![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.25 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 3.79M | -2.55M | -0.4844 | -0.05 | 118.45k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/5/2016 12:08 | Going through previous awards is worthwhile as a guide but to take them as a certainty that the same thing will ultimatly happen here is equally naive. Circumstances vary enormously, and the intimidation, violence and spurious allegations of forgery, i feel, will go a long towards ensuring CHL get a justifiably large amount of their claim. Taking on board the fact that not only do ROI think they can treat Chl badly they also treat icsid with utter contempt, that sort of bravado is expensive. | ![]() stephen1946 | |
10/5/2016 11:43 | Agree - but it's nice to dream ..... | ![]() coley15 | |
10/5/2016 11:42 | rossanan, whatever the award amount (if any) then there is currently an additional circa 24% to add and if it takes 18 months more than add on an extra 42% ... actually more if it is compound interest. Without question it's a point worthy of noting / discussion. | ![]() masarap | |
10/5/2016 11:08 | FlyingC, PBO1 thanks for that ... now we know at least one reason why ROI appear to have sought a settlement albeit probably a very low one. If ROI think they are going to lose you'd think they are not going to want to drag it out by time delays. | ![]() masarap | |
10/5/2016 11:05 | Just found this on another site,have not looked yet but think its the same | ![]() debbiegee | |
10/5/2016 11:04 | I was wrong. Interest rate is closer to 12% per annum. Edit: - That would make the claim now closer to USD 1.64 Bn (796 p/share based on 147M shares) or 8p per share per month interest. based on exchange rate of USD1.4 = 1 pound Staggering interest levels. Please someone check my maths | ![]() pb01 | |
10/5/2016 11:04 | Thanks PB01 (4086) If it is 8% then that's well over $100M alone in interest per year, and it's been two years since that valuation already. Ouch ! (if you are ROI......). FC | ![]() flyingc | |
10/5/2016 11:01 | Many thanks for the header update ! Great job as always :-)))))))) Surprising how many folk are lurking in the background ! Including our unsung hero :-)))))))) | ![]() debbiegee | |
10/5/2016 10:22 | I think when we last looked at the interest issue it was calculated at the Indonesian rate which was something like 8% from memory. This equates to an interest level of several pence per share per month - the interest was huge! If you also recall in DQ's youtube video (see link in the header) the valuation of the current claim plus interest (at the time in December) was equivalent to 720 pence per share. | ![]() pb01 | |
10/5/2016 10:20 | If and only when my little elf has time could he please add this latest interview with Mr Quinliven to the header :-))))) | ![]() debbiegee | |
10/5/2016 10:14 | Thanks Masarap (4083) I haven't researched this point too thoroughly (and so am open to correction), but I understand the ICSID case against Venezuela last year involved interest being calculated at 3.25%, compounded annually. I haven't got my calculator out, but two more years equates to a lot of cash over and above the $1.315bn. The interest alone for that period is probably worth more than CHL's present market cap..... FC | ![]() flyingc | |
10/5/2016 09:40 | Thanks rettah, so almost exactly 2 years interest to add on as the precise amount claimed through ICSID was filed in June 2014. "In June 2014 Churchill/PlanetR | ![]() masarap | |
10/5/2016 09:24 | "Amount claimed is 1.31b plus interest" Just to clarify, the claim includes pre claim interest. The post claim interest is what is accruing. | ![]() rettah | |
10/5/2016 09:19 | CHILCOT finishes his enquiry in June, just in time for him to take over the arbitration and move things along? | theorb | |
10/5/2016 09:13 | $2m cash in bank at present - 'more than enough' to complete this authenticity phase. Not sure if that includes the $200,000 that ROI have sent to ICSID who, in turn, will refund CHL. | ![]() masarap | |
10/5/2016 09:04 | As to the icsid hearing ,it seems strange that a sovereign state ROI can take one side,but the other side (a comparatively small entity) cannot get help or advice from its state entity. | ![]() p@ | |
10/5/2016 08:57 | Ross I did say that was the surprise element and will def listen again later Quiet under the radar at the moment as many of our regular visitors are in hibernation LOL | ![]() debbiegee | |
10/5/2016 08:57 | Aimstocks- Very informative interview and Churchill starts at 22 mins...Thnx | ![]() p@ | |
10/5/2016 08:55 | I dont think there can be many more forced sellers | ![]() debbiegee | |
10/5/2016 08:50 | A game of poker is my view, first ROI dont pay, then when chl pay for them, roi pay up, now D.Q.says result in june then indicates funding is not an issue when he confidently predicts completion of merits and quantum in 12 to 18 months. Roi bluff is called everytime by D.Q. settlement is an absolute certainty, for argument sake, less before forgery result, much more after should chl win. | ![]() stephen1946 | |
10/5/2016 08:44 | If the forgery decision goes our way CHL will be able to do a small equity placing at a much higher price of circa 50p+ to fund the remainder of the process. Any dilutive affects to existing shareholders will be minimal. So I doubt they will need litigation funders. Personally I still believe there's a strong likelihood we will get an out of court settlement before the results of the forgery hearing. The RoI will not want their reputation and future foreign investments harmed by a damning report from the ICSID. | ![]() pb01 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions