paperwork young man

[ntv] 05/12/2010 09:35

if jim mellon and tw funds have 29.8%, surely they are deemed to acting in concert and we should have had an rns to state that

[ntv] 05/12/2010 09:33

have u got a long position there pw? ;-)

[pwhite73] 05/12/2010 09:30

Sorry JJB article posted on wrong thread.

[orado] 05/12/2010 09:02

Jim Mellon owns 30%
Rubbish.

[pwhite73] 04/12/2010 22:50

.....and for those of you who think some major international fund manager has taken a stake in your company take a look at the links below.





T1ps Gold and Growth fund combined worth a miserly £20 million and all of that is made up of penny share microcaps like DXR and worse.

Take a leaf from kenny's book and move on if you're in profit.

[pwhite73] 04/12/2010 22:31

leedsu36 - 4 Dec'10 - 18:02 - 253 of 259

"Hey PWhite your integrity is being challenged."

leedsu36

My integrity has been challenged by many over the years but it still remains intact for I have yet to be proven wrong. You might care to seek further clarification on this.

"You might also remind him that funds we manage, Jim Mellon etc owns 30% of DXR so why on earth would we destroy value as he says..."

I have seen no RNS indicating anybody owns 30% of DXR. If they do this should have triggered an automatic all out bid for the company unless the LSE has granted a waver. If individuals working for or associated with T1ps own stock bringing the accumulation to 30% then together with the funds they are what is known as a "concerted party" and by law should be treated as one shareholder. Which again should trigger a full bid for the company.

Do not believe everything you read. You are a small private shareholder. I am on YOUR side.

must dash-

[keya5000] 04/12/2010 22:13

Globetrotter---

You can trade any amount of times you wish in your SIPP in the same or other stock.