Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

[reesyheli] 11/5/2016 13:10

hungry burgerman 11 May'16 - 12:12 - 4152 of 4163 1 1

.. in my very modest opinion it's not the length of someone's member that should be the barometer of their comments praiseworthiness.


There y'go corrected the typo

[neo26] 11/5/2016 13:01

my targets £2.50

[patviera] 11/5/2016 12:51

Who caresDebbie just Ramps all day longShe had a 400p tgtShame on debbie

[bad robot] 11/5/2016 12:50

Warning

DRIP DRIP DRIP
BANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG
0p




Hope this helps

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 12:37

You obviously have not trawled very well but thats up to you.
And what you do with your money and trades is also up to you.

[stephen1946] 11/5/2016 12:36

Hungry a poster gives an opinion and thats the end of it, a continual rant on the reasons for that opinion is counter productive. Ok you see chl as a loser, any genuine poster having researched and found such would move on, but a shorter sticks around posting utter drivel that becomes uninteresting and frankly, quite boring. Example such as bad robot and 11 per cent to name two, off the wall lunatics.
Surely hungry your talents would be better served spouting your spleen somewhere else.
Me? I am a buyer, stock piling.

[neo26] 11/5/2016 12:28

thats true but their is no certainty with any stocks.

its upto you if you want to invest no one can twist your arm.

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 12:27

hungry I think you will find most people here have a reputation to consider and post responsibly IF we win.
We also have our own ideas of the odds here.
We are not masquerading under different names daily thinking we can say whatever we like .
We also have the sense to know nobody would listen

[neo26] 11/5/2016 12:21

hungry man

it doesnt matter 1p drop or penny gain, what matters is if we win the case.

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 12:18

MY view is the last of the traders are forced to exit
Investors creeping in
Longs mostly staying put
Shorters were working overtime yesterday to protect their stoplosses being hit after shorting app 20ish.

[coley15] 11/5/2016 12:04

hilarious - member for only 5 days, yet straight into the de-ramping mindset. It's taken me years to become bitter ;o)

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 11:48

Hungry burgerman probably ticked his own post up with his other aliases lol
This is only the 2nd post under this name

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 11:45

Neo ,I think they already are lol !

[neo26] 11/5/2016 11:44

put it this way, its not long now the decision of the forgery case, IF thats in CHL favour ROI will be running like headless chickens.

[daddy warbucks] 11/5/2016 09:41

It is only when the ROI stepped outside the rules of the BIT treaty, that our government could do something. I believe that is also when DQ put pressure on the Australian government with his letter to them.Whether any pressure/ persuasion was exerted on the ROI, we may never know.

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 09:36

Uhhhhmmmmm they HAD defaulted on at least 3 deadlines
We had to go for Rule 42 and ask ICSID to inform them and give them another 2 wks {or whatever Icsid thought} grace to pay and explain.
They have now paid but not explained !

[theorb] 11/5/2016 09:28

neo, Chl stated that ROI had defaulted but as ROI actually paid within the generous time allowed by the arbitration, my understanding is that you could not say they defaulted? |Ultimately ROI paid their fee in time and are still part of the arbitration so Government's have no right to have a word with a anyone.

[debbiegee] 11/5/2016 08:21

From the podcast yesterday what DQ actually said

" Decision in the near future,next month or so "