![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corcel Plc | LSE:CRCL | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BKM69866 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.135 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 370,156 | 08:00:07 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels | 0 | -1.26M | -0.0007 | -1.86 | 2.44M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/5/2022 23:03 | Ten days on and Mast now 30% of the price Align took to justify its 20p Corcel target. Still waiting for its new 'target'. | ![]() lurker5 | |
06/5/2022 20:23 | MAST isn't worth anyone bidding for it. Look it up. Look up typical balance sheets for a gas peaking plant SPV. (if you can understand one) Try to think why it doesn't seem to have got funding for Pyebride et al yet. (if you can) Work out what its real return wuld be if it did get external fundng (f you can) Then go away and forget to come back. | ![]() lurker5 | |
06/5/2022 18:30 | No, on their deathbed, many will simply wish they had contributed more to Scottie & Parson's bank accounts. | ![]() mrzippo | |
06/5/2022 16:55 | MAST looking vulnerable to a bid from someone, if CRCL land the news that would send you all into a wibbling frenzy I might be able to have a crack at taking them private myself. Have a good weekend wibbling away to yourselves, each week you get another week older, few will say on their deathbed they wished they wibbled more on a BB thread for a share they never owned or intellectually could never grasp. Wibble wibble. | ![]() mark10101 | |
06/5/2022 10:13 | MAST now down to its predicted proper value. Waiting for Pharamacal's downward Corcel target revision accordingly. I'm sure it will come soon. | ![]() lurker5 | |
05/5/2022 12:46 | Big shovels are coming to scoop up that nickel | ![]() bambos22 | |
05/5/2022 12:05 | Awhoa bamba! Have we located the shovels yet? | ![]() kemche | |
05/5/2022 11:47 | In answer to your question NO it hasn't been there long! | ![]() bambos22 | |
05/5/2022 11:25 | Awhoa bamba! Has it been there long? Pharmacal. | ![]() kemche | |
05/5/2022 11:21 | Mining license in mambare on the desk of the minister | ![]() bambos22 | |
05/5/2022 09:43 | Oink! Oink! Anyone? Scottie and Parsons get £35,000+ remuneration in April. Scottie and Parsons get £35,000+ remuneration in May. Scottie and Parsons get £35,000+ remuneration in June. Can everyone see how the game has changed? No nickel. No cobalt. No vanadium. No Avonmouth. No Tring Road. No Southport and definitely no Burwell. It is one year exactly since Burwell was "right sized". It certainly helped. The Executive Chairman has devoted at least 2 days per week to Corcel. That has certainly helped. Be careful. | ![]() helpfull | |
04/5/2022 18:03 | All the sells were buys. Pharmacal. The game has now changed completely. | ![]() kemche | |
29/4/2022 16:13 | It has been for at least a couple of decades. | ![]() kemche | |
29/4/2022 16:06 | Good news coming!!¡!! | ![]() bambos22 | |
29/4/2022 15:40 | Awhoa Bamba! | ![]() kemche | |
29/4/2022 15:11 | Booom time...up we go | ![]() bambos22 | |
29/4/2022 11:39 | Lurker - fine memory Sir! The corporate undertaking was done by Andersens - what a hoot that was! | ![]() kemche | |
29/4/2022 11:36 | That was a reputable broker re Robert Maxwells outfit - they were the official broker - one of the few examples of honesty. | ![]() lurker5 | |
29/4/2022 10:48 | I do recall certain reputable analysts when asked about companies at the murkier end of the market used to advise "Cannot Recommend A Purchase". But they were not Pharmacal. | ![]() kemche | |
29/4/2022 10:32 | Its hard to know what these paid-for 'research' emanations achieve. No institution would take any notice of their usually economically illiterate forecasts. Most of them are merely a rehash of the cos own PR blurbs and announcments with no critiques or hard questions answered (Just like this one with no dscussion whatsoever of the balance sheets which ar vital to knowing what share dilution is likely). New companies know very little of the true City environment for proper research and what institutions think of it, and their brokers pushing them will, of course, 'recommend' all sorts of exposure just as companies sponsoring such research will be 'pleased' that someone is featuring them - when independent analysts (those within institutions and not in share pushing brokers) wouldn't touch them unless properly covered. That leaves only inexperienced pi's who will take any notice. It sometime works for a while - but inevitably those 'hard' questions the paid for hacks ignore come to bite those naive pi's in their bums. | ![]() lurker5 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions