![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.25 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 3.79M | -2.55M | -0.4844 | -0.05 | 118.45k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/5/2016 15:30 | nice bump up on a 50k with 100k buy paying a reasonable premium :) | ![]() sportbilly1976 | |
13/5/2016 13:16 | we are dealing with the mafia :-) | ![]() neo26 | |
13/5/2016 11:56 | After losing the election Prabowo was threatening to cause havoc for President Widodo's term of office. What if anything did President Widodo offer to Prabowo to bring this dramatic change involving rather forced embraces and smiles? | ![]() masarap | |
13/5/2016 11:14 | Now now Debbie, Mr Noor might sue you for saying that. lol | ![]() neo26 | |
13/5/2016 10:55 | Pug, that's certainly a possibility despite the evidence we are aware of suggesting that the claimed anomalies (autopen / reference numbers) existed on other licenses that were sanctioned. Also, initialing of the CHL survey licenses by key officials suggests, contrary to their evidence, that they were aware and indeed sanctioned the licenses. I think DQ has made the point that much of the ROI case in this authenticity phase rests on Isran Noor saying, amongst other things, he was tricked into signing the Exploitation Licenses. Aside from the fact that all the licenses were recorded in the Regent's log book, his claim no longer has any validity or relevance because his evidence has been struck out. | ![]() masarap | |
13/5/2016 10:49 | Masarap This is a muddy affair, i feel for the Roi lawyers as they have had to change stories numerous times, i bet they are somewhat embarrassed. Well not long till June now, maybe all will be revealed. | ![]() neo26 | |
13/5/2016 10:44 | Churchill's lawyers asked for this latest ROI about turn to be discounted because it wasn't raised at the hearing and consequently CHL were deprived of the opportunity to answer and call appropriate witnesses. | ![]() masarap | |
13/5/2016 10:36 | neo26, not so as ROI changed their story again: "In June 2015, by way of an RNS announcement the Company noted the fact that Indonesia no longer alleged that Churchill participated in the alleged scheme to defraud Indonesia. In its first Post Hearing Brief however, and in spite of the fact that on two prior occasions Indonesia represented that it was not and had never accused Churchill or its officers of forgery or fraud, Indonesia once again changed its case such that it once again made allegations of forgery and fraud against Churchill (rather than Ridlatama alone). These new allegations by Indonesia were not part of the case Indonesia presented at the August Document Authenticity hearing and focused on a former Company executive who was not present at the August hearing and who Indonesia did not request for cross examination." | ![]() masarap | |
13/5/2016 10:30 | Icsid may allow the possibility of the earlier licences being dodgy but decide that the later uncontested licenses make that irrelevant. Isran Noor has stated he was 'tricked' by the earlier licences but as we know failed to show for cross examination. Icsid judgements are often many layered. | ![]() pug151 | |
13/5/2016 10:23 | If you look at the Icsid notes they have asked both parties to respond by providing legal opinions on the situation if forgery proved. So DQ will have seen our full legal argument . | ![]() pug151 | |
13/5/2016 10:22 | rossannan Roi have conceded that CHL were not part of any fraud, they are pointing the finger at the former partners Ridlatama.. | ![]() neo26 | |
13/5/2016 10:15 | pug151 So why are Roi behaving like spoilt brats then? Why delay by defaulting on their payments due? Why at every possibility are they undermining the tribunal.. | ![]() neo26 | |
13/5/2016 10:06 | I think DB is correct. There is also the possibility that ICSID will be unable to give a definite answer to the forgery question. | ![]() pug151 | |
13/5/2016 09:52 | Rossamon sorry thats wrong ! If we lose but we bought our licenses in good faith/always paid our dues to correct autorities etc and another party had forged them ie Ridlatama that when the law of estoppel comes into play. We have done research/group discussion and googled it. I seem to remember that consensus was we would get between 30 and 50% of what we would otherwise expect to get if the licences are and always have been genuine. Thats why DQ said even if we were to lose its not over. | ![]() debbiegee | |
13/5/2016 09:33 | Or is this just a bluff by Quinlivan, i.e we know the valuation understates the true position and we would love the opportunity to revalue it, or we secretly know it's overvalued but are ROI willing to take the risk and have it revalued? Either way, if it gets to this stage I think it means that ROI has conceded they are at fault. Just means a lot more time wasting. | theorb | |
13/5/2016 00:55 | Yes Masarap as DQ described it we await a gateway event. | ![]() pug151 | |
12/5/2016 22:11 | Quinlivan made interesting comment in the lastest podcast, he state no matter the result of the tribunal on authenticity, the case will not end their. In a previous presentation he stated we are quietly confident of winning the authenticity case. Its going to be interesting if we win the authenticity case then it goes to the merit, Roi may claim the resources to be not economically viable, then chl can reevaluate their $1.3b compensation package which they believe should be close to $2b. | ![]() neo26 | |
12/5/2016 19:47 | Debbie cannot ban 'blue' posters so most just filter the attention seeking irritants. Churchill don't need cash for some time as their Chairman, David Quinlivan, stated this week they currently have circa $2m and will not raise prior to the authenticity decision. I assume that $2m doesn't include the $200,000 that will be refunded by ICSID after ROI belatedly paid their fees without explanation for their default. If CHL win the authenticity of documents decision then the share price will be substantially higher. ROI will have played most if not all their cards and may choose to settle in order to help attract internaitonal investment or they may choose to go the full distance. David Quinlivan estimated this 'full distance' would take 12 to 18 months and he has said they will need between $3m and $5m for that. I can't see them having to issue more than 10m shares (demand will be high if CHL win on authenticity) and using a litigation funder would be completely unnecessary. | ![]() masarap | |
12/5/2016 19:43 | As BR's bum bandit chums say IN BR WE THRUST. | ![]() thailand | |
12/5/2016 19:35 | My apologies in advance if this post is misconstrued That BR is a w@nker, I rarely post these days, but he never gives up till he gets his prize just like in Yell and GKP, clearly a licentious person. He loves goading any rebels, don't give him the ammunition. I don't think he's wicked but most probably a shark. Why Debbie is not banning him? His goal is to disrupt, then pick on the scared & weak ones, that's the ultimate goal. Is it true CHL needs cash? I thought they got £300K something 2-3 months ago? or is he seeding fears into punters mind? | the infidel |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions