Ceres Power Share Discussion Threads

[asparks] 07/11/2012 10:51

pleased I didnt get sucked in here yesterday. Its game over, get out while you can

[stegrego] 07/11/2012 10:04

It fell, from the pumped up price of 12p, because of the company basically saying it was game over.
Oppenheimer sold then to salvage what little they could.

[maxmarilli] 07/11/2012 08:47

someone happy to get them at 2.5p

[maxmarilli] 07/11/2012 08:33

cl2201,any comments?

[maxmarilli] 07/11/2012 08:23

Traders come and going and creates momentum,that is a fact in any share.Since it was pushed down so much,can i restore a bit of fairness to the sp?For the last time,i invested in CWR because i beleive it will be saved and will carry on....anyway,why you don`t want CWR to go up and,especially be saved?I think all shareholders hope for that....

[34simon] 07/11/2012 08:22

tara7 7 Nov'12 - 08:21 - 4978 of 4978 (Filtered)

Total nonsense and filtered.

[tara7] 07/11/2012 08:21

The very reason I have the edge on the stock market is that 99.8% of you base your buys on those accounts.

I do not.

To prove my point go to the PTO thread, investors have been scared off by those accounts, that has let me buy stock that is dirt cheap and will no doubt go on to ten bag.

The FD of the company[who knows more than anyone] has just put a years wages into the companies shares at the high for the year.!!!!

I do not own CRES and it has huge risk but accounts look back, I look up and out.

Good luck.

[maxmarilli] 07/11/2012 08:15

no simon,,can you see that L2 is signalling a move up?I think everyone wants his own shares to move up,unless shorting.No harm in that.another thing is to say for selling it....but i`m holding it `till i see 8/10p....of course i`m positive..if traders come in,no harm.....in fact this share was 12p just a month ago.....and it was taken down so much because?THE OPPENHEIMER FUND SELLING!

[34simon] 07/11/2012 08:14

I think the company will be insolvent in less than 6 months Tara.

That is because I can read the accounts, you should try it.

[tara7] 07/11/2012 08:13

Have an idea 34Simon was the buyer of the 1.4M

It is clear he likes the company.!!!!

[34simon] 07/11/2012 08:10

I see you have not hesitated to try and ramp this again on the topinfo thread max !

[maxmarilli] 07/11/2012 08:00

so ,who bought the 1.4 mill yesterday?£44k on a dead horse seems a bit strange,maybe is full of run,instead...

[maxmarilli] 06/11/2012 18:48

It was incorrect....that is why they changed it....i hope it was an honest mistake....otherwise someone might have it done because?buying more shares cheaply?

[tara7] 06/11/2012 18:28

Sorry, but i read the 2nd RNS as saying the heading of the first was miss leading.!!!

[maxmarilli] 06/11/2012 17:33

that 1.4 mill was a buy just after the rns.....who wants to buy at 3.1p when the company just put out an rns saying winding down in the main title?maybe the same person that will bid for it?

[maxmarilli] 06/11/2012 17:21

34simon,i read the account and they did burn 16 mill last year.Then they announced cost saving measures,so they are burning approx £1 mill per month.I think £4 to £5 mill left in the bank that will be reflected in share price IF the co will be backed up by someone,then 6 to 8p would be fair value.IF company wind down,then this money left will be used to pay employees and various expenses,leaving almost nothing or nothing to shareholders.The clou is :will the company will be bought out or will get backed up by someone?If yes,this is incredibly cheap,if not lose it all....that is the way i see it...and the reason i bought in....is that fair enough?

[maxmarilli] 06/11/2012 17:15

Sueyou1,then what are you doing here?if you don`t buy and don`t sell the shares,what is your purpose?I`m a shareholder in CWR,and in profit,actually...

[maxmarilli] 06/11/2012 17:07

2nd rns came at 16.32 changing the title only?you wonder who write these importants rns....

[sueyou1] 06/11/2012 17:06

WORTHLESS. GET IT!!

[34simon] 06/11/2012 17:02

One thing I have learned over my time here is it is totally fruitless to try and argue a case with a pump and dumper, they are so thick skinned they will never admit to what they do like none of them have actually returned to this thread this afternoon to admit they dumped, also it would seem a pump and dumper even if they do not know each away from this site has some kind of moral duty to defend each other, I mean how brazen is it to what has happened here and here we are having to read the posts of a person saying how wonderful the likes of Topinfo are, not the words I would choose :-))

The saying "one day rodders" applies to becoming a millionaire and also could apply to the same chances advfn or the FSA did something about these pump and dumpers, both will never happen.

[sueyou1] 06/11/2012 17:01

CERES first RNS was entitled 'Wind down of Business'

Their replacement RNS was entitled 'Company Update (Replacement)'

I take it that the first one was accurate and the discussions are going nowhere so they are looking at winding down soon, the second was put out when they realised their mistake!!






Anyone putting money into CWR must like throwing money away LOL!! CWR is a company that has declared more than once by by RNS that it is looking at winding down the company, therefore AVOID at all costs.