![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corcel Plc | LSE:CRCL | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BKM69866 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.135 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 370,156 | 08:00:07 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels | 0 | -1.26M | -0.0007 | -1.86 | 2.44M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/4/2022 18:01 | Seriously though. | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
01/4/2022 15:37 | Have been promised 13 mill usd by wife of zambian diamond merchant who sadly died in car crash. Maybe Scottie should speak to her? | ![]() mrzippo | |
01/4/2022 15:26 | What do you consider a large position? | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
01/4/2022 14:44 | I would take a large position here, but feel Scottie & Parsnips dont have enough skin in the game. Surely they need more incentives? Further executive share awards perhaps? Or at least interim cash bonuses. | ![]() mrzippo | |
01/4/2022 14:25 | Are you going to average down before the news drops then? From what you are saying it sounds as if the balance of risk and reward is very much in favour of your doing so. | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
01/4/2022 12:28 | A deadline has been set (June 2021): hxxps://stockboxmedi That was a deadline for FID of the gas peakers for September 2021 (36 mins.). Set by Scottie himself. Six months later and the "Peaker portfolio fundraising progress continues with multiple parties in due diligence and potentially expected to bid during March" update has failed to materialise. No FID. Begs the questions: Do these people know what is going on? and: Should shareholders be preparing themselves for a "no sale" scenario? Be careful. | ![]() helpfull | |
01/4/2022 12:15 | ACT, unfortunately I am a holder from the old RGM days so have been waiting for Mambare for a couple of decades now. But everything is due to be delivered in April so there is something to look forward to unless, by some totally unfortunate and unforeseen circumstances beyond their control, the company should miss their deadlines. But knowing Parsons and Kaintz I think that is not even a remote possibility. | ![]() kemche | |
01/4/2022 12:05 | kemche? Mine is 1.38p. Will I be happy, will I be rich? We'll have to wait and see. | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
31/3/2022 23:17 | What is your average CRCL entry price? | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
30/3/2022 11:46 | ACT, I always check the BOD before I invest and as long as Parsons and Kaintz are on board then so am I. Serial deliverers of value. Always. With nary a thought for their own pocket. | ![]() kemche | |
30/3/2022 10:22 | Oink! Oink! Anyone? Which is the more likely to occur during March? "Peaker portfolio fundraising progress continues with multiple parties in due diligence and potentially expected to bid during March" Or Scottie and Parsons take another £35,000+ in remuneration. Be careful. | ![]() helpfull | |
28/3/2022 19:31 | apf - Do you really think any 'talk' of mine will force the shares down 'so that I can buy' ! I find that idiocy rather pathetic. I don' think I'll be buying (if at all) for a long time yet - until development, feasibility studies, partial funding, any offtakes or farm-ins etc are a long way along the track. As for the energy market who knows how gas costs will affect the industry. All engineering, mining, and energy shares are risky. This one is much more risky than most. | ![]() lurker5 | |
28/3/2022 10:02 | You would not touch it. Fair enough. There is a huge amount of missing information. Absolutely. These sort of plays far more often than not end in tears. Indeed they do. But the current share price is significantly less than one tenth of the straw man analyst target that you are so incensed by. Many of us are just interested in whether, say, 3p, 4p or even 5p is achievable in the short term (maybe only for a short time) with the right news flow. So for us your anti-Align campaign just seems esoteric and irrelevant. You may be doing a great service to anyone who thinks they can take that 19.35p target to the bank and finally afford a Lambo, but I doubt that anyone on here is actually that silly. | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
28/3/2022 10:02 | Lol.You won't touch it....but you'll talk it down to the point where you plan to invest. Pathetic game. | ![]() apfindley | |
28/3/2022 09:20 | Oink! Oink! Anyone? From Coro Energy announcement dated 25 Mar 2020: "James Parsons, non-executive Chairman will transition to the role of Executive Chairman, also with immediate effect" More pennies into the executive pocket of Parsons, I suspect. Another agreement closed out. Does anyone find it strange that there are certain deals that have no problem being closed out? Another £35,000+ remuneration for Scottie and Parsons this month? Be careful. | ![]() helpfull | |
28/3/2022 09:11 | ACT. Professionals in any discipline know when its not possible to make accurate predictions or valuations. In Corcel's place, there just isn't the informatiion to do so and the share price will be very sensitive to even small changes in any plan - not that there is a clear plan yet. It seems you don't know what information is lacking - both in nickel and in generation. In which case you shouldn't be invested in a company like Corcel. My only solid prediction is that Corcel's shares in issue will have to expand very considerably if it is to achieve any of its aims, and not knowing when, market condition when it does, and how much, is one big unknown. That's why I , personally, won't touch it. | ![]() lurker5 | |
28/3/2022 00:16 | But as we have discussed before, if this BB should be about anything, it should be about the valuation of CRCL - of course CRCL is high risk and almost everyone on here understands that the research that comes the way of PIs is not often independent and can shade into being little more than a marketing puff.In other words, I am challenging you to plant your flag in relation to the current valuation of CRCL rather the convenient straw man valuation that Align has given you, a valuation that almost no one on here takes seriously (the market certainly does not). | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
26/3/2022 18:54 | Well, after an amazing early spring week and yet another glorious day I know I would rather wibble my life away on a stock I own than one I don’t and never will own. Takes all sorts in life. Be careful…. | ![]() mark10101 | |
26/3/2022 17:46 | Align provide research notes for hundreds of companies. So why are you interested in outing Align on the Corcel boards terry? | ![]() apfindley | |
26/3/2022 13:57 | I'm pointing out misleading research ACT - as I've already told you. Some board readers might like to know who produced it - wouldn't you think ? I notice you haven't commented on the extraordinary fact that said researcher's 'target price' (obviusly intended to imply to naive investors that the shares will reach it, so inducing them to buy) turned out to be some 80% dependent on what has turned out to be an unreliable 'benchmark'. Having followed that 'significant' benchmark myself (and you, apparently, like said researcher, not bothering to) I can tell you it will probably become even more unreliable in the near future. Ignore my posts if you wish. Don't try to deter others. The fact is that the peaker business is not necessarily the cash cow it is imagined to be and cerainly won't pay Corcel's overheads let alone contribute to developing its nickel assets. They are the key to Corcel's valuation and potential future share dilution and price. Proper research would concentrate (and put a properly worked out value) on that, and not on a peaker business the researcer obviously doesn't understand. | ![]() lurker5 | |
26/3/2022 10:09 | Is it really fair to run your anti-Align campaign on here? If you were a CRCL-specific bear you could post on here about CRCL all day long as far as I am concerned, but all this anti-Align stuff is just drowning out any useful discussion of the pros and cons of CRCL. | ![]() arlington chetwynd talbott | |
24/3/2022 14:16 | Careful Kemche ! (or perhaps you know) RRR was mixed up 10 years ago with a certain company which our Align Corcel tipster puffed furiously (and went onto its board !)- with his usual 'there is no doubt that' trademark, meaning his assertions have no backing or evidence. That particuar company went bust fairly soon (amd was the subject of a famous denunciation by a respected Financial Times mining journalist) because, surprise, surprise, it turned out that our friend's 'assertions' were just that. No evidence. No 'research', no judgement, no evidence of analytical ability - he not having noticed misleading and contradictory statements in said company's resource statement and believing the company's puff. | ![]() lurker5 | |
24/3/2022 11:57 | Convicted buy. Pharmacal! | ![]() kemche |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions